IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ucf/indipa/indipa795.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

One in Three: Internet Governance and Children’s Rights

Author

Listed:
  • Sonia Livingstone
  • Jasmina Byrne
  • John Carr

Abstract

Typically, in the discussions around the use of the Internet, children are acknowledged only in the context of child protection while their rights to provision and participation are overlooked. This paper specifically argues against an age-generic (or ‘age-blind’) approach to ‘users’, because children have specific needs and rights that are not met by governance regimes designed for ‘everyone’. Policy and governance should now ensure children’s rights to access and use digital media and consider how the deployment of the Internet by wider society can enhance children’s rights across the board. The paper ends with six conclusions and recommendations about how to embed recognition of children’s rights in the activities and policies of international Internet governance institutions.

Suggested Citation

  • Sonia Livingstone & Jasmina Byrne & John Carr, 2016. "One in Three: Internet Governance and Children’s Rights," Papers indipa795, Innocenti Discussion Papers.
    • Handle: RePEc:ucf:indipa:indipa795
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Nye, Joseph S., 2014. "The Regime Complex for Managing Global Cyber Activities," Scholarly Articles 12308565, Harvard Kennedy School of Government.
    2. Gerison Lansdown, 2005. "The Evolving Capacities of the Child," Papers innins05/18, Innocenti Insights.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. C. Randall Henning, 2019. "Regime Complexity and the Institutions of Crisis and Development Finance," Development and Change, International Institute of Social Studies, vol. 50(1), pages 24-45, January.
    2. Kenneth W. Abbott & Benjamin Faude, 2022. "Hybrid institutional complexes in global governance," The Review of International Organizations, Springer, vol. 17(2), pages 263-291, April.
    3. Levinson, Nanette S., 2021. "Idea entrepreneurs: The United Nations Open-Ended Working Group & cybersecurity," Telecommunications Policy, Elsevier, vol. 45(6).
    4. Ian Johnstone & Joshua Lincoln, 2022. "Global Governance in an Era of Pluralism," Global Policy, London School of Economics and Political Science, vol. 13(4), pages 563-570, September.
    5. Lise H MacEachnie & Hanne B Larsen & Ingrid Egerod, 2018. "Children's and young people's experiences of a parent's critical illness and admission to the intensive care unit: A qualitative meta‐synthesis," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 27(15-16), pages 2923-2932, August.
    6. Harder, Annemiek T. & Mann-Feder, Varda & Oterholm, Inger & Refaeli, Tehila, 2020. "Supporting transitions to adulthood for youth leaving care: Consensus based principles," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 116(C).
    7. Geng Qin & Hanzhi Yu & Chao Wu, 2023. "Global governance for digital sequence information on genetic resources: Demand, progress and reforming paths," Global Policy, London School of Economics and Political Science, vol. 14(2), pages 403-415, May.
    8. Natasha Blanchet-Cohen, 2009. "Children, Agency and Violence: In and beyond the United Nations study on violence against children," Papers inwopa09/64, Innocenti Working Papers.
    9. Stoebenau, Kirsten & Heise, Lori & Wamoyi, Joyce & Bobrova, Natalia, 2016. "Revisiting the understanding of “transactional sex” in sub-Saharan Africa: A review and synthesis of the literature," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 168(C), pages 186-197.
    10. Carine Le Borgne & E. Kay M. Tisdall, 2017. "Children’s Participation: Questioning Competence and Competencies?," Social Inclusion, Cogitatio Press, vol. 5(3), pages 122-130.
    11. Kristin Anderson Moore & Laura H. Lippman & Hugh McIntosh, 2009. "Positive Indicators of Child Well-being: A conceptual framework, measures and methodological issues," Papers inwopa580, Innocenti Working Papers.
    12. Mark T. Fliegauf, 2016. "In Cyber (Governance) We Trust," Global Policy, London School of Economics and Political Science, vol. 7(1), pages 79-82, February.
    13. Jean-Pascal Bassino & Aurélien Faravelon & Stéphane Grumbach, 2015. "Cross-Border Data Exchanges : The Rise of Platform Economy in Asia," Post-Print hal-01245080, HAL.
    14. Christian Ewert & Céline Kaufmann & Martino Maggetti, 2020. "Linking democratic anchorage and regulatory authority: The case of internet regulators," Regulation & Governance, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 14(2), pages 184-202, April.
    15. Nanni, Riccardo, 2021. "The ‘China’ question in mobile Internet standard-making: Insights from expert interviews," Telecommunications Policy, Elsevier, vol. 45(6).
    16. Manuel Becker, 2019. "When public principals give up control over private agents: The new independence of ICANN in internet governance," Regulation & Governance, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 13(4), pages 561-576, December.
    17. Christopher Whyte, 2018. "Crossing the Digital Divide: Monism, Dualism and the Reason Collective Action is Critical for Cyber Theory Production," Politics and Governance, Cogitatio Press, vol. 6(2), pages 73-82.
    18. Abbott, Kenneth W. & Faude, Benjamin, 2022. "Hybrid institutional complexes in global governance," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 109882, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    child protection; children's rights; governance; internet;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • O33 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Innovation; Research and Development; Technological Change; Intellectual Property Rights - - - Technological Change: Choices and Consequences; Diffusion Processes

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ucf:indipa:indipa795. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Patrizia Faustini (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.