IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/zbw/kdifoc/v51y2015p1-12.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Lessons from the Dispute over Korea's Digital Certification Regulation and Policy Suggestions for Electronic Commerce

Author

Listed:
  • Song, Yeongkwan

Abstract

For e-commerce to serve as a platform for innovation, all forthcoming regulations on e-commerce must adhere to the principles of technological neutrality and private sector-driven leadership and should include additional policy goals of enhancing consumer benefit and protection. It is important to consistently develop and implement policies that reflect the different roles of government and the private sector, and resolve the fragmentation within government ministries. - Dispute over digital certification has been ongoing for the past ten years with respect to its mandatory use as a means to verify personal identity in online banking and electronic commerce. - Digital certification was adopted "to ensure the safety and reliability of electronic messages and to promote their use" in response to the expansion of electronic transactions. - The principle of technological neutrality was adopted in the revised Digital Signature Act which went into effect in April 2002. - Although the government implemented the mandatory use of digital certification in 2002, it was only legislated in 2007. - It was after the 1st Ministerial Meeting on Regulatory Reform and Public-Private Joint Regulatory Reform Conference held by the President on March 20th, 2014 that the government became active in the establishment of improvement measures. - The latest revision of the Electronic Financial Transactions Act does not recognize the FSC's authority over the choice of authentication method e.g. digital certification. - Digital certification may be a safe authentication method for financial institutions and electronic financial service providers, but it does not guarantee consumers' security as it is exposed to the risks of loss or hacking. - Between January and September 2014, a total of 19,388 digital certificates were reportedly leaked, and consumer damages caused by phishing and pharming sites are growing rapidly. - The regulation on digital certification serves to reduce investment in the information security of e-commerce providers. Indeed, according to relevant data, Korean companies have invested little in IT security and the number of encryption patents is very small. - The government should develop and implement comprehensive, organic measures by resoling fragmentation issues within different ministries. - The mandated use of digital certification in electronic financial transactions has resulted in the standardization of authentication methods. And, although this may have its merits, in an industry like e-commerce which undergoes rapid technological progress, a hasty approach of standardization could cripple investment in and innovation of new technologies. Forthcoming regulations on e-commerce should fully respect the principles of technological neutrality and private sector-driven leadership in accordance to the US-Korea Joint Statement on Electronic Commerce. Korea suffers from a significantly higher number of personal information leaks per 100,000 persons than the US. All forthcoming regulations on e-commerce should have additional policy goals on consumer benefit and protection.

Suggested Citation

  • Song, Yeongkwan, 2016. "Lessons from the Dispute over Korea's Digital Certification Regulation and Policy Suggestions for Electronic Commerce," KDI Focus 51, Korea Development Institute (KDI).
  • Handle: RePEc:zbw:kdifoc:v:51:y:2015:p:1-12
    DOI: 10.22740/kdi.focus.e.2015.51
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/200853/1/kdi-focus-51.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22740/kdi.focus.e.2015.51?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Acemoglu, Daron & Gancia, Gino & Zilibotti, Fabrizio, 2012. "Competing engines of growth: Innovation and standardization," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 147(2), pages 570-601.3.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Nordin, Nur Naddia & Nordin, Nur Haiza, 2016. "Determinants of Innovation in Developing Countries: A Panel Generalized Method of Moments Analysis," Jurnal Ekonomi Malaysia, Faculty of Economics and Business, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, vol. 50(2), pages 93-105.
    2. Daron Acemoglu & Gino Gancia & Fabrizio Zilibotti, 2015. "Offshoring and Directed Technical Change," American Economic Journal: Macroeconomics, American Economic Association, vol. 7(3), pages 84-122, July.
    3. Curzi, Daniele & Raimondi, Valentina & Olper, Alessandro, 2013. "Quality Upgrading, Competition and Trade Policy: Evidence from the Agri-Food Sector," 2013: Productivity and Its Impacts on Global Trade, June 2-4, 2013. Seville, Spain 152386, International Agricultural Trade Research Consortium.
    4. Huang, Siyu & Shi, Yi & Chen, Qinghua & Li, Xiaomeng, 2022. "The growth path of high-tech industries: Statistical laws and evolution demands," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 603(C).
    5. Alcalá, Francisco & Solaz, Marta, 2018. "International Relocation of Production and Growth," CEPR Discussion Papers 13422, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.
    6. Caroline Buts & Ellen Van Droogenbroeck & Michaël R. J. Dooms & Kim Willems, 2020. "The Economic Impact of Standards in Belgium," International Journal of Standardization Research (IJSR), IGI Global, vol. 18(1), pages 44-64, January.
    7. Elvis Dze Achuo & Tii N. Nchofoung & Simplice A. Asongu & Gildas Dohba Dinga, 2021. "Unravelling the Mysteries of Underdevelopment in Africa," Research Africa Network Working Papers 21/073, Research Africa Network (RAN).
    8. Song, Yanwu & Zhang, Jinrui & Song, Yingkang & Fan, Xinran & Zhu, Yuqing & Zhang, Chen, 2020. "Can industry-university-research collaborative innovation efficiency reduce carbon emissions?," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 157(C).
    9. Lee, Won Sang & Sohn, So Young, 2018. "Effects of standardization on the evolution of information and communications technology," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 132(C), pages 308-317.
    10. Bessonova, Evguenia & Gonchar, Ksenia, 2019. "How the innovation-competition link is shaped by technology distance in a high-barrier catch-up economy," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 86, pages 15-32.
    11. Daria Onori, 2015. "Competition and Growth: Reinterpreting their Relationship," Manchester School, University of Manchester, vol. 83(4), pages 398-422, July.
    12. Song, Wenfei & Han, Xianfeng, 2022. "The bilateral effects of foreign direct investment on green innovation efficiency: Evidence from 30 Chinese provinces," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 261(PB).
    13. Jussi Heikkilä & Timo Ali-Vehmas & Julius Rissanen, 2021. "The Link Between Standardization and Economic Growth: A Bibliometric Analysis," International Journal of Standardization Research (IJSR), IGI Global, vol. 19(1), pages 1-25, January.
    14. Oya Eru, 2018. "Digital Marketing Suggestions for Luxury Brands," European Journal of Multidisciplinary Studies Articles, Revistia Research and Publishing, vol. 3, January -.
    15. , & Lorenz, Jan & ,, 2016. "Innovation vs. imitation and the evolution of productivity distributions," Theoretical Economics, Econometric Society, vol. 11(3), September.
    16. Gino Gancia & Andreas Müller & Fabrizio Zilibotti, 2010. "Structural development accounting," Economics Working Papers 1249, Department of Economics and Business, Universitat Pompeu Fabra, revised Feb 2011.
    17. Huaide Wen & Jun Dai, 2021. "Green Technological Progress and the Backwardness Advantage of Green Development: Taking the Sustainable Development Strategy of Central and Western China as an Example," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(14), pages 1-17, July.
    18. Raven, Michael & Blind, Knut, 2017. "The characteristics and impacts of scientific publications in biotechnology research referenced in standards," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 115(C), pages 167-179.
    19. Umberto Garfagnini & Bruno Strulovici, 2012. "Social Learning and Innovation Cycles (revision of DP#1516, The Dynamics of Innovation)," Discussion Papers 1546, Northwestern University, Center for Mathematical Studies in Economics and Management Science.
    20. Sun, Yunpeng & Razzaq, Asif & Sun, Huaping & Irfan, Muhammad, 2022. "The asymmetric influence of renewable energy and green innovation on carbon neutrality in China: Analysis from non-linear ARDL model," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 193(C), pages 334-343.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:zbw:kdifoc:v:51:y:2015:p:1-12. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/kdiiikr.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.