IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/pra/mprapa/81878.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Effect of Welfare and Economic Performance on Good Governance Outcomes in Pakistan

Author

Listed:
  • Mamoon, Dawood

Abstract

The paper undertakes a detailed analysis of economic progress and welfare measures in determining good governance outcomes in Pakistan. There is evidence that inequality stifles the capacity of political, economic and social governance by creating an elite class that protect their economic and political interests and undertake legislation primarily to the benefit of ruling elites. Furthermore our results also suggest that economic development empower the economically and socially excluded groups of the society and give them more voice in favor of policies that are representative of the issues like accountability against corruption or favoritism.

Suggested Citation

  • Mamoon, Dawood, 2017. "Effect of Welfare and Economic Performance on Good Governance Outcomes in Pakistan," MPRA Paper 81878, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    • Handle: RePEc:pra:mprapa:81878
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/81878/1/MPRA_paper_81878.pdf
    File Function: original version
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Other versions of this item:

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Rashida Haq & Uzma Zia, 2009. "Does Governance Contribute to Pro-poor Growth? Evidence from Pakistan," Governance Working Papers 22980, East Asian Bureau of Economic Research.
    2. Arshed H. Bhatti, 2001. "Growth and Poverty in Pakistan: Implications for Governance," The Pakistan Development Review, Pakistan Institute of Development Economics, vol. 40(4), pages 831-844.
    3. Bichaka Fayissa & Christian Nsiah, 2010. "The Impact of Governance on Economic Growth: Further Evidence for Africa," Working Papers 201012, Middle Tennessee State University, Department of Economics and Finance.
    4. Jalilian, Hossein & Kirkpatrick, Colin & Parker, David, 2007. "The Impact of Regulation on Economic Growth in Developing Countries: A Cross-Country Analysis," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 35(1), pages 87-103, January.
    5. Mushtaq H. Khan, 2009. "Governance, Growth and Poverty Reduction," Working Papers 75, United Nations, Department of Economics and Social Affairs.
    6. Rashida Haq & Uzma Zia, 2006. "Governance and Pro-poor Growth: Evidence from Pakistan," The Pakistan Development Review, Pakistan Institute of Development Economics, vol. 45(4), pages 761-776.
    7. Biman Chand Prasad, 2008. "Institutions, good governance and economic growth in the Pacific Island countries," International Journal of Social Economics, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 35(12), pages 904-918, October.
    8. Dethier, Jean-Jacques, 1999. "Governance and Economic Performance: A Survey," Discussion Papers 279846, University of Bonn, Center for Development Research (ZEF).
    9. Torres, Magui Moreno & Anderson, Michael, 2004. "Fragile States: Defining Difficult Environments For Poverty Reduction," PRDE Working Papers 12822, Department for International Development (DFID) (UK).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Rabia Nazir & Mumtaz Anwar, 2013. "Growth Governance Nexus: A Case of Pakistan," Journal of Economics and Behavioral Studies, AMH International, vol. 5(8), pages 562-572.
    2. Danish Ahmed Siddiqui & Qazi Masood Ahmed, 2019. "The Causal Relationship Between Institutions and Economic Growth: An Empirical Investigation for Pakistan Economy," Issues in Economics and Business, Macrothink Institute, vol. 5(1), pages 1-19, June.
    3. Lawrence Sáez, 2013. "Methods in governance research: a review of research approaches," Global Development Institute Working Paper Series esid-017-13, GDI, The University of Manchester.
    4. Johan Willner, 2003. "Privatisation and Public Ownership in Finland," CESifo Working Paper Series 1012, CESifo.
    5. Imam, M. & Jamasb, T. & Llorca, M. & Llorca, M., 2018. "Power Sector Reform and Corruption: Evidence from Electricity Industry in Sub-Saharan Africa," Cambridge Working Papers in Economics 1801, Faculty of Economics, University of Cambridge.
    6. Martinez-Vazquez, Jorge & McNab, Robert M., 2003. "Fiscal Decentralization and Economic Growth," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 31(9), pages 1597-1616, September.
    7. Sudip Ranjan Basu, 2005. "Does Governance Matter?Some Evidence from Indian States," Development and Comp Systems 0509008, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    8. Matthias Finger & Rolf W. Künneke (ed.), 2011. "International Handbook of Network Industries," Books, Edward Elgar Publishing, number 12961.
    9. Ghassan Baliki & Tilman Brück & Neil T. N. Ferguson & Sindu Workneh Kebede, 2022. "Fragility exposure index: Concepts, measurement, and application," Review of Development Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 26(2), pages 639-660, May.
    10. G. Olanrewaju & S. Tella & B. Adesoye, 2019. "Institutional Quality, Financial Inclusion and Inclusive Growth: Causality Evidence from Nigeria," Economic and Financial Review, Central Bank of Nigeria, vol. 57(3), September.
    11. Slavica Penev & Andreaj Marusic, 2012. "Importance of the EU Integration Process for the Improvement of Legal Environment in Western Balkan Countries," Book Chapters, in: Paulino Teixeira & António Portugal Duarte & Srdjan Redzepagic & Dejan Eric (ed.), European Integration Process in Western Balkan Countries, edition 1, volume 1, chapter 27, pages 529-544, Institute of Economic Sciences.
    12. Carment, David & Samy, Yiagadeeesen & Prest, Stewart, 2009. "Approaches to Country Risk Analysis and Early Warning," Economia Internazionale / International Economics, Camera di Commercio Industria Artigianato Agricoltura di Genova, vol. 62(3), pages 297-323.
    13. Drago, Carlo & Gatto, Andrea, 2022. "Policy, regulation effectiveness, and sustainability in the energy sector: A worldwide interval-based composite indicator," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 167(C).
    14. Tamilina, Larysa & Tamilina, Natalya, 2014. "The impact of formal institutions on social trust formation: A social-cognitive approach," MPRA Paper 63203, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    15. Iheonu, Chimere & Asongu, Simplice & Odo, Kingsley & Ojiem, Patrick, 2020. "Financial Sector Development and Investment in Selected ECOWAS Countries: Empirical Evidence using Heterogeneous Panel Data Method," MPRA Paper 107102, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    16. Thanh Hung Pham & Thi Thanh Hang Hoang & Eleftherios I. Thalassinos & Hoang Anh Le, 2022. "The Impact of Quality of Public Administration on Local Economic Growth in Vietnam," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 15(4), pages 1-13, March.
    17. Sajjad Ahmad & Muqarrab Akbar, 2019. "A Historical Review of Governance in Pakistan (1947-2012)," Global Regional Review, Humanity Only, vol. 4(1), pages 320-325, March.
    18. Rafiou Raphaël Bétila, 2021. "The impact of Ease of Doing Business on economic growth: a dynamic panel analysis for African countries," SN Business & Economics, Springer, vol. 1(10), pages 1-34, October.
    19. Muhammad Shahid Hassan & Samra Bukhari & Noman Arshed, 2020. "Competitiveness, governance and globalization: What matters for poverty alleviation?," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 22(4), pages 3491-3518, April.
    20. Carlos Abreo & Ricardo Bustillo & Carlos Rodriguez, 2021. "The role of institutional quality in the international trade of a Latin American country: evidence from Colombian export performance," Journal of Economic Structures, Springer;Pan-Pacific Association of Input-Output Studies (PAPAIOS), vol. 10(1), pages 1-21, December.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Governance; Welfare; Economic Development;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • E6 - Macroeconomics and Monetary Economics - - Macroeconomic Policy, Macroeconomic Aspects of Public Finance, and General Outlook
    • E61 - Macroeconomics and Monetary Economics - - Macroeconomic Policy, Macroeconomic Aspects of Public Finance, and General Outlook - - - Policy Objectives; Policy Designs and Consistency; Policy Coordination
    • P1 - Political Economy and Comparative Economic Systems - - Capitalist Economies
    • P11 - Political Economy and Comparative Economic Systems - - Capitalist Economies - - - Planning, Coordination, and Reform

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:pra:mprapa:81878. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Joachim Winter (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/vfmunde.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.