IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/wbk/hdnspu/197453.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

De Jure and De Facto Coverage of Parental Benefits in Nepal

Author

Listed:
  • Ambika Sharma
  • Himanshi Jain

Abstract

Women constitute nearly half of the young working age-population in Nepal but are less likely than men to participate in the labor force. When employed, they work largely in informal, or subsistence work characterized by inadequate social protection and are subject to lower wages relative to men. A key factor behind these outcomes is that childcare responsibilities fall primarily on women with little or inadequate support at work, in the family, or more broadly at a societal level. A holistic and inclusive parental benefits framework which includes all parents (men and women), and all working individuals irrespective of type of employment (formal, informal, part time), is required to bridge the gap between childcare responsibilities and employment for women. The design and implementation of such benefits in developing economies must be cognizant to the trade-offs arising from source of financing (payroll or general revenue); and extent of cost-sharing. This study examines the laws, policies and schemes governing parental benefits in Nepal to outline de-jure coverage. It then presents the results of a survey with 1000 workers in urban Nepal that identify de-facto coverage of these benefits and enquires about labor market choices of mothers and fathers. Four key messages emerge. First, the formal sector workforce, which is less than 10 percent of the employed in Nepal ha s legislated coverage of the key parental benefits, but suffers from gaps in awareness, and compliance. Second, workers in the informal sector currently lack parental benefits, 28 percent of whom have to borrow money around childbirth while others stop work, reduce hours or dip into savings. Third, there is a willingness to contribute among informal sector workers, to the recently launched social insurance scheme that includes maternity benefits. Finally, women in Nepal are more likely to shift in and out of employment based on childbirth and childrearing constraints, while men are less likely to use childcare as a factor in work decisions, signaling the need for policies to be complemented with a sustainable social norm change.

Suggested Citation

  • Ambika Sharma & Himanshi Jain, 2025. "De Jure and De Facto Coverage of Parental Benefits in Nepal," Social Protection Discussion Papers and Notes 197453, The World Bank.
  • Handle: RePEc:wbk:hdnspu:197453
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/099021925113581657/pdf/P176617-d407e288-473e-41f2-adde-ba735b9a8b83.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Olivier Thévenon & Anne Solaz, 2013. "Labour Market Effects of Parental Leave Policies in OECD Countries," OECD Social, Employment and Migration Working Papers 141, OECD Publishing.
    2. World Bank, 2023. "Women, Business and the Law 2023 [La Mujer, la Empresa y el Derecho 2023]," World Bank Publications - Books, The World Bank Group, number 39462, August.
    3. Mansdotter, Anna & Lindholm, Lars & Winkvist, Anna, 2007. "Paternity leave in Sweden--Costs, savings and health gains," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 82(1), pages 102-115, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Persson, Petra & Rossin-Slater, Maya, 2019. "When Dad Can Stay Home: Fathers' Workplace Flexibility and Maternal Health," IZA Discussion Papers 12386, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
    2. Duffy, Sarah & van Esch, Patrick & Yousef, Murooj, 2020. "Increasing parental leave uptake: A systems social marketing approach," Australasian marketing journal, Elsevier, vol. 28(2), pages 110-118.
    3. Jones, Kelly & Wilcher, Britni, 2024. "Reducing maternal labor market detachment: A role for paid family leave," Labour Economics, Elsevier, vol. 87(C).
    4. Borbála Júlia Szczuka, 2022. "Climate Change Concerns and the Ideal Number of Children: A Comparative Analysis of the V4 Countries," Social Inclusion, Cogitatio Press, vol. 10(3), pages 206-216.
    5. Filser, Andreas & Achard, Pascal & Frodermann, Corinna & Müller, Dana & Wagner, Sander, 2024. "Stratification of Post-Birth Labour Supply in a High- and Low- Maternal Employment Regime," SocArXiv tn5v7, Center for Open Science.
    6. Iris Delgado & Baltica Cabieses & Mauricio Apablaza & Carla Castillo & Ximena Aguilera & Isabel Matute & Manuel Najera & Juan M Pericàs & Joan Benach, 2019. "Evaluation of the effectiveness and equity of the maternity protection reform in Chile from 2000 to 2015," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 14(9), pages 1-16, September.
    7. Emily Sinnott & Maurizio Bussolo & Johannes Koettl, 2015. "Golden Aging," World Bank Publications - Books, The World Bank Group, number 22018, August.
    8. Anna Oksuzyan & Angela Carollo & Sven Drefahl & Carlo G. Camarda & Kaare Christensen & Alyson A. van Raalte, 2017. "Does the age difference between partners influence the career achievements of women?," MPIDR Working Papers WP-2017-008, Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research, Rostock, Germany.
    9. Angela Carollo & Kaare Christensen & Anna Oksuzyan & Sven Drefahl & Alyson van Raalte & Carlo Giovanni Camarda & Linda Juel Ahrenfeldt, 2019. "Is the age difference between partners related to women's earnings?," Demographic Research, Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research, Rostock, Germany, vol. 41(15), pages 425-460.
    10. Ludovica Cherchi & Himanshi Jain, 2025. "Awareness, Access, and Perceptions around Parental Benefits among Urban Argentinians," Social Protection Discussion Papers and Notes 197190, The World Bank.
    11. Guyonne Kalb, 2018. "Paid Parental Leave and Female Labour Supply: AÂ Review," The Economic Record, The Economic Society of Australia, vol. 94(304), pages 80-100, March.
    12. Estefanía Galván & Cecilia Parada & Martina Querejeta & Soledad Salvador, 2024. "Gender Gaps and Family Leaves in Latin America," Review of Economics of the Household, Springer, vol. 22(2), pages 387-414, June.
    13. Martina Querejeta Rabosto & Marisa Bucheli, 2021. "Motherhood Penalties: the Effect of Childbirth on Women's Employment Dynamics in a Developing Country," Documentos de Trabajo (working papers) 0121, Department of Economics - dECON.
    14. Borbála Júlia Szczuka, 2022. "Climate Change Concerns and the Ideal Number of Children: A Comparative Analysis of the V4 Countries," Social Inclusion, Cogitatio Press, vol. 10(3), pages 206-216.
    15. Ewa Cukrowska-Torzewska & Anna Matysiak, 2018. "The Motherhood Wage Penalty: A Meta-Analysis," VID Working Papers 1808, Vienna Institute of Demography (VID) of the Austrian Academy of Sciences in Vienna.
    16. Rapp, Thomas & Jena, Anupam B. & Costa-Font, Joan & Grabowski, David C., 2023. "Caregiving across generations: Do older adults with more grandchildren get another bite at the “sandwich” generation?," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 334(C).
    17. Sunnee Billingsley & Gerda Neyer & Katharina Wesolowski, 2022. "Social Investment Policies and Childbearing Across 20 Countries: Longitudinal and Micro-Level Analyses," European Journal of Population, Springer;European Association for Population Studies, vol. 38(5), pages 951-974, December.
    18. Brudevold-Newman,Andrew Peter & Donald,Aletheia Amalia & Rouanet,Lea Marie, 2023. "Steered Away from the Fields : Short-Term Impacts of Oxen on Agricultural Production andIntra-household Labor Supply," Policy Research Working Paper Series 10516, The World Bank.
    19. Sarah H. Bana & Kelly Bedard & Maya Rossin‐Slater, 2020. "The Impacts of Paid Family Leave Benefits: Regression Kink Evidence from California Administrative Data," Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 39(4), pages 888-929, September.
    20. Anna Lovász, 2016. "Childcare expansion and mothers’ employment in post-socialist countries," IZA World of Labor, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA), pages 319-319, December.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wbk:hdnspu:197453. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Aaron F Buchsbaum (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/wrldbus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.