IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/pri/indrel/297.html

A Comparative Analysis of Unemployment in Canada and the United States

Author

Listed:
  • David Card

    (Princeton University)

  • W. Craig Riddell

    (University of British Columbia)

Abstract

Throughout the late 1980s unemployment rates remained 2-3 percentage points higher in Canada than the U.S. We use individual microdata from the U.S. Current Population Survey and the Canadian Survey of Consumer Finances to study the emerging unemployment gap between the two countries. For women, we find that the relative rise in Canadian unemployment occurred with relative increases in per capita weeks of work. The unemployment gap for Canadian women was driven by a rise in the probability that nonworkers are classified as "unemployed" as opposed to "out of the labor force". For men, the increase in unemployment was accompanied by a relative decrease in Canadian employment rates, and an increase in the probability that men with no weeks of work are classified as "in the labor force". A comparison of annual work patterns and income recipiency in the two countries suggests that Canadians of both sexes have increasingly adjusted their labor supply to the parameters of the Canadian Unemployment Insurance system.

Suggested Citation

  • David Card & W. Craig Riddell, 1992. "A Comparative Analysis of Unemployment in Canada and the United States," Working Papers 677, Princeton University, Department of Economics, Industrial Relations Section..
    • Handle: RePEc:pri:indrel:297
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://dataspace.princeton.edu/bitstream/88435/dsp013b5918572/2/297.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Other versions of this item:

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    JEL classification:

    • C39 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Multiple or Simultaneous Equation Models; Multiple Variables - - - Other
    • C4 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Econometric and Statistical Methods: Special Topics

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:pri:indrel:297. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Bobray Bordelon (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/irprius.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.