IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/pra/mprapa/58204.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Optimization and Simulation Modeling of Disaster Relief Supply Chain: A Literature Review

Author

Listed:
  • Feng, Keli
  • Bizimana, Emmanuel
  • Agu, Deedee D.
  • Issac, Tana T.

Abstract

Recent natural and man-made disasters underscore the need of a resilient and agile disaster relief supply chain to mitigate the damages and save people’s lives. Optimization and simulation modeling have become powerful and useful tools to help decision makers tackle problems related to disaster relief supply chain. This paper reviews optimization and simulation models used in the field of disaster relief supply chain. We review the literature of the facility location optimization problems of disaster relief supply chain under different types of disastrous events. We review the literature of simulation models on supply chain design and disaster relief distribution operations. Finally, we propose two future research directions for disaster relief supply chain modeling.

Suggested Citation

  • Feng, Keli & Bizimana, Emmanuel & Agu, Deedee D. & Issac, Tana T., 2012. "Optimization and Simulation Modeling of Disaster Relief Supply Chain: A Literature Review," MPRA Paper 58204, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    • Handle: RePEc:pra:mprapa:58204
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/58204/1/MPRA_paper_58204.pdf
    File Function: original version
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Murali, Pavankumar & Ordóñez, Fernando & Dessouky, Maged M., 2012. "Facility location under demand uncertainty: Response to a large-scale bio-terror attack," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 46(1), pages 78-87.
    2. Tingting Cui & Yanfeng Ouyang & Zuo-Jun Max Shen, 2010. "Reliable Facility Location Design Under the Risk of Disruptions," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 58(4-part-1), pages 998-1011, August.
    3. Li, Xiaopeng & Ouyang, Yanfeng, 2010. "A continuum approximation approach to reliable facility location design under correlated probabilistic disruptions," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 44(4), pages 535-548, May.
    4. Eva K. Lee & Siddhartha Maheshwary & Jacquelyn Mason & William Glisson, 2006. "Large-Scale Dispensing for Emergency Response to Bioterrorism and Infectious-Disease Outbreak," Interfaces, INFORMS, vol. 36(6), pages 591-607, December.
    5. Mark H. Whitworth, 2006. "Designing the Response to an Anthrax Attack," Interfaces, INFORMS, vol. 36(6), pages 562-568, December.
    6. Nathaniel Hupert & Alvin I. Mushlin & Mark A. Callahan, 2002. "Modeling the Public Health Response to Bioterrorism: Using Discrete Event Simulation to Design Antibiotic Distribution Centers," Medical Decision Making, , vol. 22(1_suppl), pages 17-25, September.
    7. Felipe Caro & Kumar Rajaram & Jens Wollenweber, 2012. "Process Location and Product Distribution with Uncertain Yields," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 60(5), pages 1050-1063, October.
    8. Mozart Menezes & O. Berman & D. Krass, 2007. "Facility Reliability Issues in Network p-Median Problems: Strategic Centralization and Co-location Effects," Post-Print halshs-00170396, HAL.
    9. Kay Aaby & Jeffrey W. Herrmann & Carol S. Jordan & Mark Treadwell & Kathy Wood, 2006. "Montgomery County’s Public Health Service Uses Operations Research to Plan Emergency Mass Dispensing and Vaccination Clinics," Interfaces, INFORMS, vol. 36(6), pages 569-579, December.
    10. L N Van Wassenhove, 2006. "Humanitarian aid logistics: supply chain management in high gear," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 57(5), pages 475-489, May.
    11. F. Maon & A. Lindgreen & J. Vanhamme, 2009. "Developing supply chains in disaster relief operations through cross-sector socially oriented collaborations : a theoretical model," Post-Print hal-00575871, HAL.
    12. Jamie Dekle & Mariel S. Lavieri & Erica Martin & Hülya Emir-Farinas & Richard L. Francis, 2005. "A Florida County Locates Disaster Recovery Centers," Interfaces, INFORMS, vol. 35(2), pages 133-139, April.
    13. E J Lodree Jr & S Taskin, 2008. "An insurance risk management framework for disaster relief and supply chain disruption inventory planning," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 59(5), pages 674-684, May.
    14. Cui, Tingting & Ouyang, Yanfeng & Shen, Zuo-Jun Max J, 2010. "Reliable Facility Location Design under the Risk of Disruptions," University of California Transportation Center, Working Papers qt5sh2c7pw, University of California Transportation Center.
    15. Lawrence V. Snyder & Mark S. Daskin, 2005. "Reliability Models for Facility Location: The Expected Failure Cost Case," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 39(3), pages 400-416, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Weijun Xie & Yanfeng Ouyang & Sze Chun Wong, 2016. "Reliable Location-Routing Design Under Probabilistic Facility Disruptions," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 50(3), pages 1128-1138, August.
    2. Zhang, Ying & Snyder, Lawrence V. & Qi, Mingyao & Miao, Lixin, 2016. "A heterogeneous reliable location model with risk pooling under supply disruptions," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 83(C), pages 151-178.
    3. Michael K. Lim & Achal Bassamboo & Sunil Chopra & Mark S. Daskin, 2013. "Facility Location Decisions with Random Disruptions and Imperfect Estimation," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 15(2), pages 239-249, May.
    4. Ahmadi-Javid, Amir & Seddighi, Amir Hossein, 2013. "A location-routing problem with disruption risk," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 53(C), pages 63-82.
    5. An, Shi & Cui, Na & Bai, Yun & Xie, Weijun & Chen, Mingliu & Ouyang, Yanfeng, 2015. "Reliable emergency service facility location under facility disruption, en-route congestion and in-facility queuing," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 82(C), pages 199-216.
    6. Luohao Tang & Cheng Zhu & Zaili Lin & Jianmai Shi & Weiming Zhang, 2016. "Reliable Facility Location Problem with Facility Protection," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 11(9), pages 1-24, September.
    7. Fahimnia, Behnam & Jabbarzadeh, Armin, 2016. "Marrying supply chain sustainability and resilience: A match made in heaven," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 91(C), pages 306-324.
    8. F. Parvaresh & S. Hashemi Golpayegany & S. Moattar Husseini & B. Karimi, 2013. "Solving the p-hub Median Problem Under Intentional Disruptions Using Simulated Annealing," Networks and Spatial Economics, Springer, vol. 13(4), pages 445-470, December.
    9. Nader Azad & Elkafi Hassini, 2019. "A Benders Decomposition Method for Designing Reliable Supply Chain Networks Accounting for Multimitigation Strategies and Demand Losses," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 53(5), pages 1287-1312, September.
    10. Nader Azad & Georgios Saharidis & Hamid Davoudpour & Hooman Malekly & Seyed Yektamaram, 2013. "Strategies for protecting supply chain networks against facility and transportation disruptions: an improved Benders decomposition approach," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 210(1), pages 125-163, November.
    11. Zarrinpoor, Naeme & Fallahnezhad, Mohammad Saber & Pishvaee, Mir Saman, 2018. "The design of a reliable and robust hierarchical health service network using an accelerated Benders decomposition algorithm," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 265(3), pages 1013-1032.
    12. Xie, Siyang & Ouyang, Yanfeng, 2019. "Reliable service systems design under the risk of network access failures," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 122(C), pages 1-13.
    13. Fahimnia, Behnam & Jabbarzadeh, Armin & Sarkis, Joseph, 2018. "Greening versus resilience: A supply chain design perspective," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 119(C), pages 129-148.
    14. Asefeh Hasani Goodarzi & Seyed Hessameddin Zegordi & Gülgün Alpan & Isa Nakhai Kamalabadi & Ali Husseinzadeh Kashan, 2021. "Reliable cross-docking location problem under the risk of disruptions," Operational Research, Springer, vol. 21(3), pages 1569-1612, September.
    15. Zhixue Liu & Shukun Wang & Yanfeng Ouyang, 2017. "Reliable Biomass Supply Chain Design under Feedstock Seasonality and Probabilistic Facility Disruptions," Energies, MDPI, vol. 10(11), pages 1-18, November.
    16. Ghaffarinasab, Nader & Motallebzadeh, Alireza, 2018. "Hub interdiction problem variants: Models and metaheuristic solution algorithms," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 267(2), pages 496-512.
    17. Peng, Peng & Snyder, Lawrence V. & Lim, Andrew & Liu, Zuli, 2011. "Reliable logistics networks design with facility disruptions," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 45(8), pages 1190-1211, September.
    18. S.A. Torabi & J. Namdar & S.M. Hatefi & F. Jolai, 2016. "An enhanced possibilistic programming approach for reliable closed-loop supply chain network design," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 54(5), pages 1358-1387, March.
    19. Yu, Guodong & Haskell, William B. & Liu, Yang, 2017. "Resilient facility location against the risk of disruptions," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 104(C), pages 82-105.
    20. An, Yu & Zeng, Bo & Zhang, Yu & Zhao, Long, 2014. "Reliable p-median facility location problem: two-stage robust models and algorithms," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 64(C), pages 54-72.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Disaster Relief Supply Chain; Optimization; Simulation; Modeling;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • C6 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Mathematical Methods; Programming Models; Mathematical and Simulation Modeling
    • C61 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Mathematical Methods; Programming Models; Mathematical and Simulation Modeling - - - Optimization Techniques; Programming Models; Dynamic Analysis
    • C69 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Mathematical Methods; Programming Models; Mathematical and Simulation Modeling - - - Other

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:pra:mprapa:58204. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Joachim Winter (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/vfmunde.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.