IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/pra/mprapa/81534.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Antimonopolska politika: predlog rešenja
[Competition policy: A suggestion]

Author

Listed:
  • Begović, Boris
  • Bukvić, Rajko

Abstract

Serbian. U radu se na osnovu analize postojećeg antimonopolskog zakonodavstva u našoj zemlji i ukazivanja na njegovu neadekvatnost daju osnovne sugestije i smernice za izradu novog zakonodavstva, kao osnove za delotvornu politiku razvoja i zaštite konkurencije. lstaknuti su osnovni problemi koje novo zakonodavstvo mora da obuhvati: stvaranje tržišne moći, odnosno monopola i drugih nesavršenih tržišnih struktura, procenjivanje efekata horizontalnih i vertikalnih integracija na postojeće rržišne strukture, formiranje adekvatnog antimonopolskog tela, s jasno definisanim nadležnostima i načinom rada, kriterijumima i procedurama za odlučivanje, sa strogo utvrđenim sastavom tela i mandatom njegovih članova, i uz striktno poštovanje načela javnosti njegovog rada. Naravno, pri tome je nužno izbeći mogućnost koju sadašnje zakonodavstvo daje, naime da članovi antimonopolskog tela budu birani iz redova tzv. istaknutih privrednika, dakle iz redova onih koji treba da budu regulisani. Tek izgradnjom novog, delotvomog antimonopolskog zakonodavstva i obezbeđivanjem njegovog nepristrasnog i efikasnog sprovođenja biće pružena neophodna podrška drugim segmentima procesa tranzicije u našoj privredi, a pre svega privatizatizaciji. English. The paper provides suggestions and guideline for the new competition policy legislation. The suggestions are based on the analysis of the current federal antitrust legislation and its shortcomings. The new legislation must tackle the following main issues: creation of market power (monopoly and other noncompetitive market structures, the effects of horizontal and vertical mergers to market structures, and establishment of appropriate antitrust institution (commission), with precisely defined authorities, responsibilities, decision-making criteria and procedures , election procedures and mandates of every member of the commission, and strictly enforced principle of the transparent operations of the commission. It is necessary to avoid the room for the provision of the actual antitrust legislation that "prominent businessmen" should be the commissionaires: hence to regulate themselves. The establishment of the new, effective antitrust legislation and its unbiased and efficient enforcement will provide solid base for the competition policy, which in tum will provide support to other segments of transition of Yug oslav economy , first of all to the priva1isation process.

Suggested Citation

  • Begović, Boris & Bukvić, Rajko, 1998. "Antimonopolska politika: predlog rešenja [Competition policy: A suggestion]," MPRA Paper 81534, University Library of Munich, Germany, revised 1998.
    • Handle: RePEc:pra:mprapa:81534
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/81534/1/MPRA_paper_81534.pdf
    File Function: original version
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Baumol, William J, 1982. "Contestable Markets: An Uprising in the Theory of Industry Structure," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 72(1), pages 1-15, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Peter Kuhn, 1982. "Malfeasance in Long Term Employment Contracts: A New General Model with an Application to Unionism," NBER Working Papers 1045, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    2. Dasgupta Utteeyo, 2011. "Are Entry Threats Always Credible?," The B.E. Journal of Economic Analysis & Policy, De Gruyter, vol. 11(1), pages 1-41, December.
    3. Maria Lorek, 2013. "Des pôles de croissance vers des systèmes d’innovation territorialisés dans une « nouvelle » économie de marche : le cas de Gdansk, Pologne [The poles of growth and conversion of industrial territo," Working Papers 274, Laboratoire de Recherche sur l'Industrie et l'Innovation. ULCO / Research Unit on Industry and Innovation.
    4. Shi, Guanming & Stiegert, Kyle & Chavas, Jean Paul, 2010. "An Analysis of Pricing in Horizontal and Vertical Markets: The Case of the Cottonseed Market," Working Papers 201439, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Department of Agricultural and Applied Economics, Food System Research Group.
    5. Ghosal, Vivek, 2007. "Small is Beautiful but Size Matters: The Asymmetric Impact of Uncertainty and Sunk Costs on Small and Large Businesses," MPRA Paper 5461, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    6. Boone, Jan, 2004. "Balance of Power," CEPR Discussion Papers 4733, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.
    7. Ying Li & Yung-Ho Chiu & Tai-Yu Lin & Tzu-Han Chang, 2020. "Pre-Evaluating the Technical Efficiency Gains from Potential Mergers and Acquisitions in the IC Design Industry," International Journal of Information Technology & Decision Making (IJITDM), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 19(02), pages 525-559, April.
    8. David Encaoua & Michel Moreaux, 1987. "L'analyse théorique des problèmes de tarification et d'allocation des coûts dans les télécommunications," Revue Économique, Programme National Persée, vol. 38(2), pages 375-414.
    9. Oh, Dong-hyun, 2015. "Productivity growth, technical change and economies of scale of Korean fossil-fuel generation companies, 2001–2012: A dual approach," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 49(C), pages 113-121.
    10. Usman Bashir & Zaheer Abbas & Muntazir Hussain, 2014. "The Effect of Foreign Bank Presence on Domestic Banks Performance: An Evidence from a Developing Economy," Acta Universitatis Danubius. OEconomica, Danubius University of Galati, issue 2(2), pages 36-50, April.
    11. K. -L. Wang & Y. -T. Tseng & C. -C. Weng, 2003. "A study of production efficiencies of integrated securities firms in Taiwan," Applied Financial Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 13(3), pages 159-167.
    12. Günter Knieps, 2006. "Competition in the Post-Trade Markets: A Network Economic Analysis of the Securities Business," Journal of Industry, Competition and Trade, Springer, vol. 6(1), pages 45-60, March.
    13. Takeshima, Hiroyuki & Hatzenbuehler, Patrick L. & Edeh, Hyacinth O., 2020. "Effects of agricultural mechanization on economies of scope in crop production in Nigeria," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 177(C).
    14. Maciej Czaplewski, 2015. "Oddziaływanie regulacyjne Unii Europejskiej na rynek usług telekomunikacyjnych," Gospodarka Narodowa. The Polish Journal of Economics, Warsaw School of Economics, issue 5, pages 65-87.
    15. Çetin, Tamer & Yasin Eryigit, Kadir, 2013. "The economic effects of government regulation: Evidence from the New York taxicab market," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 25(C), pages 169-177.
    16. Yingzhuo Yu & Cesar Escalante & Xiaohui Deng & Jack Houston & Lewell Gunter, 2011. "Analysing scale and scope specialization efficiencies of US agricultural and nonagricultural banks using the Fourier flexible functional form," Applied Financial Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 21(15), pages 1103-1116.
    17. John K. Ashton, 2000. "A General Test of Competitive Conditions in the UK Building Society Mortgage Market: 1990-1996," The Service Industries Journal, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 20(1), pages 86-94, January.
    18. Rui Baptista & Vítor Escária & Paulo Madruga, 2008. "Entrepreneurship, regional development and job creation: the case of Portugal," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 30(1), pages 49-58, January.
    19. Bruno S. Frey, 1991. "Demand for, and Supply of, Institutions," Rationality and Society, , vol. 3(2), pages 258-260, April.
    20. Howard Smith & Simon Latcovich, 2000. "Sinking the Internet: Pricing, Sunk Costs, and Market Structure Online," Economics Series Working Papers 36, University of Oxford, Department of Economics.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    konkurencija; monopol ; antimonopolsko zakonodavstvo; tržišne strukture; tržišna moć competition; monopoly; antitrust legislation ; market structures; market power;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • D40 - Microeconomics - - Market Structure, Pricing, and Design - - - General
    • K20 - Law and Economics - - Regulation and Business Law - - - General
    • K21 - Law and Economics - - Regulation and Business Law - - - Antitrust Law
    • L40 - Industrial Organization - - Antitrust Issues and Policies - - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:pra:mprapa:81534. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Joachim Winter (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/vfmunde.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.