IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/wbk/wbrwps/11007.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Measuring the Risk of Corruption and Its Price Impact in North Macedonia 2011–2022

Author

Listed:
  • Fazekas,Mihaly
  • Abdou,Aly
  • Ibrahimi,Klea
  • Tóth,Bence
  • Veljanov,Zdravko

Abstract

Public procurement in North Macedonia amounted to 16 percent of total government expenditure in 2018, or 5 percent of gross domestic product. The country’s public procurement is also vulnerable to corruption risks, which typically push prices up, leading to overspending. To support better budget policies, this paper maps corruption and state capture risks using administrative data on public procurement and examines their impact on prices. The analysis finds that overall corruption risk decreased slightly in 2011–22, with, for example, the single bidding rate remaining around 30 percent. Estimated overpricing at the contracting stage due to corruption risks ranged between 5 and 6 percent of spending throughout the period. The highest savings potentials are presented by lowering single bidding, increasing the use of a simplified open procedure, and advertising tendering opportunities longer. Network analysis of contracting relationships reveals that the 2017 change in government weakened the centrality of high corruption risk groups of organizations, leading to an overall higher integrity core.

Suggested Citation

  • Fazekas,Mihaly & Abdou,Aly & Ibrahimi,Klea & Tóth,Bence & Veljanov,Zdravko, 2024. "Measuring the Risk of Corruption and Its Price Impact in North Macedonia 2011–2022," Policy Research Working Paper Series 11007, The World Bank.
    • Handle: RePEc:wbk:wbrwps:11007
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/099354012192440312/pdf/IDU-e8b27e8d-a15e-4c77-8145-f021dc9840d4.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ján Palguta & Filip Pertold, 2017. "Manipulation of Procurement Contracts: Evidence from the Introduction of Discretionary Thresholds," American Economic Journal: Economic Policy, American Economic Association, vol. 9(2), pages 293-315, May.
    2. Fazekas,Mihaly & Poltoratskaia,Viktoriia & Tóth,Bence, 2023. "Corruption Risks and State Capture in Bulgarian Public Procurement," Policy Research Working Paper Series 10444, The World Bank.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Harouna Sedgo & Luc Désiré Omgba, 2023. "Corruption and distortion of public expenditures: evidence from Africa," International Tax and Public Finance, Springer;International Institute of Public Finance, vol. 30(2), pages 419-452, April.
    2. Christian Cox, 2023. "Lobbying for government appropriations," RAND Journal of Economics, RAND Corporation, vol. 54(3), pages 443-483, September.
    3. Bedri Kamil Onur Tas, 2023. "Bunching below thresholds to manipulate public procurement," Empirical Economics, Springer, vol. 64(1), pages 303-319, January.
    4. Titl, Vitezslav & De Witte, Kristof & Geys, Benny, 2021. "Political donations, public procurement and government efficiency," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 148(C).
    5. Rodrigo Carril, 2021. "Rules Versus Discretion in Public Procurement," Working Papers 1232, Barcelona School of Economics.
    6. Marly Tatiana Celis Galvez & Vitezslav Titl & Fredo Schotanus, 2025. "Discretion and political favoritism: Evidence from two reforms in public procurement," Southern Economic Journal, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 91(3), pages 915-968, January.
    7. S meyra Atmaca, 2020. "Application Period in Reverse Auctions," Working Papers of Faculty of Economics and Business Administration, Ghent University, Belgium 20/993, Ghent University, Faculty of Economics and Business Administration.
    8. Bustos, Emil & Engist, Oliver & Martinsson, Gustav & Thomann, Christian, 2022. "Financing Constraints and Risk Management: Evidence From Micro-Level Insurance Data," Working Paper Series 1452, Research Institute of Industrial Economics.
    9. Mondjeli, Itchoko Motande Mwa Ndjokou & Ambassa, Martin, 2025. "Does corruption really matter for the structure of public expenditures?," Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, Elsevier, vol. 73(C), pages 181-195.
    10. J Gallego & M Prem & J. F Vargas, 2020. "Corruption in the times of pandemia," Documentos de Trabajo 18178, Universidad del Rosario.
    11. Kuliomina, Jekaterina, 2021. "Do personal characteristics of councilors affect municipal budget allocation?," European Journal of Political Economy, Elsevier, vol. 70(C).
    12. Tkachenko, Andrey, 2022. "State-business relations and access to external financing," BOFIT Discussion Papers 10/2022, Bank of Finland, Institute for Economies in Transition.
    13. Titl, Vitezslav & Geys, Benny, 2019. "Political donations and the allocation of public procurement contracts," European Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 111(C), pages 443-458.
    14. Hoekman, Bernard & Onur Taş, Bedri Kamil, 2024. "Discretion and public procurement outcomes in Europe," European Journal of Political Economy, Elsevier, vol. 82(C).
    15. Tkachenko, Andrey, 2022. "State-business relations and access to external financing," BOFIT Discussion Papers 10/2022, Bank of Finland Institute for Emerging Economies (BOFIT).
    16. Brad Nathan, 2024. "Show Your Hand: The Impacts of Fair Pricing Requirements in Procurement Contracting," Journal of Accounting Research, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 62(4), pages 1405-1448, September.
    17. Audinga Baltrunaite & Cristina Giorgiantonio & Sauro Mocetti & Tommaso Orlando, 2021. "Discretion and Supplier Selection in Public Procurement," The Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization, Oxford University Press, vol. 37(1), pages 134-166.
    18. Vitezslav Titl, 2023. "The One and Only: Single-Bidding in Public Procurement," Working Papers 2308, Utrecht School of Economics.
    19. Bedri Kamil Onur Tas, 2019. "Bunching Below Thresholds to Manipulate Public Procurement," RSCAS Working Papers 2019/17, European University Institute.
    20. TANG, Wei & WANG, Yuan & WU, Jiameng, 2025. "Local favoritism in China's public procurement: Information frictions or incentive distortion?," Journal of Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 145(C).

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wbk:wbrwps:11007. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Roula I. Yazigi (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/dvewbus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.