IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/telpol/v45y2021i6s0308596121000550.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The ‘China’ question in mobile Internet standard-making: Insights from expert interviews

Author

Listed:
  • Nanni, Riccardo

Abstract

This article explores the actions of Chinese stakeholders as norm entrepreneurs in mobile Internet standard-making within the 3rd Generation Partnership Project (3GPP). Through semi-structured interviews with key experts from the Internet stakeholder communities, this article contextualises a rapidly transforming and increasingly politicised issue in the broader context of China's engagement with the global multistakeholder Internet governance architecture, as well as the debate on China's rise in the Liberal International Order. Furthermore, it incorporates the views and experiences of technologists working first-hand in standard-making, as they are often disregarded in political-scientific literature. Through the analytical lens of cognitivist regime theory, this article argues that the stronger China and Chinese stakeholders grow economically and politically, the more they become involved in the existing Internet governance regime complex, increasing their influence in the existing institutional arrangements without necessarily acting for changing their norms, rules, and principles. Through these theoretical and methodological approaches, new light is shed on the role of private and public Chinese stakeholders and on the relation between them.

Suggested Citation

  • Nanni, Riccardo, 2021. "The ‘China’ question in mobile Internet standard-making: Insights from expert interviews," Telecommunications Policy, Elsevier, vol. 45(6).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:telpol:v:45:y:2021:i:6:s0308596121000550
    DOI: 10.1016/j.telpol.2021.102151
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0308596121000550
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.telpol.2021.102151?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Frias, Zoraida & Pérez Martínez, Jorge, 2018. "5G networks: Will technology and policy collide?," Telecommunications Policy, Elsevier, vol. 42(8), pages 612-621.
    2. Louise Marie Hurel & Luisa Cruz Lobato, 2018. "Unpacking cyber norms: private companies as norm entrepreneurs," Journal of Cyber Policy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 3(1), pages 61-76, January.
    3. Leonie Maria Tanczer & Irina Brass & Madeline Carr, 2018. "CSIRTs and Global Cybersecurity: How Technical Experts Support Science Diplomacy," Global Policy, London School of Economics and Political Science, vol. 9(S3), pages 60-66, November.
    4. Amitav Acharya & Antoni Estevadeordal & Louis W. Goodman, 2019. "Reshaping Global Order in the 21st Century: G‐Plus Leadership in a Multiplex World," China & World Economy, Institute of World Economics and Politics, Chinese Academy of Social Sciences, vol. 27(5), pages 63-78, September.
    5. Puchala, Donald J. & Hopkins, Raymond F., 1982. "International regimes: lessons from inductive analysis," International Organization, Cambridge University Press, vol. 36(2), pages 245-275, April.
    6. Nye, Joseph S., 2014. "The Regime Complex for Managing Global Cyber Activities," Scholarly Articles 12308565, Harvard Kennedy School of Government.
    7. Giuseppe Gabusi, 2019. "Global Standards in the Asian Infrastructure Investment Bank: The Contribution of the European Members," Global Policy, London School of Economics and Political Science, vol. 10(4), pages 631-638, November.
    8. Belli, Luca, 2015. "A heterostakeholder cooperation for sustainable internet policymaking," Internet Policy Review: Journal on Internet Regulation, Alexander von Humboldt Institute for Internet and Society (HIIG), Berlin, vol. 4(2), pages 1-21.
    9. Young, Oran R., 1982. "Regime dynamics: the rise and fall of international regimes," International Organization, Cambridge University Press, vol. 36(2), pages 277-297, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Radu, Roxana & Kettemann, Matthias C. & Meyer, Trisha & Shahin, Jamal, 2021. "Normfare: Norm entrepreneurship in internet governance," Telecommunications Policy, Elsevier, vol. 45(6).
    2. Cantero Gamito, Marta, 2023. "The influence of China in AI governance through standardisation," Telecommunications Policy, Elsevier, vol. 47(10).
    3. Baron, Justus & Kanevskaia, Olia, 2023. "Wearing multiple hats—The role of working group chairs’ affiliation in standards development," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 52(9).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Levinson, Nanette S., 2021. "Idea entrepreneurs: The United Nations Open-Ended Working Group & cybersecurity," Telecommunications Policy, Elsevier, vol. 45(6).
    2. Vogelsang Ingo, 2018. "Net Neutrality Regulation: Much Ado about Nothing?," Review of Network Economics, De Gruyter, vol. 17(3), pages 225-243, September.
    3. Kenneth W. Abbott & Benjamin Faude, 2022. "Hybrid institutional complexes in global governance," The Review of International Organizations, Springer, vol. 17(2), pages 263-291, April.
    4. Kaya, Ayse & Kilby, Christopher & Kay, Jonathan, 2021. "Asian Infrastructure Investment Bank as an instrument for Chinese influence? Supplementary versus remedial multilateralism," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 145(C).
    5. Maria J. Debre & Hylke Dijkstra, 2023. "Are international organisations in decline? An absolute and relative perspective on institutional change," Global Policy, London School of Economics and Political Science, vol. 14(1), pages 16-30, February.
    6. Ian Johnstone & Joshua Lincoln, 2022. "Global Governance in an Era of Pluralism," Global Policy, London School of Economics and Political Science, vol. 13(4), pages 563-570, September.
    7. Geng Qin & Hanzhi Yu & Chao Wu, 2023. "Global governance for digital sequence information on genetic resources: Demand, progress and reforming paths," Global Policy, London School of Economics and Political Science, vol. 14(2), pages 403-415, May.
    8. Aleksandra Kuzior & Dariusz Krawczyk & Joanna Kubicka & Viera Zozulankova & Krystyna Jedralska & Tetyana Nestorenko, 2024. "Public Perception of the Management of the Implementation of Solutions from the Smart City," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(3), pages 1180-1195.
    9. Heimann, Gadi & Paikowsky, Deganit & Rabinowitz, Or, 2024. "Sneaking through raising walls: The dynamics of institutionalizing security technology clubs," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 77(C).
    10. Alexander S. Korolev & Yulia A. Belous, 2019. "Rethinking The Experience Of Building A Security Community: The Case Of Asean," HSE Working papers WP BRP 33/IR/2019, National Research University Higher School of Economics.
    11. Belli, Luca & Venturini, Jamila, 2016. "Private ordering and the rise of terms of service as cyber-regulation," Internet Policy Review: Journal on Internet Regulation, Alexander von Humboldt Institute for Internet and Society (HIIG), Berlin, vol. 5(4), pages 1-17.
    12. Kris Hartley, 2023. "Public Perceptions About Smart Cities: Governance and Quality-of-Life in Hong Kong," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 166(3), pages 731-753, April.
    13. Mark T. Fliegauf, 2016. "In Cyber (Governance) We Trust," Global Policy, London School of Economics and Political Science, vol. 7(1), pages 79-82, February.
    14. Jaume Benseny & Jarno Lahteenmaki & Juuso Toyli & Heikki Hammainen, 2023. "Urban wireless traffic evolution: the role of new devices and the effect of policy," Papers 2310.14406, arXiv.org.
    15. Shah, Sayed Kifayat & Zhongjun, Tang, 2021. "Elaborating on the consumer’s intention–behavior gap regarding 5G technology: The moderating role of the product market-creation ability," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 66(C).
    16. Jean-Pascal Bassino & Aurélien Faravelon & Stéphane Grumbach, 2015. "Cross-Border Data Exchanges : The Rise of Platform Economy in Asia," Post-Print hal-01245080, HAL.
    17. Christopher Whyte, 2018. "Crossing the Digital Divide: Monism, Dualism and the Reason Collective Action is Critical for Cyber Theory Production," Politics and Governance, Cogitatio Press, vol. 6(2), pages 73-82.
    18. El-Moghazi, Mohamed & Whalley, Jason, 2019. "The International Radio Spectrum Management: A Regime Theory Analysis," 30th European Regional ITS Conference, Helsinki 2019 205176, International Telecommunications Society (ITS).
    19. Hai Yang, 2023. "Rhetorical coercion, institutional legitimacy and the creation of the Asian Infrastructure Investment Bank," Global Policy, London School of Economics and Political Science, vol. 14(5), pages 730-741, November.
    20. Tobias Liebetrau & Linda Monsees, 2023. "Assembling Publics: Microsoft, Cybersecurity, and Public‐Private Relations," Politics and Governance, Cogitatio Press, vol. 11(3), pages 157-167.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:telpol:v:45:y:2021:i:6:s0308596121000550. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/30471/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.