IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/zbw/ifwkpb/71.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Treibt Spekulation die Rohstoffpreise in die Höhe?

Author

Listed:
  • Finger, Karl
  • Reitz, Stefan

Abstract

[Einleitung] Die enormen Preisanstiege auf fast allen Märkten für Rohstoffe und landwirtschaftliche Grunderzeugnisse werden in Politik und Öffentlichkeit mit der zunehmenden Spekulationstätigkeit und allgemein der fortschreitenden Finanzialisierung' der Märkte in Verbindung gebracht. Das Interesse der Medien und Öffentlichkeit bezieht sich dabei vornehmlich auf Grundnahrungsmittel und die potenziell negativen Verteilungseffekte der Spekulation. Beispielsweise findet man in der Presse, dass das Engagement von Handelshäusern wie Deutsche Bank oder Allianz auf Rohstoffmärkten hohe Nahrungsmittelpreise für die Bevölkerung in Schwellenländern zur Folge haben. Foodwatch (2013) veröffentlichte einige interne Dokumente beider Handelshäuser, in welchen auf eine mögliche Zunahme von Preisschwankungen und negative Rückwirkungen für Konsumenten und Produzenten nicht nur in Entwicklungsländern hingewiesen wurde. In einem Artikel der Süddeutschen Zeitung wird die Finanzialisierung der Rohstoffmärkte ebenfalls als riskante Fehlentwicklung eingeschätzt, die nur durch stärkere Regulierung einzudämmen sei. Im Gegensatz zur öffentlichen Wahrnehmung sind volkswirtschaftliche Untersuchungen bis heute zu keinem eindeutigen Ergebnis gekommen. Neben den möglichen spekulativen Verzerrungen spielen auch fundamentalorientierte Erklärungen, wie beispielsweise das starke Wirtschaftswachstum der Schwellenländer oder die starke Expansion der globalen Liquidität, für die beobachteten Preisanstiege eine wichtige Rolle. Dabei ist die Frage, ob Preisänderungen durch Spekulation hervorgerufen werden und nicht mehr auf das Zusammenspiel von fundamentalen Angebots- und Nachfragekomponenten reagieren, von hoher volkswirtschaftlicher Bedeutung. Verwerfungen bei der Preisbildung führen zur Fehlallokation der Ressourcen und könnten wirtschaftspolitische Gegenmaßnahmen erfordern. Der vorliegende Beitrag beschäftigt sich mit der Frage, ob destabilisierende Spekulation auf den Rohstoffmärkten tatsächlich nachgewiesen werden kann.

Suggested Citation

  • Finger, Karl & Reitz, Stefan, 2014. "Treibt Spekulation die Rohstoffpreise in die Höhe?," Kiel Policy Brief 71, Kiel Institute for the World Economy (IfW Kiel).
    • Handle: RePEc:zbw:ifwkpb:71
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/93034/1/779279956.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Toda, Hiro Y. & Yamamoto, Taku, 1995. "Statistical inference in vector autoregressions with possibly integrated processes," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 66(1-2), pages 225-250.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Cagli, Efe Caglar & Taskin, Dilvin & Evrim Mandaci, Pınar, 2019. "The short- and long-run efficiency of energy, precious metals, and base metals markets: Evidence from the exponential smooth transition autoregressive models," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 84(C).
    2. Villanthenkodath, Muhammed Ashiq & Mahalik, Mantu Kumar, 2021. "Does economic growth respond to electricity consumption asymmetrically in Bangladesh? The implication for environmental sustainability," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 233(C).
    3. Shahbaz, Muhammad & Hoang, Thi Hong Van & Mahalik, Mantu Kumar & Roubaud, David, 2017. "Energy consumption, financial development and economic growth in India: New evidence from a nonlinear and asymmetric analysis," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 63(C), pages 199-212.
    4. Mikhail Stolbov, 2017. "Determinants of sovereign credit risk: the case of Russia," Post-Communist Economies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 29(1), pages 51-70, January.
    5. Nasreen, Samia & Anwar, Sofia & Ozturk, Ilhan, 2017. "Financial stability, energy consumption and environmental quality: Evidence from South Asian economies," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 67(C), pages 1105-1122.
    6. Xu, Haifeng & Hamori, Shigeyuki, 2012. "Dynamic linkages of stock prices between the BRICs and the United States: Effects of the 2008–09 financial crisis," Journal of Asian Economics, Elsevier, vol. 23(4), pages 344-352.
    7. Titus O. Awokuse, 2003. "Is the export-led growth hypothesis valid for Canada?," Canadian Journal of Economics, Canadian Economics Association, vol. 36(1), pages 126-136, February.
    8. Zheng, Li & Abbasi, Kashif Raza & Salem, Sultan & Irfan, Muhammad & Alvarado, Rafael & Lv, Kangjuan, 2022. "How technological innovation and institutional quality affect sectoral energy consumption in Pakistan? Fresh policy insights from novel econometric approach," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 183(C).
    9. Bilgehan TEKIN & Erol YENER, 2019. "The causality between economic growth and stock market in developing and developed countries: Toda-Yamamoto approach," Theoretical and Applied Economics, Asociatia Generala a Economistilor din Romania / Editura Economica, vol. 0(2(619), S), pages 79-90, Summer.
    10. Ayad Hicham, 2017. "Financial Development and Poverty Reduction Nexus: A Co-Integration and Causality Analysis in Selected Arabic Countries," Academic Journal of Economic Studies, Faculty of Finance, Banking and Accountancy Bucharest,"Dimitrie Cantemir" Christian University Bucharest, vol. 3(2), pages 28-35, June.
    11. Ibrahim Ari & Muammer Koc, 2018. "Sustainable Financing for Sustainable Development: Understanding the Interrelations between Public Investment and Sovereign Debt," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(11), pages 1-25, October.
    12. Lawrence U. Okoye & Alexander E. Omankhanlen & Johnson I. Okoh & Ngozi B. Adeleye & Felix N. Ezeji & Gideon K. Ezu & Benjamin I. Ehikioya, 2021. "Analyzing the Energy Consumption and Economic Growth Nexus in Nigeria," International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, Econjournals, vol. 11(1), pages 378-387.
    13. Soumen Rej & Barnali Nag & Md. Emran Hossain, 2024. "Foreign Direct Investment, Income Inequality and Pollution Reduction: Policy Trilemma for India," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 174(1), pages 221-248, August.
    14. Hayashi, Masayoshi, 2014. "Forecasting welfare caseloads: The case of the Japanese public assistance program," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 48(2), pages 105-114.
    15. Nikeel Kumar & Ronald Ravinesh Kumar & Radika Kumar & Peter Josef Stauvermann, 2020. "Is the tourism–growth relationship asymmetric in the Cook Islands? Evidence from NARDL cointegration and causality tests," Tourism Economics, , vol. 26(4), pages 658-681, June.
    16. repec:eid:wpaper:4/09 is not listed on IDEAS
    17. Camgöz, Mevlüt & Topal, Mehmet Hanefi, 2022. "Identifying the asymmetric price dynamics of Islamic equities: Implications for international investors," Research in International Business and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 60(C).
    18. Liu, Yaping & Sadiq, Farah & Ali, Wajahat & Kumail, Tafazal, 2022. "Does tourism development, energy consumption, trade openness and economic growth matters for ecological footprint: Testing the Environmental Kuznets Curve and pollution haven hypothesis for Pakistan," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 245(C).
    19. Zeynel Abidin Ozdemir, 2010. "Dynamics Of Inflation, Output Growth And Their Uncertainty In The Uk: An Empirical Analysis," Manchester School, University of Manchester, vol. 78(6), pages 511-537, December.
    20. Keen Meng Choy & Hwee Kwan Chow, 2004. "Forecasting the Global Electronics Cycle with Leading Indicators: A VAR Approach," Econometric Society 2004 Australasian Meetings 223, Econometric Society.
    21. Kabeer Bora, 2023. "The Drain Gain: An investigation into how colonial drain helped keep British economy buoyant," Working Paper Series, Department of Economics, University of Utah 2023_01, University of Utah, Department of Economics.

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:zbw:ifwkpb:71. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/iwkiede.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.