IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/zbw/ifwkpb/338122.html

Time to spend smart

Author

Listed:
  • Schularick, Moritz
  • Binder, Johannes

Abstract

• Europe is the world's second largest defence spender after the U.S., ahead of China. Yet despite substantial financial inputs, Europe has a fraction of the military capabilities of others. So far, it has also failed to update its rearmament strategy to include new defence technologies and associated mass production of low cost autonomous systems. • At the root of European military weakness lies a blatant inefficiency: Europe fields 14 different main battle tank models to America's one, 23 howitzer variants to America's two, 16 submarine types to 4 in the U.S. The fragmentation of European defence planning and procurement along national lines, and the artisanal nature of national defence production condemns Europe to low volumes, high unit costs, limited interchangeability, and technological backwardness. • The imperative to focus on outputs, not inputs, is nowhere more consequential than in Germany, where defence spending is set to triple over the coming years. Germany should pursue a defence strategy in line with its comparative advantage - mobilizing its capital base (i.e., German industry) to allow for the rapid scaling-up of military capabilities, including the expansion of production capacities to sustain a longer conflict. At the same time, Germany must invest massively in upgrading its technological potential to pursue a technology and automation-driven defence strategy. • Taking this yardstick to the publicly available German budget numbers as well as future appropriations passed by the Bundestag leads to a sobering conclusion. Germany so far has neither invested heavily in next generation defence capabilities, nor has it used capital (its industrial base) to substantially increase defence output. Nearly all of the Bundeswehr's €100 billion Special Fund - around 95% - has been committed to traditional crewed platforms while production capacity increases have been slow and small. At the same time, the share of the defence budget allocated to R&D stagnates at around 2% - less than 1/5 of the U.S. share, limiting technological renewal. • We set out five principles for smart German spending on defence: (i) prioritise the procurement of innovation and raise R&D expenditure to at least 10% of the defence budget; (ii) focus on increased production capabilities and industrial scale through capacity contracts rather than classic procurement; (iii) expand support for Ukraine in the short-run as the cheapest and most effective way for security in Europe in the shortrun; (iv) centralise procurement and create a common European defence equipment market; (v) establish joint financing, including Eurobonds, for joint ownership of next generation defence technologies as a first step toward integrated European defence.

Suggested Citation

  • Schularick, Moritz & Binder, Johannes, 2026. "Time to spend smart," Kiel Policy Briefs 204, Kiel Institute for the World Economy.
  • Handle: RePEc:zbw:ifwkpb:338122
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/338122/1/1965287158.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Juan Antolin-Diaz & Paolo Surico, 2025. "The Long-Run Effects of Government Spending," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 115(7), pages 2376-2413, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Alessandra Cepparulo & Luisa Giuriato & Paolo Pasimeni, 2025. "Defence Spending in the European Union: Evolution and Perspectives," Comparative Economic Studies, Palgrave Macmillan;Association for Comparative Economic Studies, vol. 67(4), pages 918-948, December.
    2. Ying, Limeng & Bao, Mengqi & Yang, Jie, 2025. "Institutional trust as a catalyst: Government procurement and private firms’ risk-taking in China," Economic Analysis and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 87(C), pages 2437-2457.
    3. Haroutunian, Stephan & Nerlich, Carolin & Rodríguez-Vives, Marta & Schauhoff, Caspar, 2026. "Boosting efficiency in public investment in times of fiscal constraint," Economic Bulletin Articles, European Central Bank, vol. 2.
    4. Fabio Franceschini, 2025. "The Innovation Long-Run Risk Component," Working Papers wp1215, Dipartimento Scienze Economiche, Universita' di Bologna.
    5. Giovanna Ciaffi & Matteo Deleidi & Mariana Mazzucato, 2026. "Directed Innovation Policies and the Supermultiplier: New Evidence," FMM Working Paper 122-2026, IMK at the Hans Boeckler Foundation, Macroeconomic Policy Institute.
    6. Lukas Vogel, 2025. "Reforms and Investments – The Benefits of Join Implementation," European Economy - Economic Briefs 084, Directorate General Economic and Financial Affairs (DG ECFIN), European Commission.
    7. Lavinia Piemontese & Andrea Tulli, 2026. "Public Demand Allocation and Productivity of the Private Sector," Working Papers wp1218, Dipartimento Scienze Economiche, Universita' di Bologna.
    8. Bowen Fu & Chenghan Hou & Jan Pruser, 2025. "Assessing the Effects of Monetary Shocks on Macroeconomic Stars: A SMUC-IV Framework," Papers 2510.05802, arXiv.org, revised Dec 2025.
    9. Gazi Salah Uddin & Anh H. Le & Naoki Yago & John Beirne & Donghyun PARK, 2026. "Global Fragmentation, Fiscal Policy, and Economic Growth: A Cross-country Analysis," Working Papers wp62, South East Asian Central Banks (SEACEN) Research and Training Centre, revised Feb 2026.
    10. Clancy, Daragh & Lozej, Matija, 2026. "Spending on the frontline: The macroeconomic implications of rising defence expenditure," Research Technical Papers 03/RT/26, Central Bank of Ireland.
    11. Hie Joo Ahn & Yunjong Eo, 2025. "Hysteresis and the Role of Downward Nominal Wage Rigidity: Evidence from U.S. States," Finance and Economics Discussion Series 2025-062r1, Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System (U.S.), revised 16 Dec 2025.
    12. De Graeve, Ferre & Westermark, Andreas, 2025. "Long-lag VARs," Journal of Monetary Economics, Elsevier, vol. 156(C).
    13. Alexandr Burilkov & Katelyn Bushnell & Juan Majino-Lopez & Thomas Morgan & Guntram Wolff, 2025. "Bruegel-Kiel Report - Fit for War by 2030? European Rearmament Efforts vis-à-vis Russia," Working Papers ECARES 2025-10, ULB -- Universite Libre de Bruxelles.
    14. Damiano Di Francesco & Omar Pietro Carnevale, 2025. "Are Hysteresis Effects Nonlinear?," LEM Papers Series 2025/32, Laboratory of Economics and Management (LEM), Sant'Anna School of Advanced Studies, Pisa, Italy.
    15. McClung, Nigel, 2025. "Why should fiscal imbalances concern policymakers at independent inflation-targeting central banks?," BoF Economics Review 4/2025, Bank of Finland.
    16. Burilkov, Alex & Bushnell, Katelyn & Mejino-López, Juan & Morgan, Thomas & Wolff, Guntram B., 2025. "Fit for war by 2030? European rearmament efforts vis-à-vis Russia," Kiel Reports 3, Kiel Institute for the World Economy.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    JEL classification:

    • H56 - Public Economics - - National Government Expenditures and Related Policies - - - National Security and War
    • H57 - Public Economics - - National Government Expenditures and Related Policies - - - Procurement
    • H41 - Public Economics - - Publicly Provided Goods - - - Public Goods
    • O38 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Innovation; Research and Development; Technological Change; Intellectual Property Rights - - - Government Policy
    • F5 - International Economics - - International Relations, National Security, and International Political Economy

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:zbw:ifwkpb:338122. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/iwkiede.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.