IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/zbw/esrepo/201805.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Reward-based Crowdfunding – Ein prosoziales Fundraising-Instrument für die breite Masse? Eine Analyse anhand der Schweizer Kampagne «Neustartdario»
[Reward-Based Crowdfunding – A Prosocial Fundraising Tool for the Many?]

Author

Listed:
  • Früh, Sebastian

Abstract

Crowdfunding ist ein mächtiges Instrument um online Geld zu sammeln. Besonders in prosozialen Kontexten kann Crowdfunding als relevante Alternative zu Fundraising-Aktivitäten von Non-Profit-Organisationen und Stiftungen gesehen werden. Der öffentliche Zugang und die unkomplizierte Handhabung, sollten es der breiten Masse ermöglichen, die Technologie als individuelles Fundraising-Instrument einzusetzen. In dieser Analyse wird untersucht, inwiefern reward-based Crowdfunding für prosoziale Fundraising-Aktivitäten eingesetzt werden kann. Hierzu wird die Schweizer Crowdfunding-Kampagne «Neustartdario» auf verschiedene Faktoren und deren Einfluss auf den Kampagnenverlauf untersucht. Dementsprechend werden drei übergeordnete Untersuchungsfragen definiert: (1) Welche Rolle spielte das persönliche Netzwerk der Initiatorin? (2) Welche Rolle spielten die eingebrachten Ressourcen der Initiatorin, des Betroffenen und deren Umfeld? (3) Welche Rolle spielte die Berichterstattung in den Medien? Die Analyse resultiert in einer Abschätzung, inwiefern reward-based Crowdfunding von der allgemeinen Bevölkerung als prosoziales Fundraising-Instrument eingesetzt werden kann sowie in anwendbaren Empfehlungen für zukünftige Initianten von prosozialen reward-based Crowdfunding-Kampagnen.

Suggested Citation

  • Früh, Sebastian, 2019. "Reward-based Crowdfunding – Ein prosoziales Fundraising-Instrument für die breite Masse? Eine Analyse anhand der Schweizer Kampagne «Neustartdario» [Reward-Based Crowdfunding – A Prosocial Fundrais," EconStor Research Reports 201805, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics.
    • Handle: RePEc:zbw:esrepo:201805
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/201805/1/Fr%c3%bch2019_Analyse_Crowdfunding_Neustartdario_190809_final.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Michael Beier & Kerstin Wagner, 2017. "What determines the growth expectations of early-stage entrepreneurs? Evidence from crowdfunding," International Journal of Entrepreneurship and Small Business, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 31(1), pages 12-31.
    2. Massimo G. Colombo & Chiara Franzoni & Cristina Rossi–Lamastra, 2015. "Internal Social Capital and the Attraction of Early Contributions in Crowdfunding," Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, , vol. 39(1), pages 75-100, January.
    3. Mollick, Ethan, 2014. "The dynamics of crowdfunding: An exploratory study," Journal of Business Venturing, Elsevier, vol. 29(1), pages 1-16.
    4. Beier, Michael, 2018. "Digitale Strategien für Nonprofit-Organisationen Anfang des 21. Jahrhunderts," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, pages 101-118.
    5. Beier, Michael & Früh, Sebastian, 2018. "Nutzung von Social Media Plattformen durch Schweizer Spitäler - Eigene Accounts, Nutzungsintensitäten und Reichweiten," EconStor Research Reports 184655, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Douglas Cumming & Lars Hornuf & Moein Karami & Denis Schweizer, 2023. "Disentangling Crowdfunding from Fraudfunding," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 182(4), pages 1103-1128, February.
    2. Jascha-Alexander Koch & Michael Siering, 2019. "The recipe of successful crowdfunding campaigns," Electronic Markets, Springer;IIM University of St. Gallen, vol. 29(4), pages 661-679, December.
    3. Sylvain Dejean, 2020. "The role of distance and social networks in the geography of crowdfunding: evidence from France," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 54(3), pages 329-339, March.
    4. Helen Bollaert & Gaël Leboeuf & Armin Schwienbacher, 2020. "The narcissism of crowdfunding entrepreneurs," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 55(1), pages 57-76, June.
    5. Berns, John P. & Jia, Yankun & Gondo, Maria, 2022. "Crowdfunding success in sustainability-oriented projects: An exploratory examination of the crowdfunding of 3D printers," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 71(C).
    6. Tobias Regner, 2021. "Crowdfunding a monthly income: an analysis of the membership platform Patreon," Journal of Cultural Economics, Springer;The Association for Cultural Economics International, vol. 45(1), pages 133-142, March.
    7. Yuho Chung & Yiwei Li & Jianmin Jia, 2021. "Exploring embeddedness, centrality, and social influence on backer behavior: the role of backer networks in crowdfunding," Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Springer, vol. 49(5), pages 925-946, September.
    8. Ishtiaq Ahmad Bajwa & Shafiq Ur Rehman & Abid Iqbal & Zaheer Anwer & Murtaza Ashiq & Muhammad Ajmal Khan, 2022. "Past, Present and Future of FinTech Research: A Bibliometric Analysis," SAGE Open, , vol. 12(4), pages 21582440221, October.
    9. Chan, C.S. Richard & Parhankangas, Annaleena & Sahaym, Arvin & Oo, Pyayt, 2020. "Bellwether and the herd? Unpacking the u-shaped relationship between prior funding and subsequent contributions in reward-based crowdfunding," Journal of Business Venturing, Elsevier, vol. 35(2).
    10. Rob Gleasure & Kieran Conboy & Lorraine Morgan, 2019. "Talking Up a Storm: How Backers Use Public Discourse to Exert Control in Crowdfunded Systems Development Projects," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 30(2), pages 447-465, June.
    11. Jung, Eunjun & Lee, Changjun & Hwang, Junseok, 2022. "Effective strategies to attract crowdfunding investment based on the novelty of business ideas," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 178(C).
    12. Johannes Wallmeroth & Peter Wirtz & Alexander Peter Groh, 2017. "Institutional Seed Financing, Angel Financing, and Crowdfunding of Entrepreneurial Ventures: A Literature Review," Working Papers hal-01527999, HAL.
    13. Sarah Borchers & Lee M. Dunham, 2022. "Tapping of the crowd: The effect of entrepreneur engagement on equity crowdfunding success," Journal of Economics and Finance, Springer;Academy of Economics and Finance, vol. 46(2), pages 324-346, April.
    14. Thomas Clauss & Thomas Niemand & Sascha Kraus & Patrick Schnetzer & Alexander Brem, 2019. "Increasing Crowdfunding Success Through Social Media: The Importance Of Reach And Utilisation In Reward-Based Crowdfunding," International Journal of Innovation Management (ijim), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 24(03), pages 1-30, May.
    15. Maurer, Joshua D. & Creek, Steven A. & Allison, Thomas H. & Bendickson, Joshua S. & Sahaym, Arvin, 2023. "Affiliation rhetoric and digital orientation in crowdfunding appeals," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 190(C).
    16. Daniel Blaseg & Christian Schulze & Bernd Skiera, 2020. "Consumer Protection on Kickstarter," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 39(1), pages 211-233, January.
    17. Allison, Thomas H. & Davis, Blakley C. & Webb, Justin W. & Short, Jeremy C., 2017. "Persuasion in crowdfunding: An elaboration likelihood model of crowdfunding performance," Journal of Business Venturing, Elsevier, vol. 32(6), pages 707-725.
    18. Zunino, Diego & van Praag, Mirjam C. & Dushnitsky, Gary, 2017. "Badge of Honor or Scarlet Letter? Unpacking Investors' Judgment of Entrepreneurs' Past Failure," IZA Discussion Papers 11017, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
    19. Etienne Schraven & Elco van Burg & Marco van Gelderen & Enno Masurel, 2020. "Predictions of Crowdfunding Campaign Success: The Influence of First Impressions on Accuracy and Positivity," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 13(12), pages 1-16, December.
    20. Jermain Kaminski & Christian Hopp & Christian Lukas, 2018. "Who benefits from the wisdom of the crowd in crowdfunding? Assessing the benefits of user-generated and mass personal electronic word of mouth in computer-mediated financing," Journal of Business Economics, Springer, vol. 88(9), pages 1133-1162, December.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    reward-based crowdfunding; social fundraising;

    JEL classification:

    • I14 - Health, Education, and Welfare - - Health - - - Health and Inequality

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:zbw:esrepo:201805. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/zbwkide.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.