IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/zbw/iatgra/199809.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

East European integration and new division of labour in Europe: Workshop documentation

Author

Listed:
  • Potratz, Wolfgang (Ed.)
  • Widmaier, Brigitta (Ed.)

Abstract

The contributions in this volume are the result of the workshop "East European Integration and New Division of Labour in Europe" held on April 10/11, 1997 in the Institute for Work and Technology, Gelsenkirchen. The workshop aimed at a critical discussion of the institutional framework and political strategies for the integration of Central and Eastern European (CEE) countries, and at the assessment of some of developments under way since the beginning of this decade. With view to a larger integrated Europe, we started out with two main theses: 1. Fast integration of ten or more new members of a larger Europe requires a quite substantial change in institutional preconditions, in particular of the European Union, but also from the side of NATO. 2. Apart from the formal adaptation of CEE countries to the "acquis communautaire" and other requirements of the EU, economic processes like trade relations and foreign direct investment have already incorporated CEE countries in a new division of labour. With the selection of our topics and the invitation of contributions to this workshop, we tried to shed light on these problems. We now present the results which of course, can only be spotlights on a very complex situation. European summits of recent years have proposed the enlargement of the European Union through the accession of some of the associated Central and Eastern European countries. Ten countries in this region have submitted applications for membership to the European Union. Although the time range and conditions are not specified yet, the Commission has undertaken steps to assist these countries in their endeavours to join the Union. It has been clear from the beginning, however, that the accession would raise problems and challenges to both sides, and consequently each strategy will have repercussions on all actors concerned. Without a longterm conception about the goals and means for the integration of these countries mutual expectations might be difficult to be satisfied. We have been looking at such questions not only in connection with the European Union, but also with future integration of the CEE countries into NATO because, from the beginning, political and economic stability as well as military security have been the essentials of the European Communities and also today, NATO has vital interests in political and economic support for the transformation process.

Suggested Citation

  • Potratz, Wolfgang (Ed.) & Widmaier, Brigitta (Ed.), 1998. "East European integration and new division of labour in Europe: Workshop documentation," Graue Reihe des Instituts Arbeit und Technik 1998-09, Institut Arbeit und Technik (IAT), Westfälische Hochschule, University of Applied Sciences.
  • Handle: RePEc:zbw:iatgra:199809
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/99075/1/788047477.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Lansbury, Melanie & Pain, Nigel & Smidkova, Katerina, 1996. "Foreign Direct Investment in Central Europe Since 1990: An Econometric Study," National Institute Economic Review, National Institute of Economic and Social Research, vol. 156, pages 104-114, May.
    2. Govert Derks & Axel J. Halbach, 1996. "Direktinvestitionen weltweit auf Rekordhöhe : sind Arbeitsplätze in Deutschland bedroht, gewinnt die Dritte Welt?," ifo Schnelldienst, ifo Institute - Leibniz Institute for Economic Research at the University of Munich, vol. 49(30), pages 24-31, October.
    3. Piazolo, Daniel, 1996. "Trade integration between Eastern and Western Europe: Politics follows the market," Kiel Working Papers 745, Kiel Institute for the World Economy (IfW Kiel).
    4. Robert Holzmann & Christian Thimann & Angela Petz, 1994. "Pressure to Adjust: Consequences for the OECD Countries from Reforms in Eastern Europe," International Trade 9403001, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    5. D. Mario Nuti, 1996. "European Community response to the transition: aid, trade access, enlargement1," The Economics of Transition, The European Bank for Reconstruction and Development, vol. 4(2), pages 503-511, October.
    6. repec:sae:niesru:v:156:y::i:1:p:104-114 is not listed on IDEAS
    7. Hans‐Peter Lankes & A. J. Venables, 1996. "Foreign direct investment in economic transition: the changing pattern of investments," The Economics of Transition, The European Bank for Reconstruction and Development, vol. 4(2), pages 331-347, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Simona Iammarino & Christos Pitelis, 2000. "Foreign Direct Investment and 'Less Favoured Regions': Greek FDI in Bulgaria and Romania," Global Business Review, International Management Institute, vol. 1(2), pages 155-171, August.
    2. Chidlow, Agnieszka & Holmström-Lind, Christine & Holm, Ulf & Tallman, Steve, 2015. "Do I stay or do I go? Sub-national drivers for post-entry subsidiary development," International Business Review, Elsevier, vol. 24(2), pages 266-275.
    3. Bitzenis, Aristidis & Tsitouras, Antonis & Vlachos, Vasileios A., 2009. "Decisive FDI obstacles as an explanatory reason for limited FDI inflows in an EMU member state: The case of Greece," Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics (formerly The Journal of Socio-Economics), Elsevier, vol. 38(4), pages 691-704, August.
    4. Masahiro Tokunaga & Ichiro Iwasaki, 2017. "The Determinants of Foreign Direct Investment in Transition Economies: A Meta-analysis," The World Economy, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 40(12), pages 2771-2831, December.
    5. Kimberly A. Clausing & Cosmina L. Dorobantu, 2005. "Re‐entering Europe: Does European Union candidacy boost foreign direct investment?," The Economics of Transition, The European Bank for Reconstruction and Development, vol. 13(1), pages 77-103, January.
    6. Agnieszka Chidlow & Stephen Young, 2008. "Regional Determinants of FDI Distribution in Poland," William Davidson Institute Working Papers Series wp943, William Davidson Institute at the University of Michigan.
    7. Bevan, Alan & Estrin, Saul & Meyer, Klaus, 2004. "Foreign investment location and institutional development in transition economies," International Business Review, Elsevier, vol. 13(1), pages 43-64, February.
    8. Jun, Jong-Kun & Hyun, Jae Hoon, 2014. "Anticipation or risk aversion? The effects of the EU enlargement on Korean trade and FDI activities in Central and Eastern Europe," Journal of East European Management Studies, Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft mbH & Co. KG, vol. 19(4), pages 486-503.
    9. Aurora Galego & Isabel Vieira & Carlos Vieira, 2003. "The CEECs as FDI attractors: are they a menace to the EU periphery?," Economics Working Papers 4_2003, University of Évora, Department of Economics (Portugal).
    10. Iwasaki, Ichiro & 岩﨑, 一郎 & Tokunaga, Masahiro, 2019. "The Determinants and Macroeconomic Impacts of Foreign Direct Investment in Transition Economies," CEI Working Paper Series 2019-8, Center for Economic Institutions, Institute of Economic Research, Hitotsubashi University.
    11. Bellak, Christian & Leibrecht, Markus & Riedl, Aleksandra, 2008. "Labour costs and FDI flows into Central and Eastern European Countries: A survey of the literature and empirical evidence," Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, Elsevier, vol. 19(1), pages 17-37, March.
    12. Tokunaga, Masahiro & Iwasaki, Ichiro, 2014. "Transition and FDI: A Meta-Analysis of the FDI Determinants in Transition Economies," RRC Working Paper Series 47, Russian Research Center, Institute of Economic Research, Hitotsubashi University.
    13. Smarzynska Javorcik, Beata, 2004. "The composition of foreign direct investment and protection of intellectual property rights: Evidence from transition economies," European Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 48(1), pages 39-62, February.
    14. Robert Holzmann & Yves Hervé & Roland Demmel, 1996. "The maastricht fiscal criteria: Required but ineffective?," Empirica, Springer;Austrian Institute for Economic Research;Austrian Economic Association, vol. 23(1), pages 25-58, February.
    15. Schien Ninan & Jonas F. Puck, 2010. "The internationalization of Austrian firms in Central and Eastern Europe," Journal of East European Management Studies, Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft mbH & Co. KG, vol. 15(3), pages 237-259.
    16. Sadowski, Bert M., 2001. "Towards market repositioning in Central and Eastern Europe: international cooperative ventures in Hungary, Poland and the Czech Republic," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 30(5), pages 711-724, May.
    17. Carstensen, Kai & Toubal, Farid, 2004. "Foreign direct investment in Central and Eastern European countries: a dynamic panel analysis," Journal of Comparative Economics, Elsevier, vol. 32(1), pages 3-22, March.
    18. Krishna Chaitanya, & Emilia Vazquez Rozas, 2008. "Are Emerging Economies Fdi Inflows Cointegrated With Fdi Inflows Of China? ??? An Empirical Investigation," William Davidson Institute Working Papers Series wp904, William Davidson Institute at the University of Michigan.
    19. Nauro F. Campos & Yuko Kinoshita, 2002. "Foreign Direct Investment as Technology Transferred: Some Panel Evidence from the Transition Economies," Manchester School, University of Manchester, vol. 70(3), pages 398-419, June.
    20. Arratibel, Olga & Furceri, Davide & Martin, Reiner & Zdzienicka, Aleksandra, 2011. "The effect of nominal exchange rate volatility on real macroeconomic performance in the CEE countries," Economic Systems, Elsevier, vol. 35(2), pages 261-277, June.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:zbw:iatgra:199809. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/iatgede.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.