IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/zbw/penwps/338100.html

Is GDP growth necessary to maintain pensions? An empirical analysis of public pension spending and benefits in the OECD

Author

Listed:
  • Palomera, David
  • Starke, Peter

Abstract

The literature on growth dependencies increasingly calls for post-growth welfare states capable of functioning without reliance on GDP growth in order to remain within planetary limits. Yet empirical research on the relationship between welfare state arrangements and economic growth remains remarkably scarce, even in policy domains where growth dependence appears most plausible, such as pensions. Using panel data of 20 OECD countries from 1971 to 2022, we examine the relationship between public pension spending per capita and replacement rates (i.e. benefit generosity) on the one hand, and GDP per capita on the other. We find that while pension spending per capita remains partially coupled to GDP, pension replacement rates have become decoupled - and in many instances negatively coupled - already at relatively modest income levels. This is consistent with the literature on the social limits to growth, where decoupling likewise occurs at modest income levels. We find that labor-market factors - especially labor participation - are consistently and strongly associated with higher pension benefits. These findings have important policy implications, highlighting that the sustainability of pension systems in post-growth contexts may depend less on infinite economic expansion than on institutional and labor-market policy choices.

Suggested Citation

  • Palomera, David & Starke, Peter, 2026. "Is GDP growth necessary to maintain pensions? An empirical analysis of public pension spending and benefits in the OECD," Working Paper Series 01/2026, Post-Growth Economics Network (PEN).
  • Handle: RePEc:zbw:penwps:338100
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/338100/1/1965096123.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:zbw:penwps:338100. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.postgrowtheconomics.org/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.