IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/r/oxp/obooks/9780199557738.html

Manufacturing Possibilities: Creative Action and Industrial Recomposition in the United States, Germany, and Japan

Citations

Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
as


Cited by:

  1. Cody, John, 2015. "How labor manages productivity advances and crisis response: A comparative study of automotive manufacturing in Germany and the US," GLU Working Papers 32, Global Labour University (GLU).
  2. Maja Tampe, 2018. "Leveraging the Vertical: The Contested Dynamics of Sustainability Standards and Labour in Global Production Networks," British Journal of Industrial Relations, London School of Economics, vol. 56(1), pages 43-74, March.
  3. Rawi Abdelal, 2013. "The profits of power: Commerce and realpolitik in Eurasia," Review of International Political Economy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 20(3), pages 421-456, June.
  4. Garcia-Calvo, Angela, 2016. "Institutional development and bank competitive transformation in late industrializing economies: the Spanish case," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 90296, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
  5. Calvo Angela Garcia, 2016. "Institutional development and bank competitive transformation in late industrializing economies: the Spanish case," Business and Politics, De Gruyter, vol. 18(1), pages 27-62, April.
  6. Linda Westman & Christopher Luederitz & Aravind Kundurpi & Alexander Julian Mercado & Sarah Lynn Burch, 2023. "Market transformations as collaborative change: Institutional co‐evolution through small business entrepreneurship," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 32(2), pages 936-957, February.
  7. Anke Hassel, 2011. "The paradox of liberalization – Understanding dualism and the recovery of the German political economy," LEQS – LSE 'Europe in Question' Discussion Paper Series 42, European Institute, LSE.
  8. Charles Sabel & Gary Herrigel & Peer Hull Kristensen, 2018. "Regulation under uncertainty: The coevolution of industry and regulation," Regulation & Governance, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 12(3), pages 371-394, September.
  9. Martina Fromhold-Eisebith, 2012. "From Exit to Excellence: Turning Old Industry Regions into Knowledge Regions through Triple Helix Processes," Chapters, in: Marina van Geenhuizen & Peter Nijkamp (ed.), Creative Knowledge Cities, chapter 8, Edward Elgar Publishing.
  10. Hassel, Anke, 2011. "The paradox of liberalization – understanding dualism and the recovery of the German political economy," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 53212, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
  11. Peer Hull. Kristensen & Glenn Morgan, 2012. "From Institutional Change to Experimentalist Institutions," Industrial Relations: A Journal of Economy and Society, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 51, pages 413-437, April.
  12. Marco Bettiol & Vladi Finotto & Eleonora Di Maria & Stefano Micelli, 2014. "The hidden side of innovation: why tinkerers matter," Working Papers 08, Venice School of Management - Department of Management, Università Ca' Foscari Venezia.
  13. Mitsch, Frieder & Hassel, Anke & Soskice, David, 2024. "Southern Germany’s innovation clusters: regional growth coalitions in the knowledge economy," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 126264, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
  14. Gary Herrigel, 2015. "Globalization and the German industrial production model [Globalisierung und das deutsche Modell der Industrieproduktion]," Journal for Labour Market Research, Springer;Institute for Employment Research/ Institut für Arbeitsmarkt- und Berufsforschung (IAB), vol. 48(2), pages 133-149, August.
  15. Rothstein, Sidney A., 2019. "Innovation and precarity: Workplace discourse in twenty-first century capitalism," MPIfG Discussion Paper 19/8, Max Planck Institute for the Study of Societies.
  16. Valenzuela, Jose Maria, 2023. "State ownership in liberal economic governance? De-risking private investment in the electricity sector in Mexico," World Development Perspectives, Elsevier, vol. 31(C).
  17. Kirchner, Stefan, 2013. "Embedded Flexibility Strategies and Diversity within Na-tional Institutional Frameworks: How many Flexibility Profiles are in the German Model?," management revue - Socio-Economic Studies, Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft mbH & Co. KG, vol. 24(1), pages 12-29.
  18. Abdelal Rawi, 2015. "The multinational firm and geopolitics: Europe, Russian energy, and power," Business and Politics, De Gruyter, vol. 17(3), pages 553-576, October.
  19. Wei Zhao, 2014. "From Industrial Policy to Upgrading Strategy: Dilemma of Local Developmental State in China's Pearl River Delta," China Economic Policy Review (CEPR), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 3(01), pages 1-32.
  20. Cody, John,, 2015. "How labor manages productivity advances and crisis response a comparative study of automotive manufacturing in Germany and the US," ILO Working Papers 994871573402676, International Labour Organization.
  21. Anke Hassel, 2014. "The Paradox of Liberalization — Understanding Dualism and the Recovery of the German Political Economy," British Journal of Industrial Relations, London School of Economics, vol. 52(1), pages 57-81, March.
  22. Nahm, Jonas & Steinfeld, Edward S., 2014. "Scale-up Nation: China’s Specialization in Innovative Manufacturing," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 54(C), pages 288-300.
  23. Marc Doussard & Greg Schrock & T William Lester, 2017. "Did US regions with manufacturing design generate more production jobs in the 2000s? New evidence on innovation and regional development," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 54(13), pages 3119-3137, October.
  24. Marc Doussard & Greg Schrock & Laura Wolf-Powers & Max Eisenburger & Stephen Marotta, 2018. "Manufacturing without the firm: Challenges for the maker movement in three U.S. cities," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 50(3), pages 651-670, May.
  25. Ian Clark, 2020. "Containing, embracing and hyper-activating Britishness: British-based foreign-owned firms," Economic and Industrial Democracy, Department of Economic History, Uppsala University, Sweden, vol. 41(4), pages 775-796, November.
  26. Daniel Erian Armanios & Charles E. Eesley, 2021. "How Do Institutional Carriers Alleviate Normative and Cognitive Barriers to Regulatory Change?," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 32(6), pages 1415-1438, November.
IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.