IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/udc/wpaper/wp529.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

¿Cual es el efecto de shocks de demanda interna sobre la inflacion en una economia pequena y abierta? Chile 2000-2021

Author

Listed:
  • Ramon E. Lopez
  • Kevin Sepulveda

Abstract

Este estudio intenta descomponer los diversos factores que determinan la inflacion en Chile durante el periodo 2000-2021. Encontramos que los principales determinantes de la inflacion interna son de origen externo y el tipo de cambio. La demanda interna ha jugado un rol mas bien limitado como factor inflacionario. En general en periodos normales los aumentos de demanda interna explican no mas de un 20% de la inflacion observada. La inflacion promedio mensual observada durante el periodo 2000-2021 alcanzo un 0,3%. De eso estimamos que los aumentos de demanda en periodos normales explican una inflacion de 0.06% mensual. Sorprendentemente, los extraordinarios periodos de rapida aceleracion de la demanda como efecto de politicas fiscales altamente expansivas y/o retiros de AFP tuvieron un efecto mas bien modesto en la aceleracion de la inflacion. Solamente en los ultimos 5 meses de 2021 podemos detectar un efecto de expansion de la demanda cuando explica casi un 33% de la aceleracion inflacionaria que ocurre en esos meses. Este estudio corrobora un hecho esperable para una economia pequena y abierta como la chilena; la mayor parte de la inflacion domestica esta determinada por la inflacion externa.

Suggested Citation

  • Ramon E. Lopez & Kevin Sepulveda, 2022. "¿Cual es el efecto de shocks de demanda interna sobre la inflacion en una economia pequena y abierta? Chile 2000-2021," Working Papers wp529, University of Chile, Department of Economics.
  • Handle: RePEc:udc:wpaper:wp529
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://econ.uchile.cl/uploads/publicacion/b514742bdeba2b873e9b8214e515dea78e7ba81d.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. H. Levent Korap & Ozgur Aslan, 2010. "Re-examination of the long-run purchasing power parity: further evidence from Turkey," Applied Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 42(27), pages 3559-3564.
    2. Todd E. Clark, 2004. "Can out-of-sample forecast comparisons help prevent overfitting?," Journal of Forecasting, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 23(2), pages 115-139.
    3. Hegwood, Natalie D & Papell, David H, 1998. "Quasi Purchasing Power Parity," International Journal of Finance & Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 3(4), pages 279-289, October.
    4. Crownover, Collin & Pippenger, John & Steigerwald, Douglas G., 1996. "Testing for absolute purchasing power parity," Journal of International Money and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 15(5), pages 783-796, October.
    5. Munehisa Kasuya & Kozo Ueda, 2000. "Testing the Purchasing Power Parity Hypothesis: Re-examination by Additional Variables, Tests with Known Cointegrating Vectors, Monte Carlo Critical Values, and Fractional Cointegration," Bank of Japan Working Paper Series Research and Statistics D, Bank of Japan.
    6. César Calderón & Roberto Duncan, 2003. "Purchasing power parity in an emerging market economy: a long- span study for Chile," Estudios de Economia, University of Chile, Department of Economics, vol. 30(1 Year 20), pages 103-132, June.
    7. Hongjun Li & Zhongjian Lin & Cheng Hsiao, 2015. "Testing purchasing power parity hypothesis: a semiparametric varying coefficient approach," Empirical Economics, Springer, vol. 48(1), pages 427-438, February.
    8. Alan M. Taylor, 2002. "A Century Of Purchasing-Power Parity," The Review of Economics and Statistics, MIT Press, vol. 84(1), pages 139-150, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. López, Ramón & Sepúlveda, Kevin A., 2022. "The effects of domestic demand shocks on inflation in a small open economy: Chile in the period 2000–2021," Revista CEPAL, Naciones Unidas Comisión Económica para América Latina y el Caribe (CEPAL), December.
    2. Marcos José Dal Bianco, 2008. "Argentinean real exchange rate 1900-2006, test purchasing power parity theory," Estudios de Economia, University of Chile, Department of Economics, vol. 35(1 Year 20), pages 33-64, June.
    3. Jorge Miranda P., 2013. "Deviation of the purchasing power parity hypothesis and equilibrium real exchange rate: Chile 1986-2011," Journal Economía Chilena (The Chilean Economy), Central Bank of Chile, vol. 16(3), pages 04-31, December.
    4. Astorga, Pablo, 2012. "Mean reversion in long-horizon real exchange rates: Evidence from Latin America," Journal of International Money and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 31(6), pages 1529-1550.
    5. Lucio Sarno, 2003. "Nonlinear Exchange Rate Models: A Selective Overview," Rivista di Politica Economica, SIPI Spa, vol. 93(4), pages 3-46, July-Augu.
    6. Mark Holmes & Jesús Otero & Theodore Panagiotidis, 2012. "PPP in OECD Countries: An Analysis of Real Exchange Rate Stationarity, Cross-Sectional Dependency and Structural Breaks," Open Economies Review, Springer, vol. 23(5), pages 767-783, November.
    7. Tri WIDODO, 2015. "Purchasing Power Parity And Productivity-Bias Hypothesis," Review of Economic and Business Studies, Alexandru Ioan Cuza University, Faculty of Economics and Business Administration, issue 16, pages 9-38, December.
    8. Astorga, Pablo, 2007. "Real exchange rates in Latin America : what does the 20th century reveal?," IFCS - Working Papers in Economic History.WH wp07-03, Universidad Carlos III de Madrid. Instituto Figuerola.
    9. Alejandro D. Jacobo & Simón Sosvilla‐Rivero, 2021. "An empirical examination of purchasing power parity: Argentina 1810–2016," International Journal of Finance & Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 26(2), pages 2064-2073, April.
    10. Narayan Paresh K & Prasad Biman Chand, 2005. "The Validity of Purchasing Power Parity Hypothesis for Eleven Middle Eastern Countries," Review of Middle East Economics and Finance, De Gruyter, vol. 3(2), pages 44-58, August.
    11. Maican, Florin G. & Sweeney, Richard J., 2013. "Real exchange rate adjustment in European transition countries," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 37(3), pages 907-926.
    12. Angelos Kanas, 2009. "Real exchange rate, stationarity, and economic fundamentals," Journal of Economics and Finance, Springer;Academy of Economics and Finance, vol. 33(4), pages 393-409, October.
    13. Gawon Yoon, 2009. "Purchasing power parity and long memory," Applied Economics Letters, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 16(1), pages 55-61.
    14. Prodan, Ruxandra, 2008. "Potential Pitfalls in Determining Multiple Structural Changes With an Application to Purchasing Power Parity," Journal of Business & Economic Statistics, American Statistical Association, vol. 26, pages 50-65, January.
    15. César Calderón & Roberto Duncan, 2003. "Purchasing power parity in an emerging market economy: a long- span study for Chile," Estudios de Economia, University of Chile, Department of Economics, vol. 30(1 Year 20), pages 103-132, June.
    16. Muhammad Zakaria & Seemab Tanveer & Bashir Ahmad Fida & Muhammad Iftikhar ul Husnain, 2023. "Inflation Differential Pass-Through to Exchange Rate: Some Evidence From Pakistan," SAGE Open, , vol. 13(4), pages 21582440231, December.
    17. Widodo, Tri, 2007. "Productivity Differentials and Purchasing Power Parity: Cases of Indonesia and Korea," MPRA Paper 78217, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    18. Hwa-Taek Lee & Gawon Yoon, 2013. "Does purchasing power parity hold sometimes? Regime switching in real exchange rates," Applied Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 45(16), pages 2279-2294, June.
    19. Astorga, Pablo, 2012. "Mean reversion in long-horizon real exchange rates: Evidence from Latin America," Journal of International Money and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 31(6), pages 1529-1550.
    20. Miranda, Jorge, 2012. "Tipo de Cambio Real en Chile: Dinámica, Tendencia y Equilibrio [Real Exchange Rate in Chile: Dynamics, Trend and Equilibrium]," MPRA Paper 43076, University Library of Munich, Germany.

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:udc:wpaper:wp529. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Mohit Karnani (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/deuclcl.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.