IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/zbw/bofrdp/rdp2002_004.html

Technology, automation and productivity of stock exchanges: International evidence

Author

Listed:
  • Hasan, Iftekhar
  • Malkamäki, Markku
  • Schmiedel, Heiko

Abstract

The paper stresses on the importance of understanding the operational choices, strategies, and performances of stock exchanges as regular operating firms (Arnold et al (1999), and Pirrong (1999)) Using unbalanced panel data on 49 stock exchanges over the period 1989 1998, the paper traces the productivity of stock exchanges over time and across different types and groups of exchanges.We find significant variability in respect of the productivity revenue and cost efficiency across these exchanges.On average, North American exchanges are found to be most cost and revenue efficient.However, our findings also indicate that European exchanges have improved the most, in respect of cost efficiency, while exchanges in South America and Asia-Pacific regions are found to be lagging as regards both cost and revenue estimations.The evidence also indicates that investment in technology-related developments effectively influenced cost and revenue efficiency.Moreover, organisational structure and market competition are found to be significantly associated with both cost and revenue efficiency for the exchanges studied, whereas market size and quality are related only to revenue efficiency.

Suggested Citation

  • Hasan, Iftekhar & Malkamäki, Markku & Schmiedel, Heiko, 2002. "Technology, automation and productivity of stock exchanges: International evidence," Bank of Finland Research Discussion Papers 4/2002, Bank of Finland.
  • Handle: RePEc:zbw:bofrdp:rdp2002_004
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/211908/1/bof-rdp2002-004.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Other versions of this item:

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. is not listed on IDEAS
    2. Li, Shaofang & Marinč, Matej, 2016. "Competition in the clearing and settlement industry," Journal of International Financial Markets, Institutions and Money, Elsevier, vol. 40(C), pages 134-162.
    3. Ben Slimane, Faten & Padilla Angulo, Laura, 2019. "Strategic change and corporate governance: Evidence from the stock exchange industry," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 103(C), pages 206-218.
    4. Lihua Zuo & Jack Strauss & Lijuan Zuo, 2021. "The Digitalization Transformation of Commercial Banks and Its Impact on Sustainable Efficiency Improvements through Investment in Science and Technology," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(19), pages 1-17, October.
    5. Iftekhar Hasan & Heiko Schmiedel & Liang Song, 2012. "How Stock Exchange Mergers and Acquisitions Affect Competitors’ Shareholder Value: Global Evidence," Chapters, in: Geoffrey Poitras (ed.), Handbook of Research on Stock Market Globalization, chapter 8, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    6. Otchere, Isaac, 2006. "Stock exchange self-listing and value effects," Journal of Corporate Finance, Elsevier, vol. 12(5), pages 926-953, December.
    7. Iftekhar Hasan & Heiko Schmiedel & Liang Song, 2012. "Growth Strategies and Value Creation: What Works Best for Stock Exchanges?," The Financial Review, Eastern Finance Association, vol. 47(3), pages 469-499, August.
    8. Iftekhar Hasan & Heiko Schmiedel & Liang Song, 2012. "Returns to Retail Banking and Payments," Journal of Financial Services Research, Springer;Western Finance Association, vol. 41(3), pages 163-195, June.
    9. Hasan, Iftekhar & Schmiedel, Heiko, 2004. "Networks and equity market integration: European evidence," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 13(5), pages 601-619.
    10. Richard Oduro & Francis Kwaw Andoh & Samuel Gameli Gadzo, 2022. "Dynamics and Drivers of Competition in the Ghanaian Banking Industry," International Journal of Global Business and Competitiveness, Springer, vol. 17(2), pages 175-191, December.
    11. Docherty, Peter & Wang, Gehong, 2010. "Using synthetic data to evaluate the impact of RTGS on systemic risk in the Australian payments system," Journal of Financial Stability, Elsevier, vol. 6(2), pages 103-117, June.
    12. Schmiedel, Heiko & Malkamaki, Markku & Tarkka, Juha, 2006. "Economies of scale and technological development in securities depository and settlement systems," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 30(6), pages 1783-1806, June.
    13. Li, Shaofang & Marinč, Matej, 2018. "Economies of scale and scope in financial market infrastructures," Journal of International Financial Markets, Institutions and Money, Elsevier, vol. 53(C), pages 17-49.
    14. Seven Ipek & Cumhur Ekinci, 2022. "Cost efficiency in financial exchanges and post-trade infrastructures: a closer look at integration and product diversification," Eurasian Economic Review, Springer;Eurasia Business and Economics Society, vol. 12(4), pages 705-743, December.
    15. Rapee PONGPANICH & Ke-Chung PENG & Kamonthip MAICHUM, 2017. "The performance measurement of listed companies of the agribusiness sector on the stock exchange of Thailand," Agricultural Economics, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 63(5), pages 234-245.
    16. Cao, Jianhong & Law, Siong Hook & Samad, Abdul Rahim Abdul & Mohamad, Wan Norhidayah W., 2023. "Internal mechanism analysis of the financial vanishing effect on green growth: Evidence from China," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 120(C).
    17. Iftekhar Hasan & Heiko Schmiedel & Liang Song, 2012. "Growth Strategies and Value Creation: What Works Best for Stock Exchanges?," The Financial Review, Eastern Finance Association, vol. 47(3), pages 469-499, August.
    18. Kobana Abukari & Isaac Otchere, 2020. "Has stock exchange demutualization improved market quality? International evidence," Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting, Springer, vol. 55(3), pages 901-934, October.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;

    JEL classification:

    • C23 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Single Equation Models; Single Variables - - - Models with Panel Data; Spatio-temporal Models
    • O50 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Economywide Country Studies - - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:zbw:bofrdp:rdp2002_004. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/bofgvfi.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.