IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/rff/dpaper/dp-05-47.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Macroeconomics and Forest Sustainability in the Developing World

Author

Listed:
  • Sedjo, Roger

    (Resources for the Future)

Abstract

Governments often use fiscal, exchange rate, monetary policy as well as export promotion tax increases, privatization, and land reform as part of comprehensive adjustments packages for addressing economic imbalances, balance of payments, and structural weaknesses. Such approaches, however, have come under heavy criticism for failing to recognize the social and environmental costs associated with them. Critics have argued that economic growth, trade liberalization, and increased primary product exports increase pressure on many sectors, including the agricultural and forestry land use sectors. This paper examines a number of these types of external shocks. This paper makes two arguments. First, from a theoretical economic perspective, although in many cases structural adjustment programs can be expected to affect the domestic forest sector, in other cases they will not. Second, even when there is an impact on the forest, it need not be detrimental to environmental and ecosystem values. A sustainable forest system needs to provide wood, local environmental products and services, and global ecological services, but individual forests can specialize in some of these.

Suggested Citation

  • Sedjo, Roger, 2005. "Macroeconomics and Forest Sustainability in the Developing World," RFF Working Paper Series dp-05-47, Resources for the Future.
  • Handle: RePEc:rff:dpaper:dp-05-47
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.rff.org/RFF/documents/RFF-DP-05-47.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Keynes, John Maynard, 1919. "The Economic Consequences of the Peace," History of Economic Thought Books, McMaster University Archive for the History of Economic Thought, number keynes1919.
    2. Sedjo, Roger A. & Simpson, R. David, 1999. "Tariff Liberalization, Wood Trade Flows, and Global Forests," Discussion Papers 10557, Resources for the Future.
    3. World Commission on Environment and Development,, 1987. "Our Common Future," OUP Catalogue, Oxford University Press, number 9780192820808.
    4. Grossman, G.M & Krueger, A.B., 1991. "Environmental Impacts of a North American Free Trade Agreement," Papers 158, Princeton, Woodrow Wilson School - Public and International Affairs.
    5. William Easterly, 2001. "The Effect of IMF and World Bank Programmes on Poverty," WIDER Working Paper Series DP2001-102, World Institute for Development Economic Research (UNU-WIDER).
    6. Sedjo, Roger & Simpson, R. David, 1999. "Tariff Liberalization, Wood Trade Flows, and Global Forests," RFF Working Paper Series dp-00-05, Resources for the Future.
    7. Edward B. Barbier, 1999. "The Effects of the Urugauy Round Tariff Reductions on the Forest Product Trade: A Partial Equilbrium Analysis," The World Economy, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 22(1), pages 87-115, January.
    8. Pandey, Kiran D. & Wheeler, David, 2001. "Structural adjustment and forest resources - the impact of World Bank operations," Policy Research Working Paper Series 2584, The World Bank.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Victor N. Cheo, 2011. "Criteria and indicators of forest sustainability assessment for Cameroon," Environment Systems and Decisions, Springer, vol. 31(3), pages 299-307, September.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Sedjo, Roger A., 2005. "Macroeconomics and Forest Sustainability in the Developing World," Discussion Papers 10458, Resources for the Future.
    2. Anjum, Zeba & Burke, Paul J. & Gerlagh, Reyer & Stern, David I., "undated". "Modeling the Emissions-Income Relationship Using Long-Run Growth Rates," Working Papers 249422, Australian National University, Centre for Climate Economics & Policy.
    3. C. Seri & A. de Juan Fernandez, 2021. "The relationship between economic growth and environment. Testing the EKC hypothesis for Latin American countries," Papers 2105.11405, arXiv.org.
    4. Elvis Dze Achuo & Tii N. Nchofoung & Simplice A. Asongu & Gildas Dohba Dinga, 2021. "Unravelling the Mysteries of Underdevelopment in Africa," Research Africa Network Working Papers 21/073, Research Africa Network (RAN).
    5. Oktay KIZILKAYA, 2017. "The Impact of Economic Growth and Foreign Direct Investment on CO2 Emissions: The Case of Turkey," Turkish Economic Review, KSP Journals, vol. 4(1), pages 106-118, March.
    6. David I. Stern, 2017. "The environmental Kuznets curve after 25 years," Journal of Bioeconomics, Springer, vol. 19(1), pages 7-28, April.
    7. Manel Kamoun & Ines Abdelkafi & Abdelfetah Ghorbel, 2019. "The Impact of Renewable Energy on Sustainable Growth: Evidence from a Panel of OECD Countries," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 10(1), pages 221-237, March.
    8. Stern, David I., 2014. "The Environmental Kuznets Curve: A Primer," Working Papers 249424, Australian National University, Centre for Climate Economics & Policy.
    9. Adhy Satya Pratama & M. Pudjihardjo & Asfi Manzilati & Devanto Shasta Pratomo, 2021. "Testing the Existence of Environmental Kuznets Curve (EKC) Hypothesis in ASEAN 5," Technium Social Sciences Journal, Technium Science, vol. 22(1), pages 362-375, August.
    10. Cantos, José Mª & Balsalobre Lorente, Daniel, 2011. "Las energías renovables en la Curva de Kuznets Ambiental: Una aplicación para España/Renewable Energy in the Environmental Kuznets Curve: An Application to Spain," Estudios de Economia Aplicada, Estudios de Economia Aplicada, vol. 29, pages 667(32.)-66, Agosto.
    11. Teixidó-Figueras, Jordi & Duro, Juan Antonio, 2015. "The building blocks of International Ecological Footprint inequality: A Regression-Based Decomposition," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 118(C), pages 30-39.
    12. Eriko Miyama & Shunsuke Managi, 2014. "Global environmental emissions estimate: application of multiple imputation," Environmental Economics and Policy Studies, Springer;Society for Environmental Economics and Policy Studies - SEEPS, vol. 16(2), pages 115-135, April.
    13. Thomas P. Narins, 2015. "Dynamics of the Russia–China Forest Products Trade," Growth and Change, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 46(4), pages 688-703, December.
    14. Therese Bennich & Salim Belyazid, 2017. "The Route to Sustainability—Prospects and Challenges of the Bio-Based Economy," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(6), pages 1-18, May.
    15. Alexandra-Anca Purcel, 2020. "New insights into the environmental Kuznets curve hypothesis in developing and transition economies: a literature survey," Environmental Economics and Policy Studies, Springer;Society for Environmental Economics and Policy Studies - SEEPS, vol. 22(4), pages 585-631, October.
    16. Helen Kopnina, 2014. "Consumption, waste and (un)sustainable development: reflections on the Dutch holiday of Queen’s day," Environment Systems and Decisions, Springer, vol. 34(2), pages 312-322, June.
    17. Sconfienza, Umberto Mario, 2021. "The "new" environmental narratives and the resurgence of old debates," Global Cooperation Research Papers 27, University of Duisburg-Essen, Käte Hamburger Kolleg / Centre for Global Cooperation Research (KHK/GCR21).
    18. Eric Berr, 2006. "Keynes and the Post Keynesians on Sustainable Development," Post-Print hal-00388849, HAL.
    19. Leal, Patrícia Hipólito & Marques, António Cardoso, 2020. "Rediscovering the EKC hypothesis for the 20 highest CO2 emitters among OECD countries by level of globalization," International Economics, Elsevier, vol. 164(C), pages 36-47.
    20. William D. Nordhaus, 1992. "Lethal Model 2: The Limits to Growth Revisited," Brookings Papers on Economic Activity, Economic Studies Program, The Brookings Institution, vol. 23(2), pages 1-60.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    forests; sustainability; macroeconomics; trade; exchange rates; structural adjustment;
    All these keywords.

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:rff:dpaper:dp-05-47. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Resources for the Future (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/rffffus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.