IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/r/sef/csefwp/249.html
   My bibliography  Save this item

Exclusive Territories and Manufacturers’ Collusion

Citations

Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
as


Cited by:

  1. Nils Wuytens & Jelle Schepers & Pieter Vandekerkhof & Wim Voordeckers, 2025. "The allegory of tacit knowledge: a review & research agenda for entrepreneurship," Review of Managerial Science, Springer, vol. 19(5), pages 1347-1380, May.
  2. Bian, Junsong & Guo, Xiaolei & Li, Kevin W., 2015. "Distribution channel strategies in a mixed market," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 162(C), pages 13-24.
  3. Xiao, Junji & Ju, Heng, 2016. "The determinants of dealership structure: Empirical analysis of the Chinese auto market," Journal of Comparative Economics, Elsevier, vol. 44(4), pages 961-981.
  4. Markus Reisinger & Tim Paul Thomes, 2017. "Manufacturer collusion: Strategic implications of the channel structure," Journal of Economics & Management Strategy, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 26(4), pages 923-954, December.
  5. Charistos, Konstantinos & Pinopoulos, Ioannis N. & Skartados, Panagiotis, 2022. "Passive forward ownership and upstream collusion," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 216(C).
  6. Kenji Matsui & Yushi Tsunoda, 2022. "Effectiveness of exclusive territories by competing manufacturers managing dual‐channel supply chains," Managerial and Decision Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 43(4), pages 1015-1024, June.
  7. Teis Lunde Lømo & Simen A. Ulsaker, 2021. "Lump‐Sum Payments and Retail Services: A Relational Contracting Perspective," Journal of Industrial Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 69(1), pages 131-168, March.
  8. Isabel Teichmann & Vanessa von Schlippenbach, 2014. "Collusive Effects of a Monopolist's Use of an Intermediary to Deliver to Retailers," Discussion Papers of DIW Berlin 1440, DIW Berlin, German Institute for Economic Research.
  9. Enrique Andreu & Damien Neven & Salvatore Piccolo & Roberto Venturini, 2023. "Upstream conduct and price authority with competing organizations," Journal of Economics & Management Strategy, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 32(4), pages 788-810, October.
  10. Bian, Junsong & Zhao, Xuan & Liu, Yunchuan, 2020. "Single vs. cross distribution channels with manufacturers’ dynamic tacit collusion," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 220(C).
  11. Lømo, Teis Lunde & Ulsaker, Simen Aardal, 2016. "Promotional allowances," Working Papers in Economics 08/16, University of Bergen, Department of Economics.
  12. O. Cem Ozturk & Necati Tereyagoglu, 2022. "Distribution Channel Relationships in the Presence of Multimarket Contact," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 31(1), pages 218-238, January.
  13. Wang, Jingqi & Shin, Hyoduk & Zhou, Qin, 2021. "The optimal investment decision for an innovative supplier in a supply chain," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 292(3), pages 967-979.
  14. Subrata Saha & Zbigniew Banaszak & Grzegorz Bocewicz & Izabela Ewa Nielsen, 2022. "Pricing and quality competition for substitutable green products with a common retailer," Operational Research, Springer, vol. 22(4), pages 3713-3746, September.
  15. Jianjun LU & Wen Tian, 2012. "Analysis of the Dynamical Behavior of Firms in a Three Layered Modular Assembly Model," Information Management and Business Review, AMH International, vol. 4(3), pages 128-135.
  16. Bian, Junsong & Lai, Kin Keung & Hua, Zhongsheng & Zhao, Xuan & Zhou, Guanghui, 2018. "Bertrand vs. Cournot competition in distribution channels with upstream collusion," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 204(C), pages 278-289.
  17. Bian, Junsong & Guo, Xiaolei & Li, Kevin W., 2018. "Decentralization or integration: Distribution channel selection under environmental taxation," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 113(C), pages 170-193.
  18. Lee, Jen-Yao & Wang, Leonard F. S. & Sun, Ji, 2022. "Relative-performance delegation destabilizes upstream collusion," MPRA Paper 114939, University Library of Munich, Germany, revised 12 Oct 2022.
  19. Jianhua Ma & Xingzheng Ai & Wen Yang & Yanchun Pan, 2019. "Decentralization versus coordination in competing supply chains under retailers’ extended warranties," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 275(2), pages 485-510, April.
  20. Wenyi Du & Yubing Fan & Lina Yan, 2018. "Pricing Strategies for Competitive Water Supply Chains under Different Power Structures: An Application to the South-to-North Water Diversion Project in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(8), pages 1-13, August.
  21. Long Cheng & Guangliang Ye, 2025. "Does Aftermarket Monopolization Facilitate Upstream Collusion?," Review of Industrial Organization, Springer;The Industrial Organization Society, vol. 66(3), pages 325-347, March.
  22. Wei-Min Hu & Junji Xiao & Xiaolan Zhou, 2014. "Collusion or Competition? Interfirm Relationships in the Chinese Auto Industry," Journal of Industrial Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 62(1), pages 1-40, March.
  23. Leonard F. S. Wang & Han Wang, 2021. "Will managerial delegation impede upstream collusion?," Journal of Economics, Springer, vol. 134(2), pages 127-146, October.
  24. Bin Ying & Leonard F. S. Wang & Qidi Zhang, 2023. "Upstream collusion and corporate social responsibility in downstream competition," Managerial and Decision Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 44(2), pages 1020-1028, March.
  25. Xiaona Zheng & Luping Sun & Andy A. Tsay, 2018. "Distribution Channel Strategies and Retailer Collusion in a Supply Chain with Multiple Retailers," Asia-Pacific Journal of Operational Research (APJOR), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 35(03), pages 1-27, June.
  26. Bian, Junsong & Lai, Kin Keung & Hua, Zhongsheng, 2013. "Upstream collusion and downstream managerial incentives," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 118(1), pages 97-100.
  27. Vasconcelos, Luís, 2017. "A signaling-based theory of contractual commitment to relationships," European Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 93(C), pages 123-138.
IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.