IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/r/eee/matsoc/v35y1998i2p105-120.html

Strategy-proofness and single-plateaued preferences

Citations

Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
as


Cited by:

  1. John Weymark, 2011. "A unified approach to strategy-proofness for single-peaked preferences," SERIEs: Journal of the Spanish Economic Association, Springer;Spanish Economic Association, vol. 2(4), pages 529-550, December.
  2. Bossert, Walter & Peters, Hans, 2014. "Single-basined choice," Journal of Mathematical Economics, Elsevier, vol. 52(C), pages 162-168.
  3. Berga, Dolors & Serizawa, Shigehiro, 2000. "Maximal Domain for Strategy-Proof Rules with One Public Good," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 90(1), pages 39-61, January.
  4. Patrick Lederer, 2025. "Robust Voting Rules on the Interval Domain," Papers 2509.04874, arXiv.org.
  5. ,, 2009. "Strategy-proofness and single-crossing," Theoretical Economics, Econometric Society, vol. 4(2), June.
  6. Dolors Berga & Bernardo Moreno, 2009. "Strategic requirements with indifference: single-peaked versus single-plateaued preferences," Social Choice and Welfare, Springer;The Society for Social Choice and Welfare, vol. 32(2), pages 275-298, February.
  7. Doghmi, Ahmed & Ziad, Abderrahmane, 2015. "Nash implementation in private good economies with single-plateaued preferences and in matching problems," Mathematical Social Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 73(C), pages 32-39.
  8. Hideyuki Mizobuchi & Shigehiro Serizawa, 2006. "Maximal Domain for Strategy-proof Rules in Allotment Economies," Social Choice and Welfare, Springer;The Society for Social Choice and Welfare, vol. 27(1), pages 195-210, August.
  9. Ahmed Doghmi & Abderrahmane Ziad, 2013. "Nash Implementation in Private Good Economies with Single-Plateaued Preferences," Economics Working Paper Archive (University of Rennes & University of Caen) 201311, Center for Research in Economics and Management (CREM), University of Rennes, University of Caen and CNRS.
  10. Roy, Souvik & Sadhukhan, Soumyarup, 2021. "A unified characterization of the randomized strategy-proof rules," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 197(C).
  11. Bossert, Walter & Peters, Hans, 2013. "Single-plateaued choice," Mathematical Social Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 66(2), pages 134-139.
  12. Alcalde-Unzu, Jorge & Gallo, Oihane & Vorsatz, Marc, 2024. "Strategy-proofness with single-peaked and single-dipped preferences," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 147(C), pages 107-127.
  13. Dolors Berga, 2025. "A note on strategy-proofness and single-plateaued preferences," Economics Bulletin, AccessEcon, vol. 45(4), pages 1666-1671.
  14. Masso, Jordi & Neme, Alejandro, 2001. "Maximal Domain of Preferences in the Division Problem," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 37(2), pages 367-387, November.
  15. Bhattacharya, Mihir & Mukherjee, Saptarshi & Sonal, Ruhi & Venkatesh, Raghul S., 2024. "(Large) finite to continuum: An approximation result for electoral competition models," Journal of Mathematical Economics, Elsevier, vol. 113(C).
  16. Salvador Barberà, 2010. "Strategy-proof social choice," UFAE and IAE Working Papers 828.10, Unitat de Fonaments de l'Anàlisi Econòmica (UAB) and Institut d'Anàlisi Econòmica (CSIC).
  17. Levati, M. Vittoria & Nicholas, Aaron & Rai, Birendra, 2014. "Testing the single-peakedness of other-regarding preferences," European Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 67(C), pages 197-209.
  18. Gordon, Sidartha, 2007. "Public decisions: Solidarity and the status quo," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 61(2), pages 225-241, November.
  19. Parikshit De & Abinash Panda & Anup Pramanik, 2026. "Single-Peaked Domain Augmented with Complete Indifference: A Characterization of Target Rules with a Default," Papers 2603.17772, arXiv.org.
  20. Doghmi Ahmed, 2014. "Nash Implementation in Rationing Problems with Single-Crossing Preferences," Mathematical Economics Letters, De Gruyter, vol. 1(2-4), pages 69-74, July.
  21. Kumar, Ujjwal & Roy, Souvik, 2021. "Local incentive compatibility in ordinal type-spaces," MPRA Paper 110994, University Library of Munich, Germany.
  22. Shurojit Chatterji & Jordi Massó, 2015. "On Strategy-proofness and the Salience of Single-peakedness," Working Papers 828, Barcelona School of Economics.
  23. Chatterji, Shurojit & Massó, Jordi & Serizawa, Shigehiro, 2025. "On strategy-proofness and the salience of single-peakedness in a private goods allotment problem," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 150(C), pages 48-70.
  24. Oihane Gallo, 2026. "Type-Anonymity and Strategy-Proofness on a Domain of Single-Peaked and Single-Dipped Preferences," Working Papers 1563, Barcelona School of Economics.
  25. Abe, Takaaki, 2025. "Core thresholds of symmetric majority voting games," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 152(C), pages 199-215.
  26. Jordi MassóAuthor-Email: jordi.masso@uab.es & Alejandro Neme, 2002. "A Maximal Domain of Preferences for Tops-only Rules in the Division Problem," UFAE and IAE Working Papers 535.02, Unitat de Fonaments de l'Anàlisi Econòmica (UAB) and Institut d'Anàlisi Econòmica (CSIC).
  27. Alejandro Saporiti, 2006. "Strategic voting on single-crossing domains," Economics Discussion Paper Series 0617, Economics, The University of Manchester.
  28. Salvador Barberà & Dolors Berga & Bernardo Moreno, 2020. "Arrow on domain conditions: a fruitful road to travel," Social Choice and Welfare, Springer;The Society for Social Choice and Welfare, vol. 54(2), pages 237-258, March.
IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.