IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/zbw/ercisw/16.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

State of and perspectives for IS strategy research: A discussion paper

Author

Listed:
  • Teubner, Rolf Alexander
  • Pellengahr, Alexander Robert

Abstract

Notwithstanding the substantial overall research efforts in the field of Strategic Information Systems Planning (SISP), the 'IS strategy' as the goal and outcome of SISP has received only limited research attention to date. In addition, there is considerable evidence that the debates on IS strategy in academia and practice are largely different and independent from each other. This observation motivates us to look into the existing research on IS strategy and its relationship to practice in greater detail. Our analysis reveals that academic conceptions of IS strategy do not seem to have much in common with how IS strategy practitioners interpret the construct. Both worlds seem to have coexisted independently alongside one another for a long time. This divergence leads to a number of problematic outcomes, not least of which is a considerable lack of relevance and acceptance of academic research in practice. Based on an intensive study of IS strategy perceptions in both academia and practice, we make suggestions on how IS strategy research should be reinvented in order that it may produce more reliable as well as practically useful and relevant insights in the face of the challenges of the 21st century. We concentrate these suggestions in four major propositions: (1) Strategy over Strategizing, demanding to develop an understanding of the construct of IS strategy first before focusing on SISP as the process developing it, (2) Strategy in vivo over Strategy in vitro, demanding to develop a fresh understanding of the construct of IS strategy by conducting research in the field instead of relying on strategy interpretations that are preconfigured by a small number of prevailing strategy models and theories, (3) Empiricism over Idealism, demanding that intensive field research on IS strategy should be conducted starting with deep small-scale explorative studies aiming at new insights instead of large-scale confirmatory surveys that test pre-existing hypotheses, (4) Sustainability over Competitiveness, demanding to relinquish the academic predilection for research on competitive aspects of IT in favor of issues that are much more relevant in practice, such as efficiency, reliability, serviceability and sustainability of a company's IT-based infrastructure.

Suggested Citation

  • Teubner, Rolf Alexander & Pellengahr, Alexander Robert, 2013. "State of and perspectives for IS strategy research: A discussion paper," ERCIS Working Papers 16, University of Münster, European Research Center for Information Systems (ERCIS).
    • Handle: RePEc:zbw:ercisw:16
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/74723/1/746039239.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Martha S. Feldman & Wanda J. Orlikowski, 2011. "Theorizing Practice and Practicing Theory," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 22(5), pages 1240-1253, October.
    2. Albert H. Segars & Varun Grover, 1999. "Profiles of Strategic Information Systems Planning," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 10(3), pages 199-232, September.
    3. Teubner, Rolf Alexander & Mocker, Martin, 2005. "Strategic information planning: Insights from an action research project in the financial services industry," ERCIS Working Papers 3, University of Münster, European Research Center for Information Systems (ERCIS).
    4. Arnold Picot & Ralf Reichwald & Rolf Wigand, 2008. "Information, Organization and Management," Springer Books, Springer, number 978-3-540-71395-1, December.
    5. Teubner, Rolf Alexander & Pellengahr, Alexander & Mocker, Martin, 2012. "The IT strategy divide: Professional practice and academic debate," ERCIS Working Papers 12, University of Münster, European Research Center for Information Systems (ERCIS).
    6. Becker, Jörg (Ed.) & Backhaus, Klaus (Ed.) & Grob, Heinz Lothar (Ed.) & Hoeren, Thomas (Ed.) & Klein, Stefan (Ed.) & Kuchen, Herbert (Ed.) & Müller-Funk, Ulrich (Ed.) & Thonemann, Ulrich W. (Ed.) & Vo, 2004. "European Research Center for Information Systems (ERCIS): Gründungsveranstaltung Münster, 12. Oktober 2004," ERCIS Working Papers 1, University of Münster, European Research Center for Information Systems (ERCIS).
    7. David J. Teece & Gary Pisano & Amy Shuen, 1997. "Dynamic capabilities and strategic management," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 18(7), pages 509-533, August.
    8. Teubner, Rolf Alexander & Mocker, Martin, 2008. "A literature overview on strategic information systems planning," ERCIS Working Papers 6, University of Münster, European Research Center for Information Systems (ERCIS).
    9. King, William R. & Teo, Thompson S. H., 2000. "Assessing the impact of proactive versus reactive modes of strategic information systems planning," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 28(6), pages 667-679, December.
    10. Irwin T.J. Brown, 2004. "Testing and Extending Theory in Strategic Information Systems Planning Through Literature Analysis," Information Resources Management Journal (IRMJ), IGI Global, vol. 17(4), pages 20-48, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Rolf Teubner, 2013. "Information Systems Strategy," Business & Information Systems Engineering: The International Journal of WIRTSCHAFTSINFORMATIK, Springer;Gesellschaft für Informatik e.V. (GI), vol. 5(4), pages 243-257, August.
    2. Teubner, Rolf Alexander & Mocker, Martin, 2008. "A literature overview on strategic information systems planning," ERCIS Working Papers 6, University of Münster, European Research Center for Information Systems (ERCIS).
    3. Hassani, Abdeslam & Mosconi, Elaine, 2022. "Social media analytics, competitive intelligence, and dynamic capabilities in manufacturing SMEs," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 175(C).
    4. Vossen, Gottfried & Hagemann, Stephan, 2007. "From Version 1.0 to Version 2.0: A brief history of the web," ERCIS Working Papers 4, University of Münster, European Research Center for Information Systems (ERCIS).
    5. Kianto, Aino & Ritala, Paavo & Vanhala, Mika & Hussinki, Henri, 2020. "Reflections on the criteria for the sound measurement of intellectual capital: A knowledge-based perspective," CRITICAL PERSPECTIVES ON ACCOUNTING, Elsevier, vol. 70(C).
    6. Bocken, Nancy & Konietzko, Jan, 2022. "Circular business model innovation in consumer-facing corporations," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 185(C).
    7. Luciana D’Adderio, 2014. "The Replication Dilemma Unravelled: How Organizations Enact Multiple Goals in Routine Transfer," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 25(5), pages 1325-1350, October.
    8. Teubner, Alexander & Stockhinger, Jan, 2020. "IT/IS strategy research and digitalization: An extensive literature review," ERCIS Working Papers 34, University of Münster, European Research Center for Information Systems (ERCIS).
    9. Stockhinger, Jan & Teubner, Alexander, 2019. "How digitalization drives the IT/IS strategy agenda," ERCIS Working Papers 31, University of Münster, European Research Center for Information Systems (ERCIS).
    10. Rouslan Koumakhov & Adel Daoud, 2017. "Routine and reflexivity: Simonian cognitivism vs practice approach," Industrial and Corporate Change, Oxford University Press and the Associazione ICC, vol. 26(4), pages 727-743.
    11. Hagemann, Stephan & Letz, Carolin & Vossen, Gottfried, 2007. "Web service discovery: Reality check 2.0," ERCIS Working Papers 5, University of Münster, European Research Center for Information Systems (ERCIS).
    12. Neil M Kay, 2018. "We need to talk: opposing narratives and conflicting perspectives in the conversation on routines," Industrial and Corporate Change, Oxford University Press and the Associazione ICC, vol. 27(6), pages 943-956.
    13. Alireza Javanmardi Kashan & Kavoos Mohannak & Mirko Perano & Gian Luca Casali, 2018. "A Discovery of Multiple Levels of Open Innovation in Understanding the Economic Sustainability. A Case Study in the Manufacturing Industry," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(12), pages 1-21, December.
    14. Swen Nadkarni & Reinhard Prügl, 2021. "Digital transformation: a review, synthesis and opportunities for future research," Management Review Quarterly, Springer, vol. 71(2), pages 233-341, April.
    15. Panagiotis Trivellas & Georgios Malindretos & Panagiotis Reklitis, 2020. "Implications of Green Logistics Management on Sustainable Business and Supply Chain Performance: Evidence from a Survey in the Greek Agri-Food Sector," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(24), pages 1-29, December.
    16. Jiatong Yu & Jiajue Wang & Taesoo Moon, 2022. "Influence of Digital Transformation Capability on Operational Performance," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(13), pages 1-20, June.
    17. Chin‐jung Luan & Chengli Tien & Pei‐hua Wu, 2013. "Strategizing Environmental Policy and Compliance for Firm Economic Sustainability: Evidence from Taiwanese Electronics Firms," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 22(8), pages 517-546, December.
    18. Adrian Gourlay & Jonathan Seaton, 2004. "The determinants of firm diversification in UK quoted companies," Applied Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 36(18), pages 2059-2071.
    19. Tobias Knabke & Sebastian Olbrich, 2018. "Building novel capabilities to enable business intelligence agility: results from a quantitative study," Information Systems and e-Business Management, Springer, vol. 16(3), pages 493-546, August.
    20. Filippo Carlo Wezel & Gino Cattani & Johannes M. Pennings, 2006. "Competitive Implications of Interfirm Mobility," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 17(6), pages 691-709, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:zbw:ercisw:16. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ilmuede.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.