IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/r/eee/indorg/v25y2007i1p173-185.html

Welfare reductions from small cost reductions in differentiated oligopoly

Citations

Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
as


Cited by:

  1. Bittmann, Thomas & Loy, Jens-Peter & Anders, Sven, 2020. "Product differentiation and cost pass-through: industry-wide versus firm-specific cost shocks," Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society, vol. 64(04), January.
  2. Haiwen Zhou, 2014. "International Trade with Increasing Returns in the Transportation Sector," Frontiers of Economics in China-Selected Publications from Chinese Universities, Higher Education Press, vol. 9(4), pages 606-633, December.
  3. Aymeric Lardon, 2019. "On the coalitional stability of monopoly power in differentiated Bertrand and Cournot oligopolies," Theory and Decision, Springer, vol. 87(4), pages 421-449, November.
  4. Jens Jurgan, 2009. "Cost Variations in a Differentiated Good Oligopoly," Working Papers 069, Bavarian Graduate Program in Economics (BGPE).
  5. Susanne Wied-Nebbeling, 2007. "Fringe firms: Are they better off in a heterogeneous market?," Working Paper Series in Economics 31, University of Cologne, Department of Economics.
  6. X. Wang & Jingang Zhao, 2010. "Why are firms sometimes unwilling to reduce costs?," Journal of Economics, Springer, vol. 101(2), pages 103-124, October.
  7. Häckner, Jonas & Herzing, Mathias, 2016. "Welfare effects of taxation in oligopolistic markets," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 163(C), pages 141-166.
  8. Haiwen Zhou, 2014. "Intermediate Inputs and External Economies," Frontiers of Economics in China-Selected Publications from Chinese Universities, Higher Education Press, vol. 9(2), pages 216-239, June.
  9. Matsumura Toshihiro & Matsushima Noriaki, 2010. "When Small Firms Fight Back Against Large Firms in R&D Activities," The B.E. Journal of Economic Analysis & Policy, De Gruyter, vol. 10(1), pages 1-42, September.
  10. Nakayama, Yuji, 2009. "The impact of e-commerce: It always benefits consumers, but may reduce social welfare," Japan and the World Economy, Elsevier, vol. 21(3), pages 239-247, August.
  11. Céline Azémar & Rodolphe Desbordes & Paolo Melindi‐Ghidi & Jean‐Philippe Nicolaï, 2022. "Winners and losers of the COVID‐19 pandemic: An excess profits tax proposal," Journal of Public Economic Theory, Association for Public Economic Theory, vol. 24(5), pages 1016-1038, October.
  12. Dragan Jovanovic & Christian Wey & Mengxi Zhang, 2021. "On the social welfare effects of runner-up mergers in concentrated markets," Economics Bulletin, AccessEcon, vol. 41(4), pages 2330-2337.
  13. António Brandão & Joana Pinho, 2018. "Productivity Shocks in a Union‐Duopoly Model," Manchester School, University of Manchester, vol. 86(6), pages 722-756, December.
  14. Maximilian Koppenberg & Stefan Hirsch, 2022. "Markup estimation: A comparison of contemporary methods at the example of European food retailers," Agribusiness, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 38(1), pages 108-133, January.
  15. Zimmerman, Paul R. & Carlson, Julie A., 2010. "Competition and cost pass-through in differentiated oligopolies," MPRA Paper 25931, University Library of Munich, Germany.
  16. Volker Nocke & Nicolas Schutz, 2018. "Multiproduct‐Firm Oligopoly: An Aggregative Games Approach," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 86(2), pages 523-557, March.
  17. Choné, Philippe & Linnemer, Laurent, 2020. "Linear demand systems for differentiated goods: Overview and user’s guide," International Journal of Industrial Organization, Elsevier, vol. 73(C).
  18. Bittmann, Thomas & Loy, Jens-Peter & Anders, Sven, "undated". "Cost Pass-Through And Product Differentiation," 2017 International Congress, August 28-September 1, 2017, Parma, Italy 261145, European Association of Agricultural Economists.
  19. Zhe Yang, 2025. "The cooperative analysis of oligopoly TU markets with infinitely many firms," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 345(1), pages 517-532, February.
  20. Colin von Negenborn, 2023. "The more the merrier? On the optimality of market size restrictions," Review of Economic Design, Springer;Society for Economic Design, vol. 27(3), pages 603-634, September.
  21. Gayle, Philip & Lin, Ying, 2020. "Appendix to “Cost pass-through in Commercial Aviation: Theory and Evidence” – Theoretical Derivations," MPRA Paper 101973, University Library of Munich, Germany.
  22. Lapan, Harvey E. & Hennessy, David A., 2008. "Statistical moments analysis of production and welfare in multi-product Cournot oligopoly," International Journal of Industrial Organization, Elsevier, vol. 26(2), pages 598-606, March.
  23. Sutirtha Bandyopadhyay & Bharat Ramaswami, 2024. "Spillover Effects of Import Competition: Edible Oils in India," Working Papers 131, Ashoka University, Department of Economics.
  24. Philippe Choné & Laurent Linnemer, 2019. "The quasilinear quadratic utility model: an overview," CESifo Working Paper Series 7640, CESifo.
  25. Thijs Jansen & Arie Lier & Arjen Witteloostuijn, 2015. "Managerial delegation and welfare effects of cost reductions," Journal of Economics, Springer, vol. 116(1), pages 1-23, September.
  26. Hongkun Ma & Cheng-Zhong Qin & Chenhang Zeng, 2024. "Incentive and welfare implications of cross-holdings in oligopoly," Economic Theory, Springer;Society for the Advancement of Economic Theory (SAET), vol. 77(4), pages 975-997, June.
  27. Jurgan, Jens, 2009. "Conjectural cost variations in a differentiated good oligopoly," W.E.P. - Würzburg Economic Papers 80, University of Würzburg, Department of Economics.
  28. Meunier, David & Quinet, Emile, 2012. "Applications of transport economics and imperfect competition," Research in Transportation Economics, Elsevier, vol. 36(1), pages 19-29.
  29. Colacicco, Rudy, 2012. "The "Average" Within-Sector Firm Heterogeneity in General Oligopolistic Equilibrium," MPRA Paper 40212, University Library of Munich, Germany.
  30. Toshihiro Matsumura & Noriaki Matsushima, 2009. "A small firm leads to curious outcomes: Social surplus, consumer surplus, and R&D activities," ISER Discussion Paper 0742, Institute of Social and Economic Research, The University of Osaka.
IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.