IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/zbw/glodps/1054.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

American Older Adults in the Time of COVID-19: Vulnerability Types, Aging Attitudes, and Emotional Responses

Author

Listed:
  • Fu, Mingqi
  • Guo, Jing
  • Chen, Xi
  • Han, Boxun
  • Ahmed, Farooq
  • Shahid, Muhammad
  • Zhang, Qilin

Abstract

The COVID-19 pandemic has posed challenges to emotional well-being of individuals. With 1582 respondents from the Health and Retirement Survey (HRS), this study investigates the heterogeneity in older adults’ vulnerability and examines the relationship between vulnerability types, aging attitudes and emotional responses. International Positive and Negative Affect Schedule Short-form (I-PANAS-SF) and Attitudes toward own aging (ATOT) were used to assess the emotional experiences and aging attitudes, and 14 types of pandemic-related deprivations evaluated individuals' vulnerability. Latent class analysis was used to explore the vulnerability types, and weighted linear regressions examined the relationship between vulnerability, aging attitudes and emotional responses. Results showed that the proportion for individuals with mild vulnerability (MV), health care use vulnerability (HV), and dual vulnerability in health care use and finances (DVs) was 67%, 22%, and 11%, respectively. Older adults aged below 65, Hispanics and non-Hispanic Blacks, and those not eligible for Medicaid were more likely to have HV or DVS. The relationship between vulnerability and positive emotions was insignificant, yet individuals with HV (beta=0.10, SE=0.16) or DVs (beta=0.09, SE=0.28) were likely to have more negative emotions than their mildly vulnerable counterparts. Furthermore, aging attitudes moderated the relationship between vulnerability and emotions. Encouraging positive aging attitudes might be helpful for older adults to have better emotional well-being, especially for those with DVs.

Suggested Citation

  • Fu, Mingqi & Guo, Jing & Chen, Xi & Han, Boxun & Ahmed, Farooq & Shahid, Muhammad & Zhang, Qilin, 2022. "American Older Adults in the Time of COVID-19: Vulnerability Types, Aging Attitudes, and Emotional Responses," GLO Discussion Paper Series 1054, Global Labor Organization (GLO).
    • Handle: RePEc:zbw:glodps:1054
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/250054/1/GLO-DP-1054.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Other versions of this item:

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Kalliopi Sapountzaki, 2012. "Vulnerability management by means of resilience," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 60(3), pages 1267-1285, February.
    2. Leen Vandercammen & Joeri Hofmans & Peter Theuns, 2014. "Relating Specific Emotions to Intrinsic Motivation: On the Moderating Role of Positive and Negative Emotion Differentiation," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 9(12), pages 1-22, December.
    3. Liat Ayalon & Alison Chasteen & Manfred Diehl & Becca R Levy & Shevaun D Neupert & Klaus Rothermund & Clemens Tesch-Römer & Hans-Werner Wahl, 2021. "Aging in Times of the COVID-19 Pandemic: Avoiding Ageism and Fostering Intergenerational Solidarity," The Journals of Gerontology: Series B, The Gerontological Society of America, vol. 76(2), pages 49-52.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Brink, Siegrun & Weicht, Rebecca & Levering, Britta & Icks, Annette, 2022. "Unternehmertum während der Corona-Pandemie: Individuelle Resilienz," IfM-Materialien 293, Institut für Mittelstandsforschung (IfM) Bonn.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Alison L. Chasteen & Sali A. Tagliamonte & Katharina Pabst & Samantha Brunet, 2022. "Ageist Communication Experienced by Middle-Aged and Older Canadians," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(4), pages 1-7, February.
    2. Justyna Wiktorowicz & Izabela Warwas & Dariusz Turek & Iwa Kuchciak, 2022. "Does generativity matter? A meta-analysis on individual work outcomes," European Journal of Ageing, Springer, vol. 19(4), pages 977-995, December.
    3. David Gold & Stuart Hughes & David Thomas, 2021. "Perceptions, experiences and opportunities for occupational safety and health professionals arising out of the COVID-19 Pandemic," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 8(1), pages 1-14, December.
    4. Akter, Sonia & Mallick, Bishawjit, 2013. "An empirical investigation of socio-economic resilience to natural disasters," MPRA Paper 50375, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    5. Anna Schlomann & Mareike Bünning & Lena Hipp & Hans-Werner Wahl, 2022. "Aging during COVID-19 in Germany: a longitudinal analysis of psychosocial adaptation," European Journal of Ageing, Springer, vol. 19(4), pages 1077-1086, December.
    6. Chih-Hao WANG & Na Chen, 2022. "Are people equally exposed to seismic and climate-change-induced hazards? Evidence from the San Francisco Bay Area," Environment and Planning B, , vol. 49(9), pages 2484-2499, November.
    7. Stefania Pascut & Susanna Feruglio & Cristiano Crescentini & Alessio Matiz, 2022. "Predictive Factors of Anxiety, Depression, and Health-Related Quality of Life in Community-Dwelling and Institutionalized Elderly during the COVID-19 Pandemic," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(17), pages 1-18, September.
    8. van Hoof, Joost & van Staalduinen, Willeke H. & Dikken, Jeroen, 2024. "A multi-year quantitative study of the experienced age-friendliness in The Hague: A tale of four personas," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 340(C).
    9. Marta Podhorecka & Anna Pyszora & Agnieszka Woźniewicz & Jakub Husejko & Kornelia Kędziora-Kornatowska, 2021. "Health and Protective Measures for Seniors during the COVID-19 Pandemic in the Opinion of Polish Society," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(17), pages 1-19, September.
    10. Md. Ahsan & Kuniyoshi Takeuchi, 2015. "RETRACTED ARTICLE: The dynamics among poverty, vulnerability, and resilience: evidence from coastal Bangladesh," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 79(3), pages 2123-2123, December.
    11. Akter, Sonia & Mallick, Bishawjit, 2013. "The poverty–vulnerability–resilience nexus: Evidence from Bangladesh," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 96(C), pages 114-124.
    12. Stefan Hopf & Kieran Walsh & Eilionóir Flynn & Nena Georgantzi, 2021. "The Relationship between Ageism and Well-Being as Mediated through COVID-19-Related Experiences and Discourses," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(19), pages 1-17, October.
    13. Ali Jamshed & Chirag Patel & Anshul Puriya & Nimra Iqbal & Irfan Ahmad Rana & Joanna M. McMillan & Rajiv Pandey & Shahbaz Altaf & Rana Tahir Mehmood & Umair bin Saad, 2024. "Flood resilience assessment from the perspective of urban (in)formality in Surat, India: Implications for sustainable development," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 120(10), pages 9297-9326, August.
    14. Heather Brown & Kate Reid, 2021. "Navigating Infodemics, Unlocking Social Capital and Maintaining Food Security during the COVID-19 First Wave in the UK: Older Adults’ Experiences," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(14), pages 1-12, July.
    15. Ryszard J. Koziel & Jack C. Friedrich & Cort W. Rudolph & Hannes Zacher, 2021. "Age-Differentiated Leadership and Healthy Aging at Work: Evidence from the Early Stages of the COVID-19 Pandemic," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(23), pages 1-16, November.
    16. Emilio Paolo Visintin & Alessandra Tasso, 2022. "Are You Willing to Protect the Health of Older People? Intergenerational Contact and Ageism as Predictors of Attitudes toward the COVID-19 Vaccination Passport," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(17), pages 1-13, September.
    17. Farah Mulyasari & Rajib Shaw, 2013. "Role of women as risk communicators to enhance disaster resilience of Bandung, Indonesia," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 69(3), pages 2137-2160, December.
    18. Xin Miao & David Banister & Yanhong Tang, 2013. "Embedding resilience in emergency resource management to cope with natural hazards," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 69(3), pages 1389-1404, December.
    19. Ruxandra Bejinaru, 2022. "Cluster Analysis Of Risks And Vulnerabilities For Environment Sustainable Management," Oradea Journal of Business and Economics, University of Oradea, Faculty of Economics, vol. 7(2), pages 35-48, Septembri.
    20. Antonino Callea & Dalila De Rosa & Giovanni Ferri & Francesca Lipari & Marco Costanzi, 2019. "Are More Intelligent People Happier? Emotional Intelligence as Mediator between Need for Relatedness, Happiness and Flourishing," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(4), pages 1-12, February.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Vulnerability; Aging attitudes; Emotion; Older adults; COVID-19;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • J14 - Labor and Demographic Economics - - Demographic Economics - - - Economics of the Elderly; Economics of the Handicapped; Non-Labor Market Discrimination
    • D91 - Microeconomics - - Micro-Based Behavioral Economics - - - Role and Effects of Psychological, Emotional, Social, and Cognitive Factors on Decision Making
    • I14 - Health, Education, and Welfare - - Health - - - Health and Inequality

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:zbw:glodps:1054. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/glabode.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.