IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/spo/wpmain/infohdl2441-8310.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Redesigning the European Union’s trade policy strategy towards China

Author

Listed:
  • Patrick Messerlin

    (Département d'économie (ECON))

  • Jinghui Wang

    (Groupe d'économie mondiale (GEM))

Abstract

The European Union’s recent trade policy strategy towards China, which focuses on bilateral market access and involves a strong U S-style confrontational stance, is ineffective and short-sighted. Today there exists no genuine dialogue between China and the EU on crucial commercial issues. This paper calls for foresightedness in the European Union’s policies towards China. It reviews the EU’s strategy and proposes concrete policy options that will allow it to more effectively promote its commercial interests in China, by focusing on topics that will draw support from Chinese interests and bring greater economic benefits for both parties. In trade in goods, the paper proposes a “small bargain”, involving the granting of market economy status to China in antidumping, in exchange for China’s improvement of its WTO tariff schedule implementation. In its “behind-the-border” rules agenda, the proposed EU-China Partnership and Cooperation Agreement could develop a truly “grand bargain” involving a strong reduction of China’s highest barriers on inward FDI in services, better access by China to the EU’s services markets, joint procedures to address China’s Sovereign Wealth Funds’ and EU’s norms and standards. It would also involve an important scaling down of Europe’s requests in issues such as intellectual property rights. More broadly, the EU should review its current trade policy strategy based on bilateral deals and re-focus its trade policy on the WTO. The paper finally argues that EU should also adopt a truly global approach in its trade policy towards China. This means involving not only the United States and Japan, but also successful medium-sized industrial and emerging economies.

Suggested Citation

  • Patrick Messerlin & Jinghui Wang, 2008. "Redesigning the European Union’s trade policy strategy towards China," Sciences Po publications 04/2008, Sciences Po.
  • Handle: RePEc:spo:wpmain:info:hdl:2441/8310
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://spire.sciencespo.fr/hdl:/2441/8310/resources/messerlin-wang-euchina-long-en20022008.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Takeshi Koyama & Stephen S. Golub, 2006. "OECD's FDI Regulatory Restrictiveness Index: Revision and Extension to more Economies," OECD Working Papers on International Investment 2006/4, OECD Publishing.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ingo Borchert & Batshur Gootiiz & Aaditya Mattoo, 2014. "Policy Barriers to International Trade in Services: Evidence from a New Database," The World Bank Economic Review, World Bank, vol. 28(1), pages 162-188.
    2. Adewale Samuel Hassan, 2022. "Does Country Risk Influence Foreign Direct Investment Inflows? A Case of the Visegrád Four," Economies, MDPI, vol. 10(9), pages 1-22, September.
    3. Karingi, Stephen N. & Leyaro, Vincent, 2010. "Surmounting Africa's Trade Capacity Contraints: An Assessment of the Effectiveness of the Aid for Trade," Conference papers 331966, Purdue University, Center for Global Trade Analysis, Global Trade Analysis Project.
    4. Eric Rugraff, 2010. "Foreign Direct Investment (FDI) and Supplier-Oriented Upgrading in the Czech Motor Vehicle Industry," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 44(5), pages 627-638.
    5. repec:spo:wpecon:info:hdl:2441/8310 is not listed on IDEAS
    6. Lewis Davis & Claudia R. Williamson, 2018. "Open Borders for Business? Causes and Consequences of the Regulation of Foreign Entry," Southern Economic Journal, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 85(2), pages 508-536, October.
    7. Przemyslaw Kowalski, 2008. "China and India: A Tale of Two Trade Integration Approaches," Working Papers id:1637, eSocialSciences.
    8. Fernando Mistura & Caroline Roulet, 2019. "The determinants of Foreign Direct Investment: Do statutory restrictions matter?," OECD Working Papers on International Investment 2019/01, OECD Publishing.
    9. Ingo Borchert & Batshur Gootiiz & Arti Grover Goswami & Aaditya Mattoo, 2017. "Services Trade Protection and Economic Isolation," The World Economy, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 40(3), pages 632-652, March.
    10. Thomas Hutzschenreuter & Arie Y. Lewin & Stephan Dresel, 2011. "Time to Success in Offshoring Business Processes," Management International Review, Springer, vol. 51(1), pages 65-92, February.
    11. repec:hal:wpspec:info:hdl:2441/8310 is not listed on IDEAS
    12. Carolina Lennon, 2008. "Trade in services: Cross-border trade vs commercial presence. Evidence of complementarity," Working Papers halshs-00586217, HAL.
    13. Shandre Mugan Thangavelu & Lili Yan Ing & Shujiro Urata, . "Services Productivity and Trade Openness: Case of ASEAN," Chapters, in: Lili Yan Ing (ed.), East Asian Integration (First Edition), chapter 7, pages 195-222, Economic Research Institute for ASEAN and East Asia (ERIA).
    14. Ayse Kaya & James T. Walker, 2009. "Individual Attitudes towards the Impact of Multinational Enterprises on Local Businesses," Economics Discussion Papers em-dp2009-02, Department of Economics, University of Reading.
    15. World Bank, "undated". "World Bank East Asia and Pacific Economic Update, April 2014 : Preserving Stability and Promoting Growth," World Bank Publications - Reports 18378, The World Bank Group.
    16. Philippe Askenazy & Gilbert Cette & Paul Maarek, 2018. "Rent‐Sharing and Workers' Bargaining Power: An Empirical Cross‐Country/ Cross‐Industry Panel Analysis," Scandinavian Journal of Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 120(2), pages 563-596, April.
    17. Sebastian Barnes & Romain Bouis & Philippe Briard & Sean Dougherty & Mehmet Eris, 2013. "The GDP Impact of Reform: A Simple Simulation Framework," OECD Economics Department Working Papers 834, OECD Publishing.
    18. Judith Clifton & Daniel Díaz-Fuentes, 2011. "The European Union, Southern Multinationals and the Question of the ‘Strategic Industries’," Palgrave Macmillan Books, in: Louis Brennan (ed.), The Emergence of Southern Multinationals, chapter 12, pages 226-241, Palgrave Macmillan.
    19. Ogbeifun Lawrence & Shobande Olatunji Abdul, 2020. "Causality Analysis of Disaggregated FDI Inflows on Sectorial Growth in OECD Area," Studia Universitatis „Vasile Goldis” Arad – Economics Series, Sciendo, vol. 30(4), pages 92-110, December.
    20. Alexandra Bykova & Richard Grieveson & Julia Grübler & Magdolna Sass & Tamás Szemlér, 2021. "Monthly Report No. 2/2021," wiiw Monthly Reports 2021-02, The Vienna Institute for International Economic Studies, wiiw.
    21. Benoît Coeuré, 2008. "Vivre avec les fonds souverains," Revue d'Économie Financière, Programme National Persée, vol. 7(1), pages 155-163.
    22. Judith Clifton & Daniel Díaz-Fuentes, 2010. "Is the European Union Ready for Foreign Direct Investment from Emerging Markets?," Palgrave Macmillan Books, in: Karl P. Sauvant & Geraldine McAllister & Wolfgang A. Maschek (ed.), Foreign Direct Investments from Emerging Markets, chapter 0, pages 335-358, Palgrave Macmillan.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spo:wpmain:info:hdl:2441/8310. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Spire @ Sciences Po Library (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ecspofr.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.