IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/zbw/iamodp/123.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Förderung der Entwicklung des ländlichen Raumes in Polen und Bayern
[Support programmes for rural development in Poland and Bavaria]

Author

Listed:
  • Sroka, Wojciech
  • Happe, Kathrin

Abstract

In diesem Arbeitspapier werden das polnische Programm für die Entwicklung ländlicher Räume (PROW) und sein deutsches Gegenstück Bayerisches Zukunftsprogramm Agrarwirtschaft und Ländliche Räume (BayZAL) analysiert. Das Hauptziel der Bearbeitung ist der Vergleich der Ziele und Instrumente für die Förderung der Landwirtschaft und ländlichen Räume. Im Mittelpunkt stehen dabei die Schwerpunkte und die wichtigsten Maßnahmen der Programme. Die Analyse ergab, dass die untersuchten Programme Unterschiede in der Finanzierung aufweisen. Diese offenbaren sich sowohl in den Schwerpunkten als auch in der Förderung für bestimmte Maßnahmen. In beiden Programmen herrschen unterschiedliche Philosophien bezüglich der Finanzierung konkreter Maßnahmen und Schwerpunkte. Sie folgen aus den Differenzen in der wirtschaftlichen Entwicklung und der Qualität des örtlichen Humankapitals. Beide Programme sind trotz ihrer Bezeichnungen nicht nur auf die ländliche Entwicklung ausgerichtet, sondern auch auf die Förderung der örtlichen Landwirtschaft. Trotz der postulierten Änderungen im neuen Paradigma zur Förderung ländlicher Räume weisen die hier analysierten Programme weiterhin eine Schwerpunktsetzung im Bereich des Sektors der Landwirtschaft auf.

Suggested Citation

  • Sroka, Wojciech & Happe, Kathrin, 2009. "Förderung der Entwicklung des ländlichen Raumes in Polen und Bayern [Support programmes for rural development in Poland and Bavaria]," IAMO Discussion Papers 123, Leibniz Institute of Agricultural Development in Transition Economies (IAMO).
    • Handle: RePEc:zbw:iamodp:123
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/32798/1/60625613X.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Happe, Kathrin & Damgaard, Martin & Osuch, Amanda & Sattler, Claudia & Zander, Peter & Uthes, Sandra & Schuler, Johannes & Piorr, Annette, 2006. "CAP-reform and the provision of non-commodity outputs in Brandenburg," German Journal of Agricultural Economics, Humboldt-Universitaet zu Berlin, Department for Agricultural Economics, vol. 55(05-06), pages 1-12.
    2. Gramzow, Andreas, 2007. "Oddolne Inicjatywy Jako Szansa Poprawy Jakości Życia Na Wsi? Wyniki Studium Przypadku W Bałtowie (Południowo-Wschodnia Polska)," IAMO Discussion Papers 90860, Institute of Agricultural Development in Transition Economies (IAMO).
    3. Gramzow, Andreas, 2007. "Od­dol­ne Inicja­ty­wy Ja­ko Sz­an­sa Po­pra­wy, Ja­ko­sci Życia na WSI? Wy­ni­ki Stu­di­um Przy­pad­ku w Bal­to­wie (Po­lud­nio­wo-​Wschod­nia Pols­ka) [Tourismus als eine Möglichkeit zur Erhöhung," IAMO Discussion Papers 103, Leibniz Institute of Agricultural Development in Transition Economies (IAMO).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. repec:zbw:iamodp:91904 is not listed on IDEAS
    2. Sroka, Wojciech & Happe, Kathrin, 2009. "Förderung Der Entwicklung Des Ländlichen Raumes In Polen Und Bayern," IAMO Discussion Papers 91904, Institute of Agricultural Development in Transition Economies (IAMO).
    3. COCHARD François & ROZAN Anne & SPAETER Sandrine, 2006. "Prevention and Compensation of Muddy Flows: Some Economic Insights," LERNA Working Papers 06.24.217, LERNA, University of Toulouse.
    4. Uthes, Sandra & Sattler, Claudia & Zander, Peter & Piorr, Annette & Matzdorf, Bettina & Damgaard, Martin & Sahrbacher, Amanda & Schuler, Johannes & Kjeldsen, Chris & Heinrich, Uwe & Fischer, Holger, 2010. "Modeling a farm population to estimate on-farm compliance costs and environmental effects of a grassland extensification scheme at the regional scale," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 103(5), pages 282-293, June.
    5. Happe, Kathrin & Kellermann, Konrad, 2007. "DIESE MODELLE SIND ZU KOMPLEX!-ODER DOCH NICHT?: EXPERIMENTELLES DESIGN UND METAMODELLIERUNG ALS MOGLICHER WEG, DAS KOMMUNIKATIONSPROBLEM AGENTENBASIERTER MODELLE IN DER POLITIKANALYSE ZU LOSEN (Germa," 47th Annual Conference, Weihenstephan, Germany, September 26-28, 2007 7613, German Association of Agricultural Economists (GEWISOLA).
    6. Uthes, Sandra & Fricke, Katharina & König, Hannes & Zander, Peter & van Ittersum, Martin & Sieber, Stefan & Helming, Katharina & Piorr, Annette & Müller, Klaus, 2010. "Policy relevance of three integrated assessment tools—A comparison with specific reference to agricultural policies," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 221(18), pages 2136-2152.
    7. Wandel, Jürgen, 2009. "Agroholdings and clusters in Kazakhstan's agro-food sector [Agroholdings und Clusters in Kasachstan’s Agrar- und Ernährungssektor]," IAMO Discussion Papers 126, Leibniz Institute of Agricultural Development in Transition Economies (IAMO).
    8. repec:zbw:iamodp:91766 is not listed on IDEAS
    9. A J Higgins & C J Miller & A A Archer & T Ton & C S Fletcher & R R J McAllister, 2010. "Challenges of operations research practice in agricultural value chains," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 61(6), pages 964-973, June.
    10. Schnicke, Hauke Joachim & Happe, Kathrin & Sahrbacher, Christoph, 2007. "Structural Change And Farm Labour Adjustments In A Dualistic Farm Structure: A Simulation Study For The Region Nitra In Southwest Slovakia," IAMO Discussion Papers 91736, Institute of Agricultural Development in Transition Economies (IAMO).
    11. repec:zbw:iamodp:91736 is not listed on IDEAS

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Entwicklung ländlicher Räume; vergleichende Analyse; Polen; Bayern; Rural development; comparative analysis; Poland; Bavaria;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • Q12 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Agriculture - - - Micro Analysis of Farm Firms, Farm Households, and Farm Input Markets
    • Q18 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Agriculture - - - Agricultural Policy; Food Policy; Animal Welfare Policy

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:zbw:iamodp:123. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/iamoode.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.