IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/wpa/wuwpio/0504020.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Declining Share of Wages in Organised Indian Industry (1973-97): A Kaleckian Perspective

Author

Listed:
  • Rahul Shastri

    (National Akademi of Development)

  • Ramana Murthy

    (NALSAR)

Abstract

The share of wages in organised Indian industry declined considerably between 1973 and 1997. The end to end drop was 19 per cent, and the wage share fell from 51.7 per cent to 32.8 per cent. In proportionate terms, the decline in wage share was between 30-40 per cent. The period of analysis divides into two phases. In the first phase of fifteen years (1973-87), wage share declined by 5½ percentage points, while the fall accelerated after 1987, and the decline from 1987-97 was by 13½ percentage points. If it is possible to identify the period 1987-97 with the period of liberalisation, it may be inferred that 70 per cent of the decline in the wage share was during the period of liberalisation. The period of liberalisation has witnessed an acceleration in the decline of the wage share. Faster growth of low-wage-share industries was responsible for a substantial part of the decline the share of labour. More than 1/3 of the total decrease in the wage share (1973-97) was due to the faster growth of low wage-share industries. Growing importance of low wage-share industries was the sole reason for the decline in wage share between 1973-87. After 1987, the relative growth of low wage-share industries contributed only 9 per cent of the fall in the aggregate wage share. In the period as a whole, the decline in wage share at the individual industry level contributed at least half (9½ percentage points) of the total decline in the aggregate wage share. In the first period, 1973-87, the industry level wage shares actually rose. However, in the second period, the industry level shares have been falling rapidly. They fell by 12.3 percentage points against the total decline of 13.5 percentage points in the wage share in this period. Thus, the decline in industry level wage shares contributed more than 90 per cent of the total decline in wage share in the second period (1987-97). If this period may be called the period of liberalisation, it may said that wage shares fell drastically at individual industry levels during liberalisation. For the period as a whole, the decline in industry level wage share was entirely due to the rise in material/wage (m/w) ratio. Constant composition mark-up remained the same end to end between 1973- 97. This study also examines the reasons for the consistent rise in m/w ratio and finds it to be due to technical change. Almost the entire increase in the m/w ratio was due to the rise in the material used per employee. This index rose from 100 to 380 over the period. Most of the increased material used found its way into greater output. Thus, O/L (index) rose from 100 to 346 over the time period. A small fraction of the rise in the material intensity per employee went into a rise in the material output ratio, whose index rose from 100 to 110. Thus, the study reveals a drastic decline in the aggregate share of wages between 1973- 97. This decrease came about as a result of a faster growth of low wage share industries over the period, as well as a rise in the material intensity per employee in the production process. Thus changes in output mix and technical change were responsible for the 19 percentage point drop in the share of wages. Mark-ups played no role in the decline in the period as a whole.

Suggested Citation

  • Rahul Shastri & Ramana Murthy, 2005. "Declining Share of Wages in Organised Indian Industry (1973-97): A Kaleckian Perspective," Industrial Organization 0504020, University Library of Munich, Germany.
  • Handle: RePEc:wpa:wuwpio:0504020
    Note: Type of Document - pdf; pages: 16
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://econwpa.ub.uni-muenchen.de/econ-wp/io/papers/0504/0504020.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Fallon, Peter R & Lucas, Robert E B, 1991. "The Impact of Changes in Job Security Regulations in India and Zimbabwe," The World Bank Economic Review, World Bank, vol. 5(3), pages 395-413, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Amrita Chhachhi & Saumyajit Bhattacharya, 2014. "Is Labour Still a Relevant Category for Praxis? Critical Reflections on Some Contemporary Discourses on Work and Labour in Capitalism," Development and Change, International Institute of Social Studies, vol. 45(5), pages 941-962, September.
    2. Fu, Hu & Kleinberg, Robert & Lavi, Ron & Smorodinsky, Rann, 2017. "Job security, stability and production efficiency," Theoretical Economics, Econometric Society, vol. 12(1), January.
    3. Djankov, Simeon & Ramalho, Rita, 2009. "Employment laws in developing countries," Journal of Comparative Economics, Elsevier, vol. 37(1), pages 3-13, March.
    4. Maskus, Keith E., 1997. "Should core labor standards be imposed through international trade policy?," Policy Research Working Paper Series 1817, The World Bank.
    5. Kaushik Basu & Gary S. Fields & Shub Debgupta, 2009. "Labor Retrenchment Laws And Their Effect On Wages And Employment: A Theoretical Investigation," World Scientific Book Chapters, in: Bhaskar Dutta & Tridip Ray & E Somanathan (ed.), New And Enduring Themes In Development Economics, chapter 9, pages 181-205, World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd..
    6. Ramaswami Mahalingam & Patturaja Selvaraj, 2022. "Ambedkar, Radical Interdependence and Dignity: A Study of Women Mall Janitors in India," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 177(4), pages 813-828, May.
    7. Shanthi Nataraj & Francisco Perez-Arce & Krishna B. Kumar & Sinduja V. Srinivasan, 2014. "The Impact Of Labor Market Regulation On Employment In Low-Income Countries: A Meta-Analysis," Journal of Economic Surveys, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 28(3), pages 551-572, July.
    8. Romain Duval & Prakash Loungani, 2021. "Designing Labor Market Institutions in Emerging Market and Developing Economies: A Review of Evidence and IMF Policy Advice," Comparative Economic Studies, Palgrave Macmillan;Association for Comparative Economic Studies, vol. 63(1), pages 31-83, March.
    9. Martin Rama, 2002. "Globalization and Workers in Developing Countries," Economics Study Area Working Papers 41, East-West Center, Economics Study Area.
    10. H. Zhou, 2001. "The Demand For Labour In Zimbabwe'S Engineering Industry: 1995–1997," South African Journal of Economics, Economic Society of South Africa, vol. 69(4), pages 734-751, December.
    11. Gerry Rodgers, 1992. "Institutional Economics, Development Economics and Labour Economics," The Pakistan Development Review, Pakistan Institute of Development Economics, vol. 31(4), pages 581-605.
    12. Anushree Karani & Rasananda Panda, 2018. "‘Make in India’ Campaign: Labour Law Reform Strategy and Its Impact on Job Creation Opportunities in India," Management and Labour Studies, XLRI Jamshedpur, School of Business Management & Human Resources, vol. 43(1-2), pages 58-69, February.
    13. Gayle Allard & Peter H. Lindert, 2006. "Euro-Productivity and Euro-Jobs since the 1960s: Which Institutions Really Mattered?," NBER Working Papers 12460, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    14. Selçuk GÜL, 2013. "Institutional Rigidities and Their Effects on Labor Demand in Turkey," Sosyoekonomi Journal, Sosyoekonomi Society, issue 20(20).
    15. Shyam Sundar, 2016. "Labour Law and Governance Reforms in India: A Partial and Misguided View of Employment Relations," Working Papers id:11065, eSocialSciences.
    16. Holzmann, Robert & Pouget, Yann & Vodopivec, Milan & Weber, Michael, 2011. "Severance Pay Programs around the World: History, Rationale, Status, and Reforms," IZA Discussion Papers 5731, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
    17. Bibhas Saha, 2006. "Labour Institutions in China and India," Journal of South Asian Development, , vol. 1(2), pages 179-205, October.
    18. Ghosh, Saibal, 2007. "Economic Geography of Industrial Location: Evidence from Indian States," MPRA Paper 22441, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    19. Vashisht, Pankaj, 2016. "Creating manufacturing jobs in India: Has openness to trade really helped?," Journal of Asian Economics, Elsevier, vol. 42(C), pages 53-64.
    20. Blessing Chiripanhura, 2005. "The Impacts Of Labour Market Liberalisation And Government Commitment To Reform: Zimbabwe, 1991-2000," Labor and Demography 0512013, University Library of Munich, Germany.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    markups; material-wage ratio; technical change; output mix; wage share; distribution of income; Indian industry;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • L - Industrial Organization
    • E - Macroeconomics and Monetary Economics
    • J - Labor and Demographic Economics
    • D1 - Microeconomics - - Household Behavior
    • D4 - Microeconomics - - Market Structure, Pricing, and Design

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wpa:wuwpio:0504020. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: EconWPA (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://econwpa.ub.uni-muenchen.de .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.