The Norwegian Tax Reform; Distributional Effects and the High-income Response
Are we better or worse off after the Norwegian tax reform of 1992 and how has the reform influenced the income sizes and the distribution of total income? This question denotes our twofold analysis in this paper. We first examine the trends in average income and income distribution in the period from 1991 to 1994. Second, we ask whether the tax reform can explain parts the observed income changes. Calculations from a tax-benefit model, assessing the direct distributional effect by applying post-reform tax rules on pre-reform data, do not predict any substantial increase in income inequality due to the tax reform of 1992. However, we find a significant post-reform increase in observed income inequality, while average income is about unaltered in the period. The increased inequality might be explained by the high income earners' response to large reductions in marginal tax rates. By applying panel data for 1991-1994 and a methodological approach developed by Feldstein (1995a), we find no evidence in support of significant behavioral responses due to decreased marginal tax rates on income. In fact, the overall elasticities are around zero, which differ substantially from Feldstein's estimate of 1.04, based on US-data. Other explanations, as the changes in the taxation of dividends, are discussed.
|Date of creation:||Dec 1997|
|Date of revision:|
|Contact details of provider:|| Postal: P.O.Box 8131 Dep, N-0033 Oslo, Norway|
Phone: (+47) 21 09 00 00
Fax: (+47) 21 09 49 73
Web page: http://www.ssb.no/en/
More information through EDIRC
Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.:
- Nielsen, Soren Bo & Sorensen, Peter Birch, 1997. "On the optimality of the Nordic system of dual income taxation," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 63(3), pages 311-329, February.
- King, Mervyn A., 1983. "Welfare analysis of tax reforms using household data," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 21(2), pages 183-214, July.
- Pencavel, John, 1987. "Labor supply of men: A survey," Handbook of Labor Economics, in: O. Ashenfelter & R. Layard (ed.), Handbook of Labor Economics, edition 1, volume 1, chapter 1, pages 3-102 Elsevier.
- Thomas MaCurdy & David Green & Harry Paarsch, 1990. "Assessing Empirical Approaches for Analyzing Taxes and Labor Supply," Journal of Human Resources, University of Wisconsin Press, vol. 25(3), pages 415-490.
- Thor Olav Thoresen, 1995. "The Distributional Impact of the Norwegian Tax Reform Measured by Disproportionality," Discussion Papers 146, Statistics Norway, Research Department.
- Shorrocks, Anthony F, 1983. "Ranking Income Distributions," Economica, London School of Economics and Political Science, vol. 50(197), pages 3-17, February.
- Morris, Nick & Preston, Ian, 1986. "Inequality, Poverty and the Redistribution of Income," Bulletin of Economic Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 38(4), pages 275-344, November.
- repec:hoo:wpaper:e-90-11 is not listed on IDEAS
- Hans-Werner Sinn, 1990.
"Taxation and the Cost of Capital: The "Old" View, the "New" View and Another View,"
NBER Working Papers
3501, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
- Hans-Werner Sinn, 1991. "Taxation and the Cost of Capital: The "Old" View, the "New" View, and Another View," NBER Chapters, in: Tax Policy and the Economy, Volume 5, pages 25-54 National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
- Martin Feldstein & James M. Poterba, 1996. "Empirical Foundations of Household Taxation," NBER Books, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc, number feld96-1.
When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ssb:dispap:207. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (J Bruusgaard)
If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.