IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/r/rco/dpaper/334.html

Aversion to Hiring Algorithms: Transparency, Gender Profiling, and Self-Confidence

Citations

Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
as


Cited by:

  1. Mathieu Chevrier & Sébastien Massoni, 2026. "When Does Advisor Confidence Improve Decisions? Evidence from Human and Algorithmic Advice," GREDEG Working Papers 2026-09, Groupe de REcherche en Droit, Economie, Gestion (GREDEG CNRS), Université Côte d'Azur, France.
  2. Koch, Alexander & Kragl, Jenny & Ming, Sijuan & Nafziger, Julia, 2026. "The Effects of AI Assistance on Self-Promotion," IZA Discussion Papers 18441, IZA Network @ LISER.
  3. Mallory Avery & Edwin Ip & Andreas Leibbrandt & Joseph Vecci, 2026. "A Brave New World of Hiring: A Natural Field Experiment on How Asynchronous Interviews and AI Assessment Reshape Recruitment," CESifo Working Paper Series 12573, CESifo.
  4. Bernd Irlenbusch & Holger A. Rau & Rainer Michael Rilke, 2026. "Human–AI Evaluation and Gender Transparency: Application Decisions in Competitive Hiring," ECONtribute Discussion Papers Series 398, University of Bonn and University of Cologne, Germany.
  5. Guillaume Revillod, 2024. "Why Do Swiss HR Departments Dislike Algorithms in Their Recruitment Process? An Empirical Analysis," Administrative Sciences, MDPI, vol. 14(10), pages 1-34, October.
  6. Sanchaita Hazra & Marta Serra-Garcia, 2025. "Understanding Trust in AI as an Information Source: Cross-Country Evidence," CESifo Working Paper Series 11954, CESifo.
  7. Bernd Irlenbusch, 2026. "Human Trust in AI: Evidence from Experimental Economics," ECONtribute Discussion Papers Series 417, University of Bonn and University of Cologne, Germany.
  8. Abel, Martin & Dawi, Raghad & Lenk, Tyler & Singer, Aidan, 2026. "Algorithm Aversion in Prosocial Tasks: Evidence from AI-Based Performance Evaluation," IZA Discussion Papers 18678, IZA Network @ LISER.
  9. Bó, Inácio & Chen, Li & Hakimov, Rustamdjan, 2024. "Strategic responses to personalized pricing and demand for privacy: An experiment," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 148(C), pages 487-516.
  10. Ivanova-Stenzel, Radosveta & Tolksdorf, Michel, 2023. "Measuring Preferences for Algorithms - Are people really algorithm averse after seeing the algorithm perform?," VfS Annual Conference 2023 (Regensburg): Growth and the "sociale Frage" 277692, Verein für Socialpolitik / German Economic Association.
  11. Mallory Avery & Andreas Leibbrandt & Joseph Vecci, 2023. "Does Artificial Intelligence Help or Hurt Gender Diversity? Evidence from Two Field Experiments on Recruitment in Tech," Monash Economics Working Papers 2023-09, Monash University, Department of Economics.
  12. Xinyu Cao & Chenshan Hu & Jiankun Sun & Dennis J. Zhang, 2026. "How Forced Intervention Facilitates AI Adoption," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 28(4), pages 1286-1306, July.
  13. Samuel E. Skowronek & Joyce C. He, 2026. "Gendered Navigation of Advice and Suboptimal Behavior in Matching Algorithms: Evidence from the Residency Match," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 37(3), pages 1165-1192, May.
  14. Felipe Caro & Jean-Edouard Colliard & Elena Katok & Axel Ockenfels & Nicolas Stier-Moses & Catherine Tucker & D. J. Wu, 2026. "Introduction to the Special Issue on the Human-Algorithm Connection," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 72(1), pages 1-13, January.
  15. Radosveta Ivanova-Stenzel & Michel Tolksdorf, 2025. "Delegating in the Age of AI: Preferences for Decision Autonomy," Rationality and Competition Discussion Paper Series 558, CRC TRR 190 Rationality and Competition.
  16. Marie-Pierre Dargnies & Rustamdjan Hakimov & Dorothea Kübler, 2025. "Behavioral Measures Improve AI Hiring: A Field Experiment," Rationality and Competition Discussion Paper Series 532, CRC TRR 190 Rationality and Competition.
  17. Jeanne Hagenbach & Aurélien Salas, 2024. "Strategic Information Disclosure to Classification Algorithms: An Experiment," Sciences Po Economics Publications (main) hal-04823243, HAL.
  18. Enrico Diecidue & Ahmed Guecioueur & Qiong Xia, 2026. "Trusting human versus machine predictions as a decision under ambiguity," Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, Springer, vol. 72(3), pages 455-483, June.
  19. Alekseev, Aleksandr & Strobel, Christina, 2026. "A taxonomy of AI experiments," Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics (formerly The Journal of Socio-Economics), Elsevier, vol. 121(C).
  20. Chowdhury Mohammad Sakib Anwar & Konstantinos Georgalos, 2026. "Playing Against the Machine: Cooperation, Communication, and Strategy Heterogeneity in Repeated Prisoner's Dilemma," Papers 2603.15852, arXiv.org.
  21. Ivanova-Stenzel, Radosveta & Tolksdorf, Michel, 2024. "Measuring preferences for algorithms — How willing are people to cede control to algorithms?," Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics (formerly The Journal of Socio-Economics), Elsevier, vol. 112(C).
  22. Marina Chugunova & Wolfgang J. Luhan, 2025. "Ruled by robots: preference for algorithmic decision makers and perceptions of their choices," Public Choice, Springer, vol. 202(1), pages 1-24, January.
  23. Irlenbusch, Bernd & Rau, Holger & Rilke, Rainer, 2026. "Human-AI Evaluation and Gender Transparency: Application Decisions in Competitive Hiring," IZA Discussion Papers 18517, IZA Network @ LISER.
  24. Mathieu Chevrier & Brice Corgnet & Eric Guerci & Julie Rosaz, 2024. "Algorithm Credulity: Human and Algorithmic Advice in Prediction Experiments," GREDEG Working Papers 2024-03, Groupe de REcherche en Droit, Economie, Gestion (GREDEG CNRS), Université Côte d'Azur, France, revised Dec 2024.
  25. Bohren, Noah & Hakimov, Rustamdjan & Lalive, Rafael, 2024. "Creative and Strategic Capabilities of Generative AI: Evidence from Large-Scale Experiments," CEPR Discussion Papers 19507, Centre for Economic Policy Research.
  26. Strobel, Christina, 2025. "The impact of process automation on performance," Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics (formerly The Journal of Socio-Economics), Elsevier, vol. 117(C).
IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.