IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/pal/palcom/v12y2025i1d10.1057_s41599-025-04609-1.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

From gut feelings to data assets: ethnographic explorations of the gut’s metabolic political economies

Author

Listed:
  • Roberta Raffaetà

    (Cà Foscari Venice University)

  • Luciano Ferrari

    (University of Amsterdam)

Abstract

The paper contributes to ongoing discussions about the sociopolitical implications of microbiome research reflecting on the “metabolic political economy” of the gut and cautioning against overlooking the complex tensions and ambiguities inherent in the commercialization of microbial science. It investigates the multiple processes underlying the gut’s valuation practices in the context of interactions between academic research and a startup active in the field of wellness. We argue that over the last few decades, the (re)discovery of the gut and its microbiome as a symbiotic, ecological, sensing, and thinking organ has been appropriated and captured by a number of actors. Employing the working framework offered by the concept of “biovalue” and “assetization”, we focus on the wellness and digital health industry, their collaboration with academic research, and the resulting fragmentation of the gut’s valuation practices. Through the ethnographic exploration of a personalized nutrition startup based in the UK and its partnership with a research institution in Italy, we expose how gut microbiome knowledge production takes place at the intersection of multiple and complementary scientific, economic, and health-related values and expectations. Our study unveils a nuanced relationship between data, academic dynamics, and economic drivers, with data playing a determining role in the value acquisition of the gut, well beyond its progressive features. Critically, our analysis emphasizes the necessity to examine the sociopolitical implications and future health management scenarios resulting from the gut’s role as an asset.

Suggested Citation

  • Roberta Raffaetà & Luciano Ferrari, 2025. "From gut feelings to data assets: ethnographic explorations of the gut’s metabolic political economies," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 12(1), pages 1-8, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:pal:palcom:v:12:y:2025:i:1:d:10.1057_s41599-025-04609-1
    DOI: 10.1057/s41599-025-04609-1
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1057/s41599-025-04609-1
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1057/s41599-025-04609-1?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Mirowski, Philip, 2011. "Science-Mart: Privatizing American Science," Economics Books, Harvard University Press, number 9780674046467, march.
    2. Paul Langley, 2020. "Assets and assetization in financialized capitalism," Review of International Political Economy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 28(2), pages 382-393, October.
    3. Fabian Muniesa, 2014. "The Provoked Economy: Economic Reality and the Performative Turn," Post-Print halshs-00989576, HAL.
    4. Barbara Prainsack, 2020. "The political economy of digital data: introduction to the special issue," Policy Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 41(5), pages 439-446, September.
    5. Kean Birch & Fabian Muniesa, 2020. "Assetization: Turning Things into Assets in Technoscientific Capitalism," Post-Print halshs-02878684, HAL.
    6. Beth Greenhough & Cressida Jervis Read & Jamie Lorimer & Javier Lezaun & Carmen McLeod & Amber Benezra & Sally Bloomfield & Tim Brown & Megan Clinch & Fulvio D’Acquisto & Anna Dumitriu & Joshua Evans , 2020. "Setting the agenda for social science research on the human microbiome," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 6(1), pages 1-11, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Sarah Ruth Sippel, 2023. "Tackling land’s ‘stubborn materiality’: the interplay of imaginaries, data and digital technologies within farmland assetization," Agriculture and Human Values, Springer;The Agriculture, Food, & Human Values Society (AFHVS), vol. 40(3), pages 849-863, September.
    2. Golka, Philipp, 2024. "Assets and infrastructures," SocArXiv rbqm9, Center for Open Science.
    3. repec:osf:socarx:rbqm9_v1 is not listed on IDEAS
    4. Luna, Jessie K. & Dowd-Uribe, Brian, 2020. "Knowledge politics and the Bt cotton success narrative in Burkina Faso," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 136(C).
    5. Jeon, Heesang, 2015. "Knowledge and Contemporary Capitalism in Light of Marx's Value Theory," Thesis Commons g5njk, Center for Open Science.
    6. Benjamin Raimbault, 2021. "Kean Birch, 2019, Neoliberal Bio-Economies? The Co-Construction of Markets and Natures Palgrave MacMillan, 208 p," Post-Print hal-03559527, HAL.
    7. Benjamin Braun, 2016. "From performativity to political economy: index investing, ETFs and asset manager capitalism," New Political Economy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 21(3), pages 257-273, May.
    8. Andrea Pollio, 2020. "Architectures of millennial development: Entrepreneurship and spatial justice at the bottom of the pyramid in Cape Town," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 52(3), pages 573-592, May.
    9. Franck Aggeri, 2017. "How can performativity contribute to management and organization research? Theoretical perspectives and analytical framework [Qu'est-ce que la performativité peut apporter aux recherches en managem," Post-Print hal-01609172, HAL.
    10. Jelke R. Bosma, 2022. "Platformed professionalization: Labor, assets, and earning a livelihood through Airbnb," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 54(4), pages 595-610, June.
    11. Faulconbridge, James R. & Muzio, Daniel, 2021. "Valuation devices and the dynamic legitimacy-performativity nexus: The case of PEP in the English legal profession," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 91(C).
    12. Petersen, Alan, 2013. "From bioethics to a sociology of bio-knowledge," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 98(C), pages 264-270.
    13. Benedikt Fecher & Gert G. Wagner, 2016. "Open Access, Innovation, and Research Infrastructure," Publications, MDPI, vol. 4(2), pages 1-8, June.
    14. Fabian Muniesa, 2016. "You must fall down the rabbit hole," Journal of Cultural Economy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 9(3), pages 316-321, June.
    15. Robert Wade & Geraint Ellis, 2022. "Reclaiming the Windy Commons: Landownership, Wind Rights, and the Assetization of Renewable Resources," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(10), pages 1-31, May.
    16. Walter, Christian, 2016. "The financial Logos: The framing of financial decision-making by mathematical modelling," Research in International Business and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 37(C), pages 597-604.
    17. Mountford, Nicola & Geiger, Susi, 2024. "Public actor roles in market experiments: Innovating digital health markets in New York and Ireland," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 183(C).
    18. Lisa D. Cook & Janet Gerson & Jennifer Kuan, 2021. "Closing the Innovation Gap in Pink and Black," NBER Chapters, in: Entrepreneurship and Innovation Policy and the Economy, volume 1, pages 43-66, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    19. Esquivel-Sada, Daphne, 2022. "Responsible intellectual property rights? Untangling open-source biotech adherence to intellectual property rights through DIYbio," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 70(C).
    20. Cooiman, Franziska, 2022. "Imprinting the economy: The structural power of venture capital," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, issue OnlineFir, pages 1-1.
    21. Rafi Grosglik & Dan M. Kotliar, 2024. "Commodifying the microbial self: microbiome-based personalization and the quest for symbiotic singularity," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 11(1), pages 1-11, December.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:pal:palcom:v:12:y:2025:i:1:d:10.1057_s41599-025-04609-1. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.nature.com/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.