IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/
MyIDEAS: Login to save this paper or follow this series

Zur Kritik des BIP als Indikator für Wohlstand und Wirtschaftswachstum

  • Ulrich van Suntum
Registered author(s):

    Die vorliegende Studie befasst sich mit der Kritik an weiterem Wirtschaftswachstum zum einen und mit der Kritik am Bruttoinlandsprodukt als Wohlstandsindikator zum anderen. Anlass ist die Einsetzung der Enquetekommission „Wachstum, Wohlstand, Lebensqualität“ durch die Bundesregierung, welche alternative Wohlstandsindikatoren bzw. entsprechende Ergänzungen zum BIP prüfen soll. Dazu sollen hier Anregungen vor allem aus Sicht der ökonomischen Theorie gegeben werden. Während es nämlich keinen Mangel an konkreten Vorschlägen für alternative Wohlstandsindikatoren gibt, ist ihre theoretische Konsistenz bisher selten thematisiert worden. So ist es keineswegs selbstverständlich, dass man den Wert des BIP etwa um die Kosten des Umwelt- und Ressourcenverbrauchs bereinigen kann, ohne dabei in logische Widersprüche zu geraten. Zudem zeigt sich bei näherer Analyse, dass das BIP sehr viel mehr wohlfahrtsrelevante Informationen enthält, als auf den ersten Blick erkennbar ist.

    If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.

    File URL: http://www.ratswd.de/download/RatSWD_WP_2012/RatSWD_WP_208.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    Paper provided by German Council for Social and Economic Data (RatSWD) in its series Working Paper Series of the German Council for Social and Economic Data with number 208.

    as
    in new window

    Length: 68
    Date of creation: 2012
    Date of revision:
    Handle: RePEc:rsw:rswwps:rswwps208
    Contact details of provider: Web page: http://www.ratswd.de/eng/index.html
    Email:


    More information through EDIRC

    References listed on IDEAS
    Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.:

    as in new window
    1. Barrotta, Pierluigi, 2008. "Why Economists Should Be Unhappy With The Economics Of Happiness," Economics and Philosophy, Cambridge University Press, vol. 24(02), pages 145-165, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

    When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:rsw:rswwps:rswwps208. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (RatSWD)

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

    If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis using RePEc data.