IDEAS home Printed from
MyIDEAS: Login to save this paper or follow this series

Indikatoren im Capability-Ansatz und der Bezug zur Nachhaltigkeit: Welchen Beitrag kann der CA leisten?

  • Leßmann, Ortrud
Registered author(s):

    Für den Capability Ansatz (CA) sind in empirischen Studien viele Indikatoren entwickelt worden. Der vorliegende Aufsatz untersucht, welchen Beitrag diese Indikatoren zur Nachhaltigkeitsforschung leisten können. Nach einer kurzen Einführung in Struktur und Begrifflichkeiten des CA wird zunächst die Frage aufgeworfen, welche Dimensionen relevant sind bzw. nach welchen Kriterien sie ausgewählt werden können. In einem zweiten Schritt wird die Auswahl von Indikatoren für die Dimensionen angesprochen. Ein Merkmal des CA ist die besondere Rolle, die er der (Wahl-)Freiheit einräumt. Daher widmet sich ein Abschnitt der Erfassung von Freiheit mittels Indikatoren. Der fünfte Abschnitt gibt einen Überblick über die Behandlung von Umwelt und Nachhaltigkeit in bisherigen empirischen Studien zum CA. Das Fazit weist darauf hin, dass es in den meisten empirischen Studien zum CA um die Bewertung einer Situation geht und nicht um Handlungsempfehlungen. Im Kontext der Nachhaltigkeit ist das letztere interessanter. Allgemein bleibt der Eindruck, dass sowohl der Bereich Umwelt als auch die Frage nach der Nachhaltigkeit noch nicht gut in den CA integriert worden sind. Im Anhang wird zur Illustration auf der Grundlage der vorangegangenen Überlegungen ein Vorschlag für Fragen zu nachhaltigem Verhalten gemacht.

    If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.

    File URL:
    Download Restriction: no

    Paper provided by Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research (UFZ), Division of Social Sciences (ÖKUS) in its series UFZ Discussion Papers with number 16/2012.

    in new window

    Date of creation: 2012
    Date of revision:
    Handle: RePEc:zbw:ufzdps:162012
    Contact details of provider: Postal: Permoserstraße 15, 04318 Leipzig
    Phone: ++49 - 0341 - 235-2771
    Fax: ++49 - 0341 - 235-2825
    Web page:

    More information through EDIRC

    References listed on IDEAS
    Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.:

    as in new window
    1. Paul Anand & Graham Hunter & Ron Smith, 2004. "Capabilities and Wellbeing: Evidence Based on the Sen-Nussbaum Approach to Welfare," Open Discussion Papers in Economics 47, The Open University, Faculty of Social Sciences, Department of Economics.
    2. Polishchuk, Yuliana & Rauschmayer, Felix, 2011. "Ecosystem effects on well-being: More than just "benefits"? Looking at ecosystem services through the capability approach," UFZ Discussion Papers 6/2011, Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research (UFZ), Division of Social Sciences (ÖKUS).
    3. Erik SCHOKKAERT & Luc VAN OOTEGEM, 1990. "Sen's Concept of the Living Standard applied to the Belgian Unemployed," Discussion Papers (REL - Recherches Economiques de Louvain) 1990039, Université catholique de Louvain, Institut de Recherches Economiques et Sociales (IRES).
    4. Anand, Paul & van Hees, Martin, 2006. "Capabilities and achievements: An empirical study," Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics (formerly The Journal of Socio-Economics), Elsevier, vol. 35(2), pages 268-284, April.
    5. Paul Anand & Cristina Santos & Ron Smith, 2007. "The measurement of capabilities," Open Discussion Papers in Economics 67, The Open University, Faculty of Social Sciences, Department of Economics.
    6. Di Tommaso, Maria Laura, 2007. "Children capabilities: A structural equation model for India," Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics (formerly The Journal of Socio-Economics), Elsevier, vol. 36(3), pages 436-450, June.
    7. Paul Anand & Graham Hunter & Ian Carter & Keith Dowding & Francesco Guala & Martin Van Hees, 2009. "The Development of Capability Indicators," Journal of Human Development and Capabilities, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 10(1), pages 125-152.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

    When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:zbw:ufzdps:162012. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (ZBW - German National Library of Economics)

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

    If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis using RePEc data.