IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/r/cup/apsrev/v93y1999i03p519-533_21.html

The Dynamics of Legislative Gridlock, 1947–96

Citations

Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
as


Cited by:

  1. Jonathan B Slapin, 2014. "Measurement, model testing, and legislative influence in the European Union," European Union Politics, , vol. 15(1), pages 24-42, March.
  2. Andreas Bernecker, 2015. "Divided Government and the Adoption of Economic Reforms," ifo DICE Report, ifo Institute - Leibniz Institute for Economic Research at the University of Munich, vol. 12(04), pages 47-52, January.
  3. Sverke R Saxegaard, 2025. "Careful what you promise: Executive constraints and conflict recurrence," Journal of Peace Research, Peace Research Institute Oslo, vol. 62(6), pages 1765-1782, November.
  4. Daniel L. Millimet & Travis Whitacre, 2025. "Partisan mortality cycles," Journal of Population Economics, Springer;European Society for Population Economics, vol. 38(4), pages 1-49, December.
  5. Michael M. Bechtel & Dirk Leuffen, 2010. "Forecasting European Union politics: Real-time forecasts in political time series analysis," European Union Politics, , vol. 11(2), pages 309-327, June.
  6. Myunghoon Kang, 2017. "Representation, sophisticated voting, and the size of the gridlock region," Journal of Theoretical Politics, , vol. 29(4), pages 623-646, October.
  7. Chris Den Hartog & Nathan Monroe, 2015. "The Jeffords switch and legislator rolls in the U.S. Senate," Public Choice, Springer, vol. 165(1), pages 25-43, October.
  8. Christopher S. Kelley & Bryan W. Marshall, 2010. "Going it Alone: The Politics of Signing Statements from Reagan to Bush II," Social Science Quarterly, Southwestern Social Science Association, vol. 91(1), pages 168-187, March.
  9. Bernecker, Andreas, 2016. "Divided we reform? Evidence from US welfare policies," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 142(C), pages 24-38.
  10. repec:ces:ifodic:v:12:y:2015:i:4:p:19149990 is not listed on IDEAS
  11. Luca Repetto & Maximiliano Sosa Andrés, 2022. "Divided Government and Polarization: Regression-Discontinuity Evidence from US States," CESifo Working Paper Series 9823, CESifo.
  12. Dimiter Toshkov, 2011. "Public opinion and policy output in the European Union: A lost relationship," European Union Politics, , vol. 12(2), pages 169-191, June.
  13. Kira Killermann, 2016. "Loose Ties or Strong Bonds? The Effect of a Commissioner's Nationality and Partisanship on Voting in the Council," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 54(6), pages 1367-1383, November.
  14. Ian Ostrander & Joel Sievert, 2020. "Presidential Communication During the Legislative Process," Social Science Quarterly, Southwestern Social Science Association, vol. 101(3), pages 1165-1182, May.
  15. Chengguang Li & Rodrigo Isidor & Luis Alfonso Dau & Rudy Kabst, 2018. "The More the Merrier? Immigrant Share and Entrepreneurial Activities," Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, , vol. 42(5), pages 698-733, September.
  16. Gersbach, Hans & Tejada, Oriol & Muller, Philippe, 2016. "The Effects of Higher Re-election Hurdles and Costs of Policy Change on Political Polarization," CEPR Discussion Papers 11375, Centre for Economic Policy Research.
  17. Krehbiel, Keith & Peskowitz, Zachary, 2012. "Legislative Organization and Ideal-Point Bias," Research Papers 2124, Stanford University, Graduate School of Business.
  18. Livnat, Joshua & Rubin, Amir & Segal, Dan, 2025. "Divided we fall: Congressional cycles, the stock market and firm performance," Journal of Corporate Finance, Elsevier, vol. 92(C).
  19. Salvatore Barbaro, 2021. "A social-choice perspective on authoritarianism and political polarization," Working Papers 2108, Gutenberg School of Management and Economics, Johannes Gutenberg-Universität Mainz.
  20. Gersbach, Hans & Muller, Philippe & Tejada, Oriol, 2019. "Costs of change and political polarization," European Journal of Political Economy, Elsevier, vol. 60(C).
  21. Schelker, Mark, 2018. "Lame ducks and divided government: How voters control the unaccountable," Journal of Comparative Economics, Elsevier, vol. 46(1), pages 131-144.
  22. Gustavo Adolfo Caballero Orozco, 2016. "Luck and Effort: Learning about Income from Friends and Neighbors," 2016 Papers pca706, Job Market Papers.
  23. Min-Seok Pang & Russell J. Funk & Daniel Hirschman, 2024. "We Fly Congress: Market Actions as Corporate Political Activity in the U.S. Airline Industry," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 35(4), pages 1251-1270, July.
  24. Erasmus Kersting & Christopher Kilby, 2021. "Do domestic politics shape U.S. influence in the World Bank?," The Review of International Organizations, Springer, vol. 16(1), pages 29-58, January.
  25. Hans Gersbach & Fikri Pitsuwan & Giovanni Valvassori Bolgè, 2024. "Volatility and Resilience of Democratic Public-Good Provision," CESifo Working Paper Series 11004, CESifo.
  26. Jason Webb Yackee & Susan Webb Yackee, 2009. "Divided government and US federal rulemaking," Regulation & Governance, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 3(2), pages 128-144, June.
  27. De Clercq, Dirk & Meuleman, Miguel & Wright, Mike, 2012. "A cross-country investigation of micro-angel investment activity: The roles of new business opportunities and institutions," International Business Review, Elsevier, vol. 21(2), pages 117-129.
  28. Tracey Bark & Elizabeth Bell & Ani Ter‐Mkrtchyan, 2024. "Regulation timing in the states: The role of divided government and legislative recess," Regulation & Governance, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 18(4), pages 1369-1394, October.
  29. J. Mitchell Pickerill & Cynthia J. Bowling, 2014. "Polarized Parties, Politics, and Policies: Fragmented Federalism in 2013–2014," Publius: The Journal of Federalism, CSF Associates Inc., vol. 44(3), pages 369-398.
  30. Li, Pei & Tang, Leo & Cloyd, C. Bryan, 2024. "Political polarization and state government bonds," Global Finance Journal, Elsevier, vol. 63(C).
  31. Andreas Bernecker, 2015. "Divided Government and the Adoption of Economic Reforms," ifo DICE Report, ifo Institute - Leibniz Institute for Economic Research at the University of Munich, vol. 12(4), pages 47-52, 01.
IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.