IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/udc/wpaper/wp229.html

Antecedentes para el Diseño de una Política Tecnológica Nacional

Author

Listed:
  • José Miguel Benavente

Abstract

El principal objetivo de este informe es entregar los antecedentes necesarios para evaluar la situación del apoyo público actual a este tipo de actividades. Con este fin, se realiza un trabajo pionero de caracterización de la situación chilena respecto a sus esfuerzos en investigación científica y desarrollo tecnológico como también un esbozo de la forma en que puede ser implementado un Plan Nacional de Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación. El documento está organizado en cinco grandes capítulos. En el primero de ellos se discute la importancia de las actividades innovativas en el crecimiento económico junto a una caracterización de la situación actual del país en este tipo de actividades. En el segundo capítulo se discuten los aspectos teóricos que justifican la participación activa del estado en la promoción y financiamiento de actividades científico-tecnológicas. En el tercer capítulo se revisa la evidencia internacional acerca de las mejores formas de diseño institucional orientados a promover este tipo de actividades enfatizando fortalezas y debilidades de las diferentes alternativas. En seguida, en el cuarto capítulo, se caracteriza la arquitectura institucional chilena vigente de apoyo a la investigación y desarrollo realizando un análisis crítico de su operación, eficiencia y pertinencia. En el capítulo final se sugiere la forma de implementación de un Plan de Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación la que considera entre sus directrices, los lineamientos generales que deberían guiar una modificación de la institucionalidad de apoyo vigente en este tipo de actividades.

Suggested Citation

  • José Miguel Benavente, 2006. "Antecedentes para el Diseño de una Política Tecnológica Nacional," Working Papers wp229, University of Chile, Department of Economics.
    • Handle: RePEc:udc:wpaper:wp229
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.econ.uchile.cl/uploads/publicacion/671402d6-ff7f-46dc-8d4d-be53383d9c76.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Martin, Stephen & Scott, John T., 2000. "The nature of innovation market failure and the design of public support for private innovation," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 29(4-5), pages 437-447, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. José Miguel Benavente H., 2005. "Technological Innovation in Chile: Where we are and what can be Done," Journal Econom a Chilena (The Chilean Economy), Central Bank of Chile, vol. 8(1), pages 53-77, April.
    2. Andrés Zahler & Claudio Bravo Ortega & Daniel Goya & José Miguel Benavente, 2014. "Public-Private Collaboration on Productive Development in Chile," IDB Publications (Working Papers) 85078, Inter-American Development Bank.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Gamal Atallah & Marcel Boyer, 2002. "Le financement et l'évaluation de la performance des universités: l'expérience anglaise," CIRANO Project Reports 2002rp-14, CIRANO.
    2. Serhat Burmaoglu & Ozcan Saritas, 2019. "An evolutionary analysis of the innovation policy domain: Is there a paradigm shift?," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 118(3), pages 823-847, March.
    3. Kirstin Lindloff & Nadine Pieper & Nils C. Bandelow & David M. Woisetschläger, 2014. "Drivers of carsharing diffusion in Germany: an actor-centred approach," International Journal of Automotive Technology and Management, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 14(3/4), pages 217-245.
    4. Klerkx, Laurens & Leeuwis, Cees, 2008. "Institutionalizing end-user demand steering in agricultural R&D: Farmer levy funding of R&D in The Netherlands," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 37(3), pages 460-472, April.
    5. Stavins, Robert & Jaffe, Adam & Newell, Richard, 2000. "Technological Change and the Environment," Working Paper Series rwp00-002, Harvard University, John F. Kennedy School of Government.
    6. Konstantinos Panagiotakopoulos & Jose Maria Fernandez-Crehuet & José Molero Zayas, 2018. "Public Finance of R&D and the Obstacles to Innovation: The Case of Spain," International Journal of Social Science Studies, Redfame publishing, vol. 6(12), pages 1-21, December.
    7. Harrison, Richard T. & Bock, Adam J. & Gregson, Geoff, 2020. "Stairway to heaven? rethinking angel investment policy and practice," Journal of Business Venturing Insights, Elsevier, vol. 14(C).
    8. Gao, Kang & Yuan, Yijun, 2022. "Government intervention, spillover effect and urban innovation performance: Empirical evidence from national innovative city pilot policy in China," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 70(C).
    9. Scandura, Alessandra & Bolzani, Daniela, 2020. "The Role of Collaboration Networks for Innovation in Immigrant-Owned New Technology-Based Firms," Department of Economics and Statistics Cognetti de Martiis LEI & BRICK - Laboratory of Economics of Innovation "Franco Momigliano", Bureau of Research in Innovation, Complexity and Knowledge, Collegio 202004, University of Turin.
    10. Ivano D'Antonio & Alessandro De Iudicibus & Giuseppe Piroli & Francesco Savoia, 2014. "Ricerca e innovazione in campania: una valutazione controfattuale della politica di coesione," STUDI ECONOMICI, FrancoAngeli Editore, vol. 2014(113), pages 61-87.
    11. Yang, Jingluan & Liu, Weidong, 2024. "Knowledge source switching under state interventions of latecomer regions: A case study of Shenzhen," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 79(C).
    12. Giulio Guarini & Giuseppe Garofalo & Alessandro Federici, 2014. "A Virtuous Cumulative Growth Circle among Innovation, Inclusion and Sustainability? A Structuralist-Keynesian Analysis with an Application on Europe," GREDEG Working Papers 2014-39, Groupe de REcherche en Droit, Economie, Gestion (GREDEG CNRS), Université Côte d'Azur, France.
    13. Serge Coulombe, 2001. "Should Canadian Regions Adopt the U.S. Dollar?," Working Papers 0106E, University of Ottawa, Department of Economics.
    14. Phillip Phan & Donald S. Siegel & Mike Wright, 2016. "Science Parks and Incubators: Observations, Synthesis and Future Research," World Scientific Book Chapters, in: Phillip H Phan & Sarfraz A Mian & Wadid Lamine (ed.), TECHNOLOGY ENTREPRENEURSHIP AND BUSINESS INCUBATION Theory • Practice • Lessons Learned, chapter 9, pages 249-272, World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd..
    15. Sinclair Davidson & Jason Potts, 2016. "The Social Costs of Innovation Policy," Economic Affairs, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 36(3), pages 282-293, October.
    16. Leslie M. Shiell, 2004. "Classical (Generalized) Utilitarianism and the Repugnant Conclusion," Working Papers 0404E, University of Ottawa, Department of Economics.
    17. Gamal Atallah, 2014. "Conditional R&D subsidies," Economics of Innovation and New Technology, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 23(2), pages 179-214, March.
    18. Siotis, Georges & Marín Uribe, Pedro Luis, 2002. "Public Policies Towards Research Joint Venture Formation: Designs and Outcomes," CEPR Discussion Papers 3772, Centre for Economic Policy Research.
    19. Beck, Mathias & Lopes-Bento, Cindy & Schenker-Wicki, Andrea, 2016. "Radical or incremental: Where does R&D policy hit?," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 45(4), pages 869-883.
    20. Jochen Lorentzen & Peter Møllgaard, 2006. "Competition Policy and Innovation," Chapters, in: Patrizio Bianchi & Sandrine Labory (ed.), International Handbook on Industrial Policy, chapter 6, Edward Elgar Publishing.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:udc:wpaper:wp229. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Mohit Karnani (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/deuclcl.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.