IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/zbw/glodps/558.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

The Role of Institutional Trust in Medical Care Seeking during the COVID-19 Pandemic

Author

Listed:
  • Wong, Li Ping
  • Wu, Qunhong
  • Hao, Yanhua
  • Chen, Xi
  • Chen, Zhuo
  • Alias, Haridah
  • Shen, Mingwang
  • Hu, Jingcen
  • Duan, Shiwei
  • Zhang, Jinjie
  • Han, Liyuan

Abstract

This paper investigates the associations between institution trust and public response to the COVID-19 outbreak. An Internet-based, cross-sectional survey was administered on January 29, 2020 to the epicenter Hubei province, China. A total of 4,393 adults who ≥18 years of age and residing or working in the province of Hubei were included in the study. The majority of the participants expressed a higher level of trust in the information and preventive instructions provided by the central government than by the local government. Being under quarantine (adjusted odds ratio (OR) = 2.35, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.80–3.08) and having a high institutional trust score (OR = 2.23, 95% CI 1.96–2.53) were both strong and significant determinants of higher preventive behavior scores. The majority of study participants (85.7%, n = 3,640) reported that they would seek hospital treatment if they suspected themselves to have been infected with COVID-19. Few of the participants from Wuhan (16.6%, n = 475) and those participants who were under quarantine (13.8%, n = 550) expressed an unwillingness to seek hospital treatment. Institutional trust is an important factor influencing adequate preventive behavior and seeking formal medical care during an outbreak.

Suggested Citation

  • Wong, Li Ping & Wu, Qunhong & Hao, Yanhua & Chen, Xi & Chen, Zhuo & Alias, Haridah & Shen, Mingwang & Hu, Jingcen & Duan, Shiwei & Zhang, Jinjie & Han, Liyuan, 2020. "The Role of Institutional Trust in Medical Care Seeking during the COVID-19 Pandemic," GLO Discussion Paper Series 558, Global Labor Organization (GLO).
    • Handle: RePEc:zbw:glodps:558
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/217496/1/GLO-DP-0558.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Vaughan, E. & Tinker, T., 2009. "Effective health risk communication about pandemic influenza for vulnerable populations," American Journal of Public Health, American Public Health Association, vol. 99(S2), pages 324-332.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Chen, Xi & Fan, Annie, 2021. "Pandemic Economics and the Transformation of Health Policy," IZA Discussion Papers 14061, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
    2. Xi Chen & Annie Fan, 2021. "The COVID-19 pandemic and the transformation of health policy: a syndemic perspective," Journal of Chinese Economic and Business Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 19(3), pages 239-255, July.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Wei Zhong, 2017. "Simulating influenza pandemic dynamics with public risk communication and individual responsive behavior," Computational and Mathematical Organization Theory, Springer, vol. 23(4), pages 475-495, December.
    2. Seow Ting Lee & Hun Shik Kim, 2021. "Nation branding in the COVID-19 era: South Korea’s pandemic public diplomacy," Place Branding and Public Diplomacy, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 17(4), pages 382-396, December.
    3. Melissa MacKay & Andrea Cimino & Samira Yousefinaghani & Jennifer E. McWhirter & Rozita Dara & Andrew Papadopoulos, 2022. "Canadian COVID-19 Crisis Communication on Twitter: Mixed Methods Research Examining Tweets from Government, Politicians, and Public Health for Crisis Communication Guiding Principles and Tweet Engagem," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(11), pages 1-12, June.
    4. Abdulrahman Obaid AI-Youbi & Abdulmonem Al-Hayani & Hisham J. Bardesi & Mohammed Basheri & Miltiadis D. Lytras & Naif Radi Aljohani, 2020. "The King Abdulaziz University (KAU) Pandemic Framework: A Methodological Approach to Leverage Social Media for the Sustainable Management of Higher Education in Crisis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(11), pages 1-21, May.
    5. Chiara Acquati & Tzuan A. Chen & Isabel Martinez Leal & Shahnjayla K. Connors & Arooba A. Haq & Anastasia Rogova & Stephanie Ramirez & Lorraine R. Reitzel & Lorna H. McNeill, 2021. "The Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Cancer Care and Health-Related Quality of Life of Non-Hispanic Black/African American, Hispanic/Latina and Non-Hispanic White Women Diagnosed with Breast Cancer ," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(24), pages 1-16, December.
    6. Janssen, Aljoscha & Shapiro, Matthew H., 2021. "Does precise case disclosure limit precautionary behavior? Evidence from COVID-19 in Singapore," Economic Analysis and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 72(C), pages 700-714.
    7. Peter D. Lunn & Cameron A. Belton & Ciarán Lavin & Féidhlim P. McGowan & Shane Timmons & Deirdre A. Robertson, 2020. "Using behavioral science to help fight the Coronavirus," Journal of Behavioral Public Administration, Center for Experimental and Behavioral Public Administration, vol. 3(1).
    8. Kalgotra, Pankush & Gupta, Ashish & Sharda, Ramesh, 2021. "Pandemic information support lifecycle: Evidence from the evolution of mobile apps during COVID-19," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 134(C), pages 540-559.
    9. Hye‐Jin Paek & Thomas Hove, 2019. "Mediating and Moderating Roles of Trust in Government in Effective Risk Rumor Management: A Test Case of Radiation‐Contaminated Seafood in South Korea," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 39(12), pages 2653-2667, December.
    10. Meng, Qingmin, 2022. "A new simple method to test and map environmental inequality: Urban hazards disproportionately affect minorities," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 122(C).
    11. Xiaojun Zhang & Fanfan Wang & Changwen Zhu & Zhiqiang Wang, 2019. "Willingness to Self-Isolate When Facing a Pandemic Risk: Model, Empirical Test, and Policy Recommendations," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(1), pages 1-15, December.
    12. Yu Lei & Guirong Zhang & Xiuping Liao & Wei Feng, 2023. "Information Delayering Safety Management (IDSM): A New Method of System Safety in Urgent Situations Needs to Be Established," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(4), pages 1-18, February.
    13. Zerfass, Ansgar & Linke, Anne, 2012. "Social Media in der Unternehmenskommunikation: Strategien, Kompetenzen, Governance," Die Unternehmung - Swiss Journal of Business Research and Practice, Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft mbH & Co. KG, vol. 66(1), pages 49-63.
    14. Wignyo Adiyoso, 2022. "Assessing Governments’ Emergency Responses to the COVID-19 Outbreak Using a Social Network Analysis (SNA)," SAGE Open, , vol. 12(2), pages 21582440211, April.
    15. Xin Ming & Menno D. T. De Jong, 2021. "Mental Well-Being of Chinese Immigrants in the Netherlands during the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Survey Investigating Personal and Societal Antecedents," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(8), pages 1-20, April.
    16. Taixiang Duan & Zhonggen Sun & Guoqing Shi, 2021. "Sustained Effects of Government Response on the COVID-19 Infection Rate in China: A Multiple Mediation Analysis," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(23), pages 1-16, November.
    17. Mounir Amdaoud & Giuseppe Arcuri & Nadine Levratto, 2021. "Are regions equal in adversity? A spatial analysis of spread and dynamics of COVID-19 in Europe," The European Journal of Health Economics, Springer;Deutsche Gesellschaft für Gesundheitsökonomie (DGGÖ), vol. 22(4), pages 629-642, June.
    18. Miguel Rodriguez-Arrastia & Manuel García-Martín & Ana Romero-López & Carmen Ropero-Padilla & Cristofer Ruiz-Gonzalez & Pablo Roman & Nuria Sanchez-Labraca, 2022. "Evolution of the Public-Health Response to COVID-19 Pandemic in Spain: A Descriptive Qualitative Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(7), pages 1-14, March.
    19. Allcott, Hunt & Boxell, Levi & Conway, Jacob & Gentzkow, Matthew & Thaler, Michael & Yang, David, 2020. "Polarization and public health: Partisan differences in social distancing during the coronavirus pandemic," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 191(C).
    20. Melissa MacKay & Taylor Colangeli & Daniel Gillis & Jennifer McWhirter & Andrew Papadopoulos, 2021. "Examining Social Media Crisis Communication during Early COVID-19 from Public Health and News Media for Quality, Content, and Corresponding Public Sentiment," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(15), pages 1-14, July.

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:zbw:glodps:558. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/glabode.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.