IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/pra/mprapa/92099.html

Contemporary Criticism of Corporate Behaviour

Author

Listed:
  • Rosca, Paula-Carmen

Abstract

Nowadays, corporations play an important role in the economic, social and political life. During the last century, they contributed to the economic and technological development of our world. We may say that this evolution led to a better wellbeing, which means more wealth, more speed, more options, more freedom and spare time. They have brought mankind, things without which we couldn’t imagine our existence: planes, communication means, computers, pharmaceutical products etc. But at what price? And who is going to pay it? Over the last decades, people and organizations were getting worried about the negative impact that corporations might have on their lives (and the next generations’ live) from an economic, social and environmental perspective. This paper is focused on corporate dominance and its aim is to bring into light the main critics of corporate behaviour classified according to different criteria.

Suggested Citation

  • Rosca, Paula-Carmen, 2018. "Contemporary Criticism of Corporate Behaviour," MPRA Paper 92099, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    • Handle: RePEc:pra:mprapa:92099
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/92099/1/MPRA_paper_92099.pdf
    File Function: original version
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Alina Badulescu & Daniel Badulescu & Tomina Saveanu & Roxana Hatos, 2018. "The Relationship between Firm Size and Age, and Its Social Responsibility Actions—Focus on a Developing Country (Romania)," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(3), pages 1-21, March.
    2. David Korten, 2006. "From Empire to Earth Community," Development, Palgrave Macmillan;Society for International Deveopment, vol. 49(3), pages 76-81, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Tomina Saveanu & Daniel Badulescu & Sorana Saveanu & Maria-Madela Abrudan & Alina Badulescu, 2021. "The Role of Owner-Managers in Shaping CSR Activity of Romanian SMEs," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(20), pages 1-19, October.
    2. Reshma Shrestha & Jaap Zevenbergen & Fahria Masum & Mahesh Banskota, 2018. "“Action Space” Based Urban Land Governance Pattern: Implication in Managing Informal Settlements from the Perspective of Low-Income Housing," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(7), pages 1-19, June.
    3. M.A. Gulzar & Jacob Cherian & Muhammad Safdar Sial & Alina Badulescu & Phung Anh Thu & Daniel Badulescu & Nguyen Vinh Khuong, 2018. "Does Corporate Social Responsibility Influence Corporate Tax Avoidance of Chinese Listed Companies?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(12), pages 1-12, December.
    4. Laura Broccardo & Elisa Truant & Lèo‐Paul Dana, 2023. "The sustainability orientation in the wine industry: An analysis based on age as a driver," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 30(3), pages 1300-1313, May.
    5. Khan, Naveed R. & Ameer, Farah & Bouncken, Ricarda B. & Covin, Jeffrey G., 2023. "Corporate sustainability entrepreneurship: The role of green entrepreneurial orientation and organizational resilience capacity for green innovation," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 169(C).
    6. Dolores Gallardo-Vázquez & Luis Enrique Valdez-Juárez & Ángela María Castuera-Díaz, 2019. "Corporate Social Responsibility as an Antecedent of Innovation, Reputation, Performance, and Competitive Success: A Multiple Mediation Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(20), pages 1-28, October.
    7. Naima Lassoued & Imen Khanchel, 2023. "Voluntary CSR disclosure and CEO narcissism: the moderating role of CEO duality and board gender diversity," Review of Managerial Science, Springer, vol. 17(3), pages 1075-1123, April.
    8. Stefania-Rodica Hubel (Anghel) & Mari-Isabella Stan & Tanase Tasente, 2023. "Assessing the Role of Gender in Shaping Perceptions of Socio- Economic Issues in the Context of Sustainable Local Development: A Study on Respondents' Influence," Technium Sustainability, Technium Science, vol. 3(1), pages 76-90, June.
    9. Simona Činčalová & Veronika Hedija, 2020. "Firm Characteristics and Corporate Social Responsibility: The Case of Czech Transportation and Storage Industry," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(5), pages 1-15, March.
    10. Alina Iuliana Tăbîrcă & Oana Raluca Ivan, 2020. "Relationship between Corporate Social Responsibility and Entrepreneurship - Evidence from Romanian Entrepreneurs," Book chapters-LUMEN Proceedings, in: Marcin Waldemar STANIEWSKI & Valentina VASILE & Adriana Grigorescu (ed.), International Conference Innovative Business Management & Global Entrepreneurship (IBMAGE 2020), edition 1, volume 14, chapter 44, pages 611-626, Editura Lumen.
    11. Carmen SCORȚE & Daniela ZĂPODEANU & Luminița RUS, 2021. "Reflection Of The Pandemic Crisis Effects In The Financial Reports. An Outlook On Horeca Industry," Annales Universitatis Apulensis Series Oeconomica, Faculty of Sciences, "1 Decembrie 1918" University, Alba Iulia, vol. 2(23), pages 1-7.
    12. Mariana Hatmanu & Christiana Brigitte Sandu & Elisabeta Jaba, 2019. "A Comparative Study on Drivers for Corporate Environmental Responsibility, EU15 vs. EU-NMS13," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(22), pages 1-27, November.
    13. Timothy W. Sipe, 2020. "The Light on Hartman Green: Natural Scientists, Business Education, and an Ecological Business Paradigm," Humanistic Management Journal, Springer, vol. 5(2), pages 279-286, December.
    14. Perkins, Patricia E. (Ellie), 2019. "Climate justice, commons, and degrowth," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 160(C), pages 183-190.
    15. Gizem ARAS BEGER, 2024. "How Competing Institutional Logics Affect Corporate Social Responsibility Benefits: the Mediating Role of Paradox Mindset and Multi-Stakeholders," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 15(1), pages 1913-1951, March.
    16. Xiaofang Chen & P.R. Weerathunga & Mohammad Nurunnabi & K.M.M.C.B. Kulathunga & W.H.M.S. Samarathunga, 2020. "Influences of Behavioral Intention to Engage in Environmental Accounting Practices for Corporate Sustainability: Managerial Perspectives from a Developing Country," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(13), pages 1-30, June.
    17. Camelia-Daniela Hategan & Nicoleta Sirghi & Ruxandra-Ioana Curea-Pitorac & Vasile-Petru Hategan, 2018. "Doing Well or Doing Good: The Relationship between Corporate Social Responsibility and Profit in Romanian Companies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(4), pages 1-23, April.
    18. Bernard Amadei, 2021. "Systemic Modeling of the Peace–Development Nexus," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(5), pages 1-21, February.
    19. Maoliang Bu & Ying Liu, 2022. "Multinational Enterprises’ Dual Agency Role: Formal Institutions and Corporate Social Responsibility in Emerging Markets," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(4), pages 1-22, February.
    20. Casiana-Teodora Ille, 2022. "Does Size Matter In Organizing Corporate Social Responsibility (Csr) In Romanian Firms?," Oradea Journal of Business and Economics, University of Oradea, Faculty of Economics, vol. 7(2), pages 87-95, Septembri.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    JEL classification:

    • G34 - Financial Economics - - Corporate Finance and Governance - - - Mergers; Acquisitions; Restructuring; Corporate Governance
    • L2 - Industrial Organization - - Firm Objectives, Organization, and Behavior
    • M14 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Business Administration - - - Corporate Culture; Diversity; Social Responsibility

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:pra:mprapa:92099. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Joachim Winter (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/vfmunde.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.