IDEAS home Printed from
MyIDEAS: Log in (now much improved!) to save this paper

Learning and Stock Market Volatility

Listed author(s):
  • Klaus Adam


    (Research Department CEPR and European Central Bank)

  • Albert Marcet
  • Juan Pablo Nicolini

Introducing learning into a standard asset pricing model improves considerably its empirical performance. In a model of learning where today's stock price is determined by the expectation of tomorrow's stock price, the dynamics of expectations and actual price are such that the market has inertia. If the market has been increasing it will have a tendency to increase further, thereby generating large and persistent deviations of asset prices from fundamental values. For overvalued asset prices the model predicts the possibility of sudden and strong price decreases, i.e., 'stock market crashes', but no symmetric stock market increases in the presence of undervalued asset prices. These features emerge even though the deviations of agents' price expectations from perfectly rational return forecasts would be hard to detect given available sample sizes. Using a calibrated asset pricing model with habit persistence and learning, we can match the following quarterly U.S. asset pricing facts: the mean and volatility of stock returns; the mean, volatility, and autocorrelation of the price dividend ratio; and the average bond returns (equity premium). Consistent with empirical studies, the learning model also predicts that the price dividend ratio has predictive power for stock returns over the medium term (but not the short-term) and is unrelated to future fundamentals. The same model under rational expectations generates insufficient volatility and auto-correlation of the price dividend ratio and implies that the price dividend ratio is unrelated to future stock returns. The learning and rational expectations models both predict too much volatility of the short-term real interest rate, although the learning model performs somewhat better on this account.

To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
1. Check below under "Related research" whether another version of this item is available online.
2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

Paper provided by Society for Computational Economics in its series Computing in Economics and Finance 2006 with number 15.

in new window

Date of creation: 04 Jul 2006
Handle: RePEc:sce:scecfa:15
Contact details of provider: Web page:

More information through EDIRC

No references listed on IDEAS
You can help add them by filling out this form.

This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sce:scecfa:15. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Christopher F. Baum)

If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis using RePEc data.