IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/zbw/i4rdps/213.html

A Comment on "A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Transdiagnostic Cognitive Behavioural Therapies for Emotional Disorders"

Author

Listed:
  • Bartoš, František
  • Godmann, Henrik R.

Abstract

Schaeuffele et al. (2024) examined the effect of Transdiagnostic Cognitive Behavioural Psychotherapy (TD-CBT) on emotional disorders through a meta-analysis of 53 studies involving 6,705 participants. Their main findings indicated that TD-CBT has larger treatment effects on depression, g = 0.74, 95% CI (0.57, 0.92), p ﹤ 0.001, and anxiety, g = 0.77, 95% CI (0.56, 0.97), p ﹤ 0.001, than controls. We replicated the data extraction of summary information from a subsample of the original studies with only minor deviations and we successfully computationally reproduced the main claims of the paper using the original data. However, robustness analyses adjusting for publication bias led to substantially different conclusions. In contrast to the original authors, we found weak evidence for the absence of the overall treatment effect of TD-CBT on both depression and anxiety in most of the specified models. Although additional sensitivity analyses could not completely rule out that the observed differences are partially results of small-study effects, further examination of between-study heterogeneity did not reveal consistent evidence of the benefit of TD-CBT when compared to any of the comparisons groups.

Suggested Citation

  • Bartoš, František & Godmann, Henrik R., 2025. "A Comment on "A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Transdiagnostic Cognitive Behavioural Therapies for Emotional Disorders"," I4R Discussion Paper Series 213, The Institute for Replication (I4R).
    • Handle: RePEc:zbw:i4rdps:213
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/313186/1/I4R-DP213.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Amanda Kvarven & Eirik Strømland & Magnus Johannesson, 2020. "Author Correction: Comparing meta-analyses and preregistered multiple-laboratory replication projects," Nature Human Behaviour, Nature, vol. 4(6), pages 659-663, June.
    2. Jack Vevea & Larry Hedges, 1995. "A general linear model for estimating effect size in the presence of publication bias," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 60(3), pages 419-435, September.
    3. Abel Brodeur & Anna Dreber & Fernando Hoces de la Guardia & Edward Miguel, 2024. "Reproduction and replication at scale," Nature Human Behaviour, Nature, vol. 8(1), pages 2-3, January.
    4. Sanghyun Hong & W. Robert Reed, 2020. "Using Monte Carlo Experiments to Select Meta-Analytic Estimators," Working Papers in Economics 20/10, University of Canterbury, Department of Economics and Finance.
    5. Carmen Schaeuffele & Laura E. Meine & Ava Schulz & Maxi C. Weber & Angela Moser & Christina Paersch & Dominique Recher & Johanna Boettcher & Babette Renneberg & Christoph Flückiger & Birgit Kleim, 2024. "A systematic review and meta-analysis of transdiagnostic cognitive behavioural therapies for emotional disorders," Nature Human Behaviour, Nature, vol. 8(3), pages 493-509, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Zuzana Irsova & Hristos Doucouliagos & Tomas Havranek & T. D. Stanley, 2024. "Meta‐analysis of social science research: A practitioner's guide," Journal of Economic Surveys, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 38(5), pages 1547-1566, December.
    2. Hong, Sanghyun & Robert Reed, W. & Tian, Bifei & Wu, Tingting & Chen, Gen, 2021. "Does FDI promote entrepreneurial activities? A meta-analysis," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 142(C).
    3. Zuzana Irsova & Pedro R. D. Bom & Tomas Havranek & Heiko Rachinger, 2025. "Spurious precision in meta-analysis of observational research," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 16(1), pages 1-12, December.
    4. Irsova, Zuzana & Bom, Pedro Ricardo Duarte & Havranek, Tomas & Rachinger, Heiko, 2023. "Spurious Precision in Meta-Analysis," MetaArXiv 3qp2w, Center for Open Science.
    5. Deer, Lachlan & Adler, Susanne J. & Datta, Hannes & Mizik, Natalie & Sarstedt, Marko, 2025. "Toward open science in marketing research," International Journal of Research in Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 42(1), pages 212-233.
    6. Molo, Fabio & Pawel, Samuel & Fraga González, Gorka, 2024. "A Robustness Reproduction of "A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of 90 Cohort Studies of Social Isolation, Loneliness and Mortality"," I4R Discussion Paper Series 169, The Institute for Replication (I4R).
    7. Hardaker, Adam & Asanov, Igor & Bartoš, František & Bruns, Stephan B., 2025. "No evidence for effectiveness of behavioral interventions to mitigate climate change after adjusting for publication bias," I4R Discussion Paper Series 263, The Institute for Replication (I4R).
    8. Jonas Moss & Riccardo De Bin, 2023. "Modelling publication bias and p‐hacking," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 79(1), pages 319-331, March.
    9. Chris Doucouliagos & Jakob de Haan & Jan-Egbert Sturm, 2022. "What drives financial development? A Meta-regression analysis [A new database of financial reforms]," Oxford Economic Papers, Oxford University Press, vol. 74(3), pages 840-868.
    10. Nazila Alinaghi & W. Robert Reed, 2021. "Taxes and Economic Growth in OECD Countries: A Meta-analysis," Public Finance Review, , vol. 49(1), pages 3-40, January.
    11. Mišák, Vojtěch, 2024. "Does heat cause homicides? A meta-analysis," International Review of Law and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 78(C).
    12. Pritchett, Lant & Filmer, Deon, 1999. "What education production functions really show: a positive theory of education expenditures," Economics of Education Review, Elsevier, vol. 18(2), pages 223-239, April.
    13. Xiaofeng Xu & Miaomiao Li & Ho Kwong Kwan & Xiaomeng Zhang, 2024. "The antecedents of moral identity: A meta-analytic review," Asia Pacific Journal of Management, Springer, vol. 41(3), pages 1697-1728, September.
    14. repec:osf:metaar:3qp2w_v1 is not listed on IDEAS
    15. Abel Brodeur & Nikolai M. Cook & Jonathan S. Hartley & Anthony Heyes, 2024. "Do Preregistration and Preanalysis Plans Reduce p-Hacking and Publication Bias? Evidence from 15,992 Test Statistics and Suggestions for Improvement," Journal of Political Economy Microeconomics, University of Chicago Press, vol. 2(3), pages 527-561.
    16. Miaomiao Li & Xiaofeng Xu & Ho Kwong Kwan, 2023. "The antecedents and consequences of workplace envy: A meta-analytic review," Asia Pacific Journal of Management, Springer, vol. 40(1), pages 1-35, March.
    17. Maya B. Mathur & Tyler J. VanderWeele, 2020. "Sensitivity analysis for publication bias in meta‐analyses," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series C, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 69(5), pages 1091-1119, November.
    18. Cort W. Rudolph & Jack C. Friedrich & Ryszard J. Koziel & Hannes Zacher, 2025. "Character Strengths Use at Work: a Meta-Analysis of Relations with Work Performance and Employee Wellbeing," Applied Research in Quality of Life, Springer;International Society for Quality-of-Life Studies, vol. 20(2), pages 753-788, April.
    19. Sanghyun Hong & W. Robert Reed, 2020. "Using Monte Carlo Experiments to Select Meta-Analytic Estimators," Working Papers in Economics 20/10, University of Canterbury, Department of Economics and Finance.
    20. Fossen, Frank M. & Neyse, Levent & Johannesson, Magnus & Dreber, Anna, 2022. "2D:4D and Self-Employment: A Preregistered Replication Study in a Large General Population Sample," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 46(1), pages 21-43.
    21. Tseday Jemaneh Mekasha & Finn Tarp, 2013. "Aid and Growth: What Meta-Analysis Reveals," Journal of Development Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 49(4), pages 564-583, April.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:zbw:i4rdps:213. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.i4replication.org/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.