IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/qed/wpaper/664.html

Who are the Volunteers in the Battle Against Budget Deficits?

Author

Listed:
  • Martin Prachowny

Abstract

Individuals differ in the net benefit they receive from governments depending on their tastes for public goods, the taxes they pay, and government demand for goods produced by specific factors they own. It is argued that deficit reduction will be decided on the basis of special economic interests rather than macroeconomic issues. Using the 1977 U.S. input-output table, each of 85 industries are identified as a potential net gainer or loser in the wake of an assumed 10% reduction in federal government expenditures on goods and services. The military hardware industry is the largest loser; the new construction industry the largest gainer. Workers are assumed to have some attachment to their industry and vote for or against deficit reduction based on their self-interest. The median voter experiences a net loss, and losses are more concentrated than gains.

Suggested Citation

  • Martin Prachowny, 1986. "Who are the Volunteers in the Battle Against Budget Deficits?," Working Paper 664, Economics Department, Queen's University.
  • Handle: RePEc:qed:wpaper:664
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a
    for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    Other versions of this item:

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:qed:wpaper:664. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Mark Babcock (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/qedquca.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.