IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/zbw/wzbpre/p2018004.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Prekarität in Deutschland?!

Author

Listed:
  • Stuth, Stefan
  • Schels, Brigitte
  • Promberger, Markus
  • Jahn, Kerstin
  • Allmendinger, Jutta

Abstract

Vor dem Hintergrund der sozialen Marktwirtschaft wird Prekarität als eine Folge von arbeitsmarkt- und sozialpolitischen Veränderungen diskutiert. Es wird bilanziert, dass der soziale Zusammenhalt der Arbeitsgesellschaft in Deutschland gefährdet ist. Im Anschluss an diese Diskussion geht die vorliegende Studie empirisch der Frage nach, ob ein Prekariat existiert: Gibt es Personengruppen, die trotz Erwerbstätigkeit dauerhaft in Unsicherheit leben? Konzentriert sich Prekarität hauptsächlich auf geringqualifizierte Personen oder ist sie vor allem an bestimmte Lebensphasen und -übergänge gebunden? Damit Prekarität in ihren verschiedenen Facetten und Abstufungen erfasst werden kann, wird in dem vorliegenden Papier ein umfassendes Set an Indikatoren zur quantitativen, multidimensionalen Messung von (kumulativer) Prekarität vorgestellt. Auf Basis des Sozioökonomischen Panels (SOEP) werden je sieben Indikatoren operationalisiert, mit denen sowohl prekäre Beschäftigung als auch prekäre Haushaltslagen erfasst und im Zeitverlauf (1993-2012) analysiert werden können. Damit soll der Grundstein für eine quantitative Analyse von Prekarität gelegt werden, um vor diesem Hintergrund die Institutionen des Arbeitsmarkts und der sozialen Sicherung zukünftig neu bewerten zu können.

Suggested Citation

  • Stuth, Stefan & Schels, Brigitte & Promberger, Markus & Jahn, Kerstin & Allmendinger, Jutta, 2018. "Prekarität in Deutschland?!," Discussion Papers, Presidential Department P 2018-004, WZB Berlin Social Science Center.
    • Handle: RePEc:zbw:wzbpre:p2018004
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/181862/1/1029359598.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Stuth, Stefan, 2017. "Zusammenhänge zwischen Beruf und befristeter Beschäftigung," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, issue 1, pages 110-122.
    2. Bartelheimer, Peter, 2011. "Unsichere Erwerbsbeteiligung und Prekarität," WSI-Mitteilungen, Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft mbH & Co. KG, vol. 64(8), pages 386-393.
    3. Daniela Vono de Vilhena & Yuliya Kosyakova & Elina Kilpi-Jakonen & Patricia McMullin, 2016. "Does adult education contribute to securing non-precarious employment? A cross-national comparison," Work, Employment & Society, British Sociological Association, vol. 30(1), pages 97-117, February.
    4. Allmendinger, Jutta & Jahn, Kerstin & Promberger, Markus & Schels, Brigitte & Stuth, Stefan, 2018. "Prekäre Beschäftigung und unsichere Haushaltslagen im Lebensverlauf: Gibt es in Deutschland ein verfestigtes Prekariat ?," WSI-Mitteilungen, Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft mbH & Co. KG, vol. 71(4), pages 259-269.
    5. Schmid, Günther & Protsch, Paula, 2009. "Wandel der Erwerbsformen in Deutschland und Europa," Discussion Papers, Research Unit: Skill Formation and Labor Markets SP I 2009-505, WZB Berlin Social Science Center.
    6. Allmendinger, Jutta & Hipp, Lena & Stuth, Stefan, 2013. "Atypical employment in Europe 1996-2011," Discussion Papers, Presidential Department P 2013-003, WZB Berlin Social Science Center.
    7. Wayne Lewchuk & Marlea Clarke & Alice de Wolff, 2008. "Working without commitments: precarious employment and health," Work, Employment & Society, British Sociological Association, vol. 22(3), pages 387-406, September.
    8. Bellmann Lutz & Stegmaier Jens, 2011. "Einfacharbeit in der Krise? / Low-Skilled Work in Crisis?," Arbeit, De Gruyter, vol. 20(3), pages 188-205, September.
    9. Stuth, Stefan, 2017. "Closing in on Closure. Occupational Closure and Temporary Employment in Germany," EconStor Books, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, volume 1, number 201802, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Stuth, Stefan & Jahn, Kerstin, 2020. "Young, successful, precarious? Precariousness at the entry stage of employment careers in Germany," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 23(6), pages 702-725.
    2. Herr, Hansjörg & Ruoff, Bea, 2019. "The development of the German labour market after World War II," IPE Working Papers 114/2019, Berlin School of Economics and Law, Institute for International Political Economy (IPE).
    3. Hipp, Lena & Molitor, Friederike & Leschke, Janine & Bekker, Sonja, 2017. "Teilzeitväter? Deutschland, Schweden, Irland und die Niederlande im Vergleich," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 29(1), pages 32-48.
    4. Brendan Burchell, 2011. "A Temporal Comparison of the Effects of Unemployment and Job Insecurity on Wellbeing," Sociological Research Online, , vol. 16(1), pages 66-78, February.
    5. Bernard Michael Gilroy & Julia Günthner, 2017. "The German Precariat and the Role of Fundamental Security - Is the Unconditional Basic Income a Possible Solution for the Growing Precarity in Germany?," Working Papers CIE 109, Paderborn University, CIE Center for International Economics.
    6. Vivek Sharma & Sudhir K. Jain, 2020. "Extending Habitus to Employment Preferences: Identifying Social-actors Influencing Employment Choices Including Self-employment Among Youth in J&K (India)," Journal of Entrepreneurship and Innovation in Emerging Economies, Entrepreneurship Development Institute of India, vol. 6(2), pages 261-281, July.
    7. Hipp, Lena & Sauermann, Armin & Stuth, Stefan, 2021. "Führung in Teilzeit? Eine empirische Analyse zur Verbreitung von Teilzeitarbeit unter Führungskräften in Deutschland und Europa," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics.
    8. Marco Guerrazzi & Ilham Ksebi, 2019. "Measuring Unemployment by Means of Official Data and Administrative Records: Empirical and Theoretical Perspectives," QUADERNI DI ECONOMIA DEL LAVORO, FrancoAngeli Editore, vol. 2019(110), pages 17-49.
    9. Jeni Hebert-Beirne & Jennifer K. Felner & Teresa Berumen & Sylvia Gonzalez & Melissa Mosley Chrusfield & Preethi Pratap & Lorraine M. Conroy, 2021. "Community Resident Perceptions of and Experiences with Precarious Work at the Neighborhood Level: The Greater Lawndale Healthy Work Project," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(21), pages 1-18, October.
    10. Giesecke, Johannes & Groß, Martin & Stuth, Stefan, 2020. "Occupational Closure and Wage Inequality: How Occupational Closure Effects Vary Between Workers [Wie berufliche Schließungseffekte zwischen Arbeitnehmergruppen variieren]," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 72(S1), pages 157-195.
    11. Heinz-J. Bontrup, 2011. "Mit noch mehr indirekten Steuern zurück zum wohlfahrtsorientierten Staat?: Nur Luxussteuern wären ein richtiger Weg," Vierteljahrshefte zur Wirtschaftsforschung / Quarterly Journal of Economic Research, DIW Berlin, German Institute for Economic Research, vol. 80(4), pages 189-208.
    12. Schulze Buschoff, Karin, 2016. "Atypische Beschäftigung in Europa - Herausforderungen für die Alterssicherung und die gewerkschaftliche Interessenvertretung," WSI Studies 01, The Institute of Economic and Social Research (WSI), Hans Böckler Foundation.
    13. Berndt Keller & Hartmut Seifert, 2013. "Atypical employment in Germany. Forms, development, patterns1," Transfer: European Review of Labour and Research, , vol. 19(4), pages 457-474, November.
    14. Myounghwan Kim & Giseung Kim, 2023. "Effect of Korean trade union on wage discrimination between regular and irregular workers," Asian Economic Journal, East Asian Economic Association, vol. 37(1), pages 3-24, March.
    15. Hielke Buddelmeyer & Duncan McVicar & Mark Wooden, 2015. "Non-Standard “Contingent” Employment and Job Satisfaction: A Panel Data Analysis," Industrial Relations: A Journal of Economy and Society, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 54(2), pages 256-275, April.
    16. Karlsson, Tobias, 2015. "Dimensions of Precarity: A Contradictory Case of Non-Standard Employment," Lund Papers in Economic History 137, Lund University, Department of Economic History.
    17. Schulte-Braucks, Philipp, 2013. "Von Schweden lernen: Weiterbildung gering Qualifizierter im Rahmen der kommunalen Erwachsenenbildung (Komvux)," Discussion Papers, Research Unit: Skill Formation and Labor Markets SP I 2013-502, WZB Berlin Social Science Center.
    18. Shanting Zheng & Tangli Ding & Hao Chen & Yunhong Wu & Wenjing Cai, 2021. "Precarious Job Makes Me Withdraw? The Role of Job Insecurity and Negative Affect," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(24), pages 1-15, December.
    19. Tauhid Hossain Khan & Ellen MacEachen & Debra Dunstan, 2022. "What Social Supports Are Available to Self-Employed People When Ill or Injured? A Comparative Policy Analysis of Canada and Australia," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(9), pages 1-23, April.
    20. Mireia Julià & Fabrizio Méndez-Rivero & Álex Gómez-Gómez & Óscar J. Pozo & Mireia Bolíbar, 2022. "Association between Precarious Employment and Chronic Stress: Effect of Gender, Stress Measurement and Precariousness Dimensions—A Cross-Sectional Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(15), pages 1-14, July.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    prekäre Beschäftigung; prekäre Haushaltslagen; Prekariat; soziale Indikatoren; soziale Ungleichheit; Dauerbeobachtung;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • I31 - Health, Education, and Welfare - - Welfare, Well-Being, and Poverty - - - General Welfare, Well-Being
    • I38 - Health, Education, and Welfare - - Welfare, Well-Being, and Poverty - - - Government Programs; Provision and Effects of Welfare Programs
    • J81 - Labor and Demographic Economics - - Labor Standards - - - Working Conditions

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:zbw:wzbpre:p2018004. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/wzbbbde.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.