IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/r/hal/journl/halshs-02087847.html

Efficiency and Stability in Large Matching Markets

Citations

Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
as


Cited by:

  1. Yeon Koo Che & Olivier Tercieux, 2015. "An Analysis of Top Trading Cycles in Two-Sided Matching Markets," Levine's Bibliography 786969000000001059, UCLA Department of Economics.
  2. Ata Atay & Ana Mauleon & Vincent Vannetelbosch, 2025. "Limited Farsightedness in Priority‐Based Matching," Journal of Public Economic Theory, Association for Public Economic Theory, vol. 27(4), August.
  3. Flip Klijn, 2026. "Conditional Acceptance in School Choice," Working Papers 1582, Barcelona School of Economics.
  4. Klein, Thilo & Aue, Robert & Ortega, Josué, 2024. "School choice with independent versus consolidated districts," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 147(C), pages 170-205.
  5. Cantillon, Estelle & Chen, Li & Pereyra, Juan S., 2024. "Respecting priorities versus respecting preferences in school choice: When is there a trade-off?," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 148(C), pages 82-96.
  6. Amit Kumar & Nisheeth K. Vishnoi, 2025. "Matchings Under Biased and Correlated Evaluations," Papers 2510.23628, arXiv.org, revised Nov 2025.
  7. Song, Yangwei, 2023. "Approximate Bayesian implementation and exact maxmin implementation: An equivalence," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 139(C), pages 56-87.
  8. Estelle Cantillon & Li Chen & Juan Sebastian Pereyra Barreiro, 2022. "Respecting priorities versus respecting preferences in school choice: When is there a trade-off ?," Working Papers ECARES 2022-39, ULB -- Universite Libre de Bruxelles.
  9. Di Feng & Yun Liu, 2022. "On the Asymptotic Performance of Affirmative Actions in School Choice," Papers 2202.03927, arXiv.org, revised Dec 2022.
  10. Yash Kanoria & Seungki Min & Pengyu Qian, 2025. "The Competition for Partners in Matching Markets," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 71(6), pages 5230-5250, June.
  11. Avinatan Hassidim & Assaf Romm & Ran I. Shorrer, 2021. "The Limits of Incentives in Economic Matching Procedures," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 67(2), pages 951-963, February.
  12. Aue, Robert & Bach, Maximilian & Heigle, Julia & Klein, Thilo & Pfeiffer, Friedhelm & Zapp, Kristina, 2020. "The implication of school admission rules for segregation and educational inequality: Research report," ZEW Expertises, ZEW - Leibniz Centre for European Economic Research, number 223254.
  13. Nick Arnosti, 2023. "Lottery Design for School Choice," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 69(1), pages 244-259, January.
  14. Romero-Medina, Antonio & Triossi, Matteo, 2024. "Strategic priority-based course allocation," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 226(C).
  15. Ashlagi, Itai & Nikzad, Afshin, 2020. "What matters in school choice tie-breaking? How competition guides design," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 190(C).
  16. Mohammad Akbarpour & Julien Combe & YingHua He & Victor Hiller & Robert Shimer & Olivier Tercieux, 2025. "Unpaired Kidney Exchange: Overcoming Double Coincidence of Wants without Money," The Review of Economic Studies, Review of Economic Studies Ltd, vol. 92(4), pages 2108-2164.
  17. Di Feng & Yun Liu & Gaowang Wang, 2023. "On the Asymptotic Performance of Affirmative Actions in School Choice," Annals of Economics and Finance, Society for AEF, vol. 24(2), pages 289-307, November.
  18. Li, Mengling, 2020. "Ties matter: Improving efficiency in course allocation by allowing ties," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 178(C), pages 354-384.
  19. Ortega, Josué, 2018. "Social integration in two-sided matching markets," Journal of Mathematical Economics, Elsevier, vol. 78(C), pages 119-126.
  20. Ortega, Josué & Ziegler, Gabriel & Pablo Arribillaga, R. & Zhao, Geng, 2026. "The distribution of envy in matching markets," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 263(C).
  21. Che, Yeon-Koo & Tercieux, Olivier, 2018. "Payoff equivalence of efficient mechanisms in large matching markets," Theoretical Economics, Econometric Society, vol. 13(1), January.
  22. Behrang Kamali Shahdadi & Kourosh Khounsari, 2026. "A limit to envy in large matching markets with incomplete information," Review of Economic Design, Springer;Society for Economic Design, vol. 30(1), pages 45-82, February.
  23. Aaron L. Bodoh-Creed, 2020. "Optimizing for Distributional Goals in School Choice Problems," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 66(8), pages 3657-3676, August.
  24. Atay, Ata & Mauleon, Ana & Vannetelbosch, Vincent, 2025. "School choice with farsighted students," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 149(C), pages 148-163.
  25. Rajnish Kunar & Kriti Manocha & Josue Ortega, 2020. "On the integration of Shapley-Scarf housing markets," Papers 2004.09075, arXiv.org, revised Jan 2022.
  26. Ashlagi, Itai & Nikzad, Afshin & Romm, Assaf, 2019. "Assigning more students to their top choices: A comparison of tie-breaking rules," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 115(C), pages 167-187.
  27. Aue, Robert & Klein, Thilo & Ortega, Josué, 2020. "What happens when separate and unequal school districts merge?," ZEW Discussion Papers 20-032, ZEW - Leibniz Centre for European Economic Research.
  28. Georgy Artemov & Yeon-Koo Che & YingHua He, 2023. "Stable Matching with Mistaken Agents," Journal of Political Economy Microeconomics, University of Chicago Press, vol. 1(2), pages 270-320.
  29. Kumar, Rajnish & Manocha, Kriti & Ortega, Josué, 2022. "On the integration of Shapley–Scarf markets," Journal of Mathematical Economics, Elsevier, vol. 100(C).
  30. Song, Yangwei, 2022. "Approximate Bayesian Implementation and Exact Maxmin Implementation: An Equivalence," Rationality and Competition Discussion Paper Series 362, CRC TRR 190 Rationality and Competition.
  31. Kesten, Onur & Kurino, Morimitsu, 2019. "Strategy-proof improvements upon deferred acceptance: A maximal domain for possibility," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 117(C), pages 120-143.
IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.