IDEAS home Printed from
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Real estate in studentified neighborhoods


  • Mira G. Baron
  • Ella R. Diamant


This work explores the impact of 'Studentification' of a neighborhood on the profitability of investment in the housing market. The study breaks down the impact of students on the housing market into two areas: apartments for sale and apartments for rent. The Israeli housing market provides the data for the empirical analysis. The market is different from other markets by the fact that the Israeli real estate investments market is at most 29% of the housing market, since 71% are owner occupied apartments. In order to address profitability, different scenarios have been explored. The classical urban economics model (Alonso, 1964, Mills, 1967 and Muth, 1969) claims that purchasing or renting an apartment close to CBD (Central Business District) will save on commuting costs and on travel time. Resulting in a high price of housing close to the CBD, and a decrease in price further away. Students renting an apartment adjacent to an academic institution (a Studentified neighborhood) will be willing to pay a higher rent and landlords will be willing to pay more for a house. A contrary argument is that students are poorer than the average population. Their willingness to pay for rent is lower, and the landlords will decrease their willingness to pay for houses for investment. An alternative argument is that landlords have an aversion to rent to students due to the claims that they are noisy, generate litter, involved in vandalism and have a negative effect on the neighborhood. In contrast the students want to rent in a Studentified neighborhood. The alternative scenarios are examined empirically in a case study of rents and housing prices in Haifa, Israel, a metropolitan area in the north of Israel. There are two academic institutions with 30 thousand undergraduate students in the city. The neighborhoods adjacent to one of the academic institutions are defined as Studentified. The students of the other institution are not concentrated around it since there is no supply of housing units. We define the neighborhoods in the rest of the city as Non-Studentified. We analyze the price of apartments sold in the period 2005- 2011 and the price of rental units in the period 2011-2012. The empirical results show that Studentification affects positively the rental prices and negatively the price of assets. These results are consistent with landlords' aversion to locations adjacent to academic institutions. The results of the econometric analysis were used to calculate the Sharpe Ratio to examine profitability in Studentified vs. Non-Studentified neighborhoods. In Studentified neighborhoods the return on a house is higher than the rest of the city (the rent is higher and the price of an asset is lower). However, in these neighborhoods the standard deviation is higher (measuring the risk). Thus the Sharpe Ratio, which measures the excess return per unit of risk, is similar in all the neighborhoods of the city. These results which characterize Haifa do not necessarily reflect other cities. It will require repetition of these tests to see what characterizes Studentified neighborhoods elsewhere.

Suggested Citation

  • Mira G. Baron & Ella R. Diamant, 2016. "Real estate in studentified neighborhoods," ERSA conference papers ersa16p642, European Regional Science Association.
  • Handle: RePEc:wiw:wiwrsa:ersa16p642

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL:
    Download Restriction: no

    References listed on IDEAS

    1. William F. Sharpe, 1964. "Capital Asset Prices: A Theory Of Market Equilibrium Under Conditions Of Risk," Journal of Finance, American Finance Association, vol. 19(3), pages 425-442, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Radosław Kurach, 2013. "Does Beta Explain Global Equity Market Volatility – Some Empirical Evidence," Contemporary Economics, University of Economics and Human Sciences in Warsaw., vol. 7(2), June.
    2. Shi, Yun & Cui, Xiangyu & Zhou, Xunyu, 2020. "Beta and Coskewness Pricing: Perspective from Probability Weighting," SocArXiv 5rqhv, Center for Open Science.
    3. Abugri, Benjamin A. & Dutta, Sandip, 2014. "Are we overestimating REIT idiosyncratic risk? Analysis of pricing effects and persistence," International Review of Economics & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 29(C), pages 249-259.
    4. Hany Shawky & Ronald Forbes & Alan Frankle, 1983. "Liquidity Services and Capital Market Equilibrium: The Case for Money Market Mutual Funds," Journal of Financial Research, Southern Finance Association;Southwestern Finance Association, vol. 6(2), pages 141-152, June.
    5. Giovanni Bonaccolto & Massimiliano Caporin & Sandra Paterlini, 2018. "Asset allocation strategies based on penalized quantile regression," Computational Management Science, Springer, vol. 15(1), pages 1-32, January.
    6. Sabur Mollah & Asma Mobarek, 2009. "Market volatility across countries – evidence from international markets," Studies in Economics and Finance, Emerald Group Publishing, vol. 26(4), pages 257-274, October.
    7. Shaikh, Salman, 2013. "Investment Decisions by Analysts: A Case Study of KSE," MPRA Paper 53802, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    8. Ali K. Ozdagli, 2012. "Financial Leverage, Corporate Investment, and Stock Returns," Review of Financial Studies, Society for Financial Studies, vol. 25(4), pages 1033-1069.
    9. Boes, M.J., 2006. "Index options : Pricing, implied densities and returns," Other publications TiSEM e9ed8a9f-2472-430a-b666-9, Tilburg University, School of Economics and Management.
    10. Turan G. Bali & Robert F. Engle & Yi Tang, 2017. "Dynamic Conditional Beta Is Alive and Well in the Cross Section of Daily Stock Returns," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 63(11), pages 3760-3779, November.
    11. Klein, Peter, 2004. "The capital gain lock-in effect and perfect substitutes," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 88(12), pages 2765-2783, December.
    12. Dimitrios G. Konstantinides & Georgios C. Zachos, 2019. "Exhibiting Abnormal Returns Under a Risk Averse Strategy," Methodology and Computing in Applied Probability, Springer, vol. 21(2), pages 551-566, June.
    13. Hooi Hooi Lean & Michael McAleer & Wing-Keung Wong, 2013. "Risk-averse and Risk-seeking Investor Preferences for Oil Spot and Futures," Documentos de Trabajo del ICAE 2013-31, Universidad Complutense de Madrid, Facultad de Ciencias Económicas y Empresariales, Instituto Complutense de Análisis Económico, revised Aug 2013.
    14. Michael E. Drew & Jon D. Stanford, 2003. "Retail Superannuation Management in Australia: Risk, Cost and Alpha," School of Economics and Finance Discussion Papers and Working Papers Series 126, School of Economics and Finance, Queensland University of Technology.
    15. Joanna Sokolowska & Patrycja Sleboda, 2015. "The Inverse Relation Between Risks and Benefits: The Role of Affect and Expertise," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 35(7), pages 1252-1267, July.
    16. Kruschwitz, Lutz & Löffler, Andreas & Lorenz, Daniela, 2019. "Divergent interest rates in the theory of financial markets," The Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 71(C), pages 48-55.
    17. Roman Mestre, 2021. "A wavelet approach of investing behaviors and their effects on risk exposures," Financial Innovation, Springer;Southwestern University of Finance and Economics, vol. 7(1), pages 1-37, December.
    18. repec:dau:papers:123456789/2514 is not listed on IDEAS
    19. Rocco Ciciretti & Ambrogio Dalò & Lammertjan Dam, 2017. "The Contributions of Betas versus Characteristics to the ESG Premium," CEIS Research Paper 413, Tor Vergata University, CEIS, revised 19 Dec 2019.
    20. Ladislav Kristoufek & Paulo Ferreira, 2018. "Capital asset pricing model in Portugal: Evidence from fractal regressions," Portuguese Economic Journal, Springer;Instituto Superior de Economia e Gestao, vol. 17(3), pages 173-183, November.
    21. Tomić, Bojan & Sesar, Andrijana & Džaja, Tomislav, 2014. "Komparativna analiza europskog tržišta kapitala i Dow Jones Industrial Average indeksa [Comparative analysis of european capital market and Dow Jones Industrial Average Index]," MPRA Paper 55555, University Library of Munich, Germany.

    More about this item


    Housing Market; Hedonic Prices; Studentification; Sharpe Ratio;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • R31 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - Real Estate Markets, Spatial Production Analysis, and Firm Location - - - Housing Supply and Markets
    • G11 - Financial Economics - - General Financial Markets - - - Portfolio Choice; Investment Decisions

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:


    Access and download statistics


    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wiw:wiwrsa:ersa16p642. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: . General contact details of provider: .

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Gunther Maier (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service hosted by the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis . RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.