IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/r/hup/pbooks/9780674046467.html

Science-Mart: Privatizing American Science

Citations

Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
as


Cited by:

  1. Luna, Jessie K. & Dowd-Uribe, Brian, 2020. "Knowledge politics and the Bt cotton success narrative in Burkina Faso," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 136(C).
  2. Alexandra Waluszewski & Alessandro Cinti & Andrea Perna, 2021. "Antibiotics in pig meat production: restrictions as the odd case and overuse as normality? Experiences from Sweden and Italy," Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 8(1), pages 1-12, December.
  3. Altuğ Yalçıntaş, 2018. "n≥30 vs. n=all: Büyük Veri, Veri Obezitesi ve Kaybolan Nedensellikler," Yildiz Social Science Review, Yildiz Technical University, vol. 4(2), pages 153-166.
  4. Jean Léon Boucher & Diana Alfonso-Bécares & J. J. Larrabeiti-Rodríguez & Alejandro Marcos-Valls & Rony Mauricio Parra Jácome & Maddalena Ripa & Alireza Taghdisian & Raúl Velasco-Fernández & Keith Matt, 2025. "Where’s the data? Challenges in characterizing the sustainability of socioecological systems," Sustainability Nexus Forum, Springer, vol. 33(1), pages 1-18, December.
  5. Alex Huang, 2026. "Journal Impact Factor and Federal Reserve Monetary Policy: An Econometric Analysis Based on 1975-2026," Papers 2601.09618, arXiv.org.
  6. Sylvia Schwaag Serger & Mats Benner & Li Liu, 2015. "Chinese university governance: Tensions and reforms," Science and Public Policy, Oxford University Press, vol. 42(6), pages 871-886.
  7. Berry, Dominic J., 2020. "Making DNA and its becoming an experimental commodity," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 102532, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
  8. Fecher, Benedict & Wagner, Gert G., 2016. "Open Access, Innovation, and Research Infrastructure," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 4(2), pages 1-8.
  9. Kerry Holden, 2022. "The spectral scientists of corridor B: Neoliberalization and its ghosts in higher education," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 54(2), pages 330-346, March.
  10. Jeon, Heesang, 2015. "Knowledge and Contemporary Capitalism in Light of Marx's Value Theory," Thesis Commons g5njk, Center for Open Science.
  11. Smit, Jorrit, 2026. "Feasibility filtering in the funding arena: how techno-economic expectations shape research agendas at the chemistry/energy nexus," SocArXiv eqbaw_v1, Center for Open Science.
  12. Leland L. Glenna, 2017. "AFHVS 2017 presidential address," Agriculture and Human Values, Springer;The Agriculture, Food, & Human Values Society (AFHVS), vol. 34(4), pages 1021-1031, December.
  13. Michael David Maffie, 2023. "The mythology of ‘Big Data’ as a source of corporate power," British Journal of Industrial Relations, London School of Economics, vol. 61(3), pages 674-696, September.
  14. Shaw, Jamie, 2022. "There and back again: Revisiting Vannevar Bush, the linear model, and the freedom of science," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 51(10).
  15. Lai Ma, 2023. "Information, platformized," Journal of the Association for Information Science & Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 74(2), pages 273-282, February.
  16. Constantinos Alexiou & George Saridakis, 2025. "A Review of the Performance Metrics and Entrepreneurial Practices of Economics and Business Departments in UK Universities: A ‘Gresham’s Law’ Threat?," Journal of Entrepreneurship and Innovation in Emerging Economies, Entrepreneurship Development Institute of India, vol. 11(2), pages 281-308, July.
  17. Koen Beumer & Dirk Stemerding & Jac. A. A. Swart, 2021. "Innovation and the commons: lessons from the governance of genetic resources in potato breeding," Agriculture and Human Values, Springer;The Agriculture, Food, & Human Values Society (AFHVS), vol. 38(2), pages 525-539, June.
  18. Roberta Raffaetà & Luciano Ferrari, 2025. "From gut feelings to data assets: ethnographic explorations of the gut’s metabolic political economies," Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 12(1), pages 1-8, December.
  19. Mariana Mazzucato & Gregor Semieniuk, 2017. "Public financing of innovation: new questions," Oxford Review of Economic Policy, Oxford University Press and Oxford Review of Economic Policy Limited, vol. 33(1), pages 24-48.
  20. Benedikt Fecher & Gert G. Wagner, 2015. "Flipping journals to open: Rethinking publishing infrastructure," RatSWD Working Papers 251, German Data Forum (RatSWD).
  21. Esquivel-Sada, Daphne, 2022. "Responsible intellectual property rights? Untangling open-source biotech adherence to intellectual property rights through DIYbio," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 70(C).
  22. Andrea Saltelli & Monica Fiore, 2020. "From sociology of quantification to ethics of quantification," Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 7(1), pages 1-8, December.
  23. Jesper W. Schneider & Thed Leeuwen & Martijn Visser & Kaare Aagaard, 2019. "Examining national citation impact by comparing developments in a fixed and a dynamic journal set," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 119(2), pages 973-985, May.
  24. Petersen, Alan, 2013. "From bioethics to a sociology of bio-knowledge," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 98(C), pages 264-270.
  25. Lisa D. Cook & Janet Gerson & Jennifer Kuan, 2022. "Closing the Innovation Gap in Pink and Black," Entrepreneurship and Innovation Policy and the Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 1(1), pages 43-66.
  26. A. Basu & P. Foland & G. Holdridge & R. D. Shelton, 2018. "China’s rising leadership in science and technology: quantitative and qualitative indicators," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 117(1), pages 249-269, October.
  27. Rhian A. Salmon & Rebecca K. Priestley & Joanna Goven, 2017. "The reflexive scientist: an approach to transforming public engagement," Journal of Environmental Studies and Sciences, Springer;Association of Environmental Studies and Sciences, vol. 7(1), pages 53-68, March.
IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.