IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/pra/mprapa/76170.html

Merkezi Yönetimin Vergi Gelirlerini Yerel Yönetimlere Dağıtımı (Küreyerelleşme)
[Disturbition of Tax Revenue of Central Government to Local Governments (Glocalization)]

Author

Listed:
  • Kaplanhan, Fatih
  • Korkut, Cem

Abstract

Main questions of this study are “How much autonomy?” and “Has autonomy take to feudalism?” Although the resolution of issue according to effective, efficient, rational and fair principles about the income distribution between the central administration and the municipalities is a precondition of permanent and efficient services of local governments. This study aims to identify regional goverments tasks and improve services of central governments with taxes (VAT) distirbution method. We also aim toincrease taxes that are collected from regional governments with the method of glocalization. In addition, if sharing criteria was different, it would how a change between the years 2003-2011 will be investigated. During the comprehensive analysis of these years with public revenues on the basis of VAT, local government’s expenditure, criteria/data to be applied to the share of public revenues to municipalities whether changing the method financing of municipalities can make local governments more efficient and productive will be explored.In a political structure that municipalities are financed from the center, it is very difficult to find an appropriate combination of equality and justice in the distribution of income. Local governments must have privileges which are proportionate with responsibilities on own mandates and source of income for producing to serve as an effective and efficient local services. The results show that if the central governments give budget to regional government according to taxes that are collected in this region, the productivity of taxation increase and regional government can collect taxes easier.

Suggested Citation

  • Kaplanhan, Fatih & Korkut, Cem, 2014. "Merkezi Yönetimin Vergi Gelirlerini Yerel Yönetimlere Dağıtımı (Küreyerelleşme) [Disturbition of Tax Revenue of Central Government to Local Governments (Glocalization)]," MPRA Paper 76170, University Library of Munich, Germany, revised 10 Jan 2017.
    • Handle: RePEc:pra:mprapa:76170
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/76170/1/MPRA_paper_76170.pdf
    File Function: original version
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Glenn Jenkins & Rup Khadka, 1998. "Tax Reform In Singapore," Development Discussion Papers 1998-03, JDI Executive Programs.
    2. Robert W. McGee (ed.), 2008. "Taxation and Public Finance in Transition and Developing Economies," Springer Books, Springer, number 978-0-387-25712-9, March.
    3. Friedrich Schneider (ed.), 2011. "Handbook on the Shadow Economy," Books, Edward Elgar Publishing, number 13432, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Florin Alexandru Roman & Monica Violeta Achim & Robert W. McGee, 2023. "Fraud related to EU funds. The case of Romania," Journal of Financial Studies, Institute of Financial Studies, vol. 14(8), pages 120-142, May.
    2. Dominik H. Enste, 2018. "The shadow economy in industrial countries," IZA World of Labor, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA), pages 1-11, November.
    3. repec:ces:ifodic:v:14:y:2017:i:4:p:19267788 is not listed on IDEAS
    4. Guerino Ardizzi & Carmelo Petraglia & Massimiliano Piacenza & Gilberto Turati, 2014. "Measuring the Underground Economy with the Currency Demand Approach: A Reinterpretation of the Methodology, With an Application to Italy," Review of Income and Wealth, International Association for Research in Income and Wealth, vol. 60(4), pages 747-772, December.
    5. Abdullah Yahia Moqbile Ahmed, 2017. "The Impact of Exposure to Advertisement Online on Purchase Decision Empirical Study of Saudi Customers in Western Region," International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, Human Resource Management Academic Research Society, International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, vol. 7(7), pages 366-386, July.
    6. Colin C. Williams & Slavko Bezeredi, 2017. "Tackling The Illegal Practice Of Under-Reporting Employees’ Wages: Lessons From The Republic Of Macedonia," UTMS Journal of Economics, University of Tourism and Management, Skopje, Macedonia, vol. 8(3), pages 243-258.
    7. Friedrich Schneider, 2012. "The Shadow Economy and Tax Evasion: What Do We (Not) Know?," CESifo Forum, ifo Institute - Leibniz Institute for Economic Research at the University of Munich, vol. 13(02), pages 03-12, July.
    8. Wang, Lanfang & Wang, Susheng, 2012. "Economic freedom and cross-border venture capital performance," Journal of Empirical Finance, Elsevier, vol. 19(1), pages 26-50.
    9. Anastasiya Luzgina, 2017. "Problems of corruption and tax evasion in construction sector in Belarus," Post-Print hal-01705894, HAL.
    10. Schneider Friedrich, 2015. "Schattenwirtschaft und Schattenarbeitsmarkt: Die Entwicklungen der vergangenen 20 Jahre," Perspektiven der Wirtschaftspolitik, De Gruyter, vol. 16(1), pages 3-25, March.
    11. Schneider Friedrich & Buehn Andreas, 2017. "Shadow Economy: Estimation Methods, Problems, Results and Open questions," Open Economics, De Gruyter, vol. 1(1), pages 1-29, March.
    12. Hoseini, M., 2014. "Misreporting in the Value-Added Tax and the Optimal Enforcement," Other publications TiSEM b8a0a931-1092-4c98-bd36-4, Tilburg University, School of Economics and Management.
    13. Friedrich Schneider & Gorana Krstić & Milojko Arsić & Saša Ranđelović, 2015. "What Is the Extent of the Shadow Economy in Serbia?," Contributions to Economics, in: Gorana Krstić & Friedrich Schneider (ed.), Formalizing the Shadow Economy in Serbia, edition 127, chapter 0, pages 47-75, Springer.
    14. Friedrich Schneider & Andreas Buehn & Claudio E. Montenegro, 2011. "Shadow Economies All Over the World: New Estimates for 162 Countries from 1999 to 2007," Chapters, in: Friedrich Schneider (ed.), Handbook on the Shadow Economy, chapter 1, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    15. López-Laborda, Julio & Peña, Guillermo, 2016. "Is financial VAT neutral to financial sector size?," Economics Discussion Papers 2016-31, Kiel Institute for the World Economy (IfW Kiel).
    16. Dominik H. Enste, 2011. "Who is Working Illicitly and Why? Insights from Representative Survey Data in Germany," Chapters, in: Friedrich Schneider (ed.), Handbook on the Shadow Economy, chapter 9, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    17. Ceyhun Elgin & Friedrich Schneider, 2016. "Shadow Economies in OECD Countries: DGE vs. MIMIC Approaches," Bogazici Journal, Review of Social, Economic and Administrative Studies, Bogazici University, Department of Economics, vol. 30(1), pages 51-75.
    18. Björn Jahnke, 2017. "How does petty corruption affect tax morale in sub-Saharan Africa? An empirical analysis," WIDER Working Paper Series 008, World Institute for Development Economic Research (UNU-WIDER).
    19. Krasynska Svitlana, 2015. "Contra Spem Spero: The Third Sector’s Resilience in the Face of Political Turbulence and Legislative Change in Ukraine," Nonprofit Policy Forum, De Gruyter, vol. 6(2), pages 167-186, August.
    20. Bejaković Predrag & Bezeredi Slavko, 2019. "Determinants of Tax Morale in Croatia: an Ordered Logit Model," Business Systems Research, Sciendo, vol. 10(2), pages 37-48, September.
    21. Brindusa Mihaela TUDOSE & Raluca Irina CLIPA, 2016. "An Analysis Of The Shadow Economy In Eu Countries," CES Working Papers, Centre for European Studies, Alexandru Ioan Cuza University, vol. 8(2), pages 303-312, August.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    JEL classification:

    • H21 - Public Economics - - Taxation, Subsidies, and Revenue - - - Efficiency; Optimal Taxation
    • R51 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - Regional Government Analysis - - - Finance in Urban and Rural Economies

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:pra:mprapa:76170. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Joachim Winter (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/vfmunde.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.