The structure, regulation, and performance of pension funds in nine industrial countries
The author offers an overview of issues relating to the development of funded pension schemes in industrial countries. The analysis applies the economic theory of pension regulation to experience with the structure, regulation, and performance of funds in nine countries - Canada, Denmark, Germany, Japan, Netherlands, Sweden, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States - seeking to shed light on the finance of old age security in developing countries and the reform of pension funds in industrial countries. The main points of the analysis follow. Pension funds are either defined benefit or defined contribution. The individual bears more risk with defined contribution plans because the pension benefit depends on asset returns. Conceptually, defined benefit funds offer better employee retirement insurance. Private defined benefit pensions are generally available only through companies and typically include some restriction of labor mobility. Because of some shortcomings of fully or largely funded plans, especially for income redistribution, governments have chosen to maintain at least basic levels of pay-as-you-go social security. The scope of such unfunded social security schemes is the key determinant of the scale of private retirement savings. The extent to which pension funds are used as a vehicle for retirement saving depends on the regulatory regime. Tax advantages are the most important incentive, but a wide range of other regulatory choices also make pension funds more or less attractive to firms and employees. And some regulations, such as those affecting the portability of pensions, may have important consequences for economic efficiency. Though countries differ widely in their regulation of pension funds, some suggestions for good practice can still be made. Whether pension funds are a cost effective way of providing pensions depends on the real asset returns that can be attained, in relation to the growth of real wages. Ideally, there should be a gap of 2 to 3 percent between them. Portfolio distributions and fund management are the key determinants of returns to pension funds, subject to the returns available in the market. Prudent diversification in domestic and foreign markets and indexation of much of pension funds'portfolios both appear to be important. Pension funds affect capital markets in many ways. They influence market structure and demand for securities; stimulate innovation, allocative efficiency, and market development; and have a positive effect on overall saving. They may also have some deleterious effects, such as increases in volatility, short termism, and weakening of the control exerted by investors and creditors over firms. Prospects for pension funds in industrial countries vary with the maturity of existing funds and the generosity of social security benefits. In countries such as France, Germany, and Italy, growth in coming decades could be sizable. The key recommendations for countries that are just starting pension funds are for a mix of social security and private funds; for separate funding rather than book reserves; for defined benefit plans, subject to appropriate regulation; and for company-based pension funds.
|Date of creation:||31 Dec 1993|
|Date of revision:|
|Contact details of provider:|| Postal: 1818 H Street, N.W., Washington, DC 20433|
Phone: (202) 477-1234
Web page: http://www.worldbank.org/
More information through EDIRC
Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.:
- Bradford Cornell & Richard Roll, 1981. "Strategies for Pairwise Competition in Markets and Organizations," Bell Journal of Economics, The RAND Corporation, vol. 12(1), pages 201-213, Spring.
- Steven F. Venti & David A. Wise, 1987.
"IRAs and Saving,"
in: The Effects of Taxation on Capital Accumulation, pages 7-52
National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
- Alan J. Auerbach, 1988. "Corporate Takeovers: Causes and Consequences," NBER Books, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc, number auer88-1, September.
- Lakonishok, Joseph & Shleifer, Andrei & Vishny, Robert W., 1992. "The Structure and Performance of the Money Management Industry," Scholarly Articles 10498059, Harvard University Department of Economics.
- Zvi Bodie, 1989.
"Pensions as Retirement Income Insurance,"
NBER Working Papers
2917, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
- Barro, Robert J., 1974.
"Are Government Bonds Net Wealth?,"
3451399, Harvard University Department of Economics.
- Martin Feldstein & Jeffrey B. Liebman, 2001.
NBER Working Papers
8451, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
- Robert C. Merton, 1992. "Financial Innovation And Economic Performance," Journal of Applied Corporate Finance, Morgan Stanley, vol. 4(4), pages 12-22.
- Grossman, Sanford J & Stiglitz, Joseph E, 1980.
"On the Impossibility of Informationally Efficient Markets,"
American Economic Review,
American Economic Association, vol. 70(3), pages 393-408, June.
- Sanford J Grossman & Joseph E Stiglitz, 1997. "On the Impossibility of Informationally Efficient Markets," Levine's Working Paper Archive 1908, David K. Levine.
- Zvi Bodie & John B. Shoven & David A. Wise, 1988. "Pensions in the U.S. Economy," NBER Books, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc, number bodi88-1, September.
- Diamond, P. A., 1977. "A framework for social security analysis," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 8(3), pages 275-298, December.
- B. Douglas Bernheim & John B. Shoven, 1988.
"Pension Funding and Saving,"
in: Pensions in the U.S. Economy, pages 85-114
National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
- Vittas, Dimitri & Skully, Michael, 1991. "Overview of contractual savings institutions," Policy Research Working Paper Series 605, The World Bank.
- Feldstein, Martin, 1978.
"Do private pensions increase national savings?,"
Journal of Public Economics,
Elsevier, vol. 10(3), pages 277-293, December.
- Alicia H. Munnell., 1992. "Current taxation of qualified pension plans: has the time come?," New England Economic Review, Federal Reserve Bank of Boston, issue Mar, pages 12-25.
When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wbk:wbrwps:1229. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Roula I. Yazigi)
If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.