IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/transe/v122y2019icp1-13.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Reliable service systems design under the risk of network access failures

Author

Listed:
  • Xie, Siyang
  • Ouyang, Yanfeng

Abstract

In service systems with natural or anthropogenic barriers (e.g., rivers, railroads), customers who intend to visit facilities for service must first pass through certain network access points (e.g., bridges, railway crossings). Possible blockage or disruptions of these access points could change the customer-facility assignments or even affect reachability of various facilities, and thus introduce facility reliability and correlation issues. This paper incorporates network access points and their probabilistic failures into a joint optimization framework. A layer of network access points are added and connected to facilities to imply the real-world connections between facilities and access points. The access points are assumed to be subject to disruptions with site-dependent probabilities. We then develop a compact mixed-integer mathematical model to optimize the facility location and customer assignment decisions for the service systems design. Lagrangian relaxation based algorithms are designed to effectively solve the proposed model. Multiple case studies are constructed to test the model and the algorithm, and to demonstrate their performance and applicability.

Suggested Citation

  • Xie, Siyang & Ouyang, Yanfeng, 2019. "Reliable service systems design under the risk of network access failures," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 122(C), pages 1-13.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:transe:v:122:y:2019:i:c:p:1-13
    DOI: 10.1016/j.tre.2018.11.002
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1366554518303004
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.tre.2018.11.002?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Tingting Cui & Yanfeng Ouyang & Zuo-Jun Max Shen, 2010. "Reliable Facility Location Design Under the Risk of Disruptions," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 58(4-part-1), pages 998-1011, August.
    2. Li, Xiaopeng & Ouyang, Yanfeng & Peng, Fan, 2013. "A supporting station model for reliable infrastructure location design under interdependent disruptions," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 60(C), pages 80-93.
    3. Liberatore, Federico & Scaparra, Maria P. & Daskin, Mark S., 2012. "Hedging against disruptions with ripple effects in location analysis," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 40(1), pages 21-30, January.
    4. Lawrence V. Snyder & Mark S. Daskin, 2005. "Reliability Models for Facility Location: The Expected Failure Cost Case," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 39(3), pages 400-416, August.
    5. Oded Berman & Dmitry Krass & Mozart B. C. Menezes, 2007. "Facility Reliability Issues in Network p -Median Problems: Strategic Centralization and Co-Location Effects," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 55(2), pages 332-350, April.
    6. Marshall L. Fisher, 2004. "The Lagrangian Relaxation Method for Solving Integer Programming Problems," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 50(12_supple), pages 1861-1871, December.
    7. Mengshi Lu & Lun Ran & Zuo-Jun Max Shen, 2015. "Reliable Facility Location Design Under Uncertain Correlated Disruptions," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 17(4), pages 445-455, October.
    8. Li, Xiaopeng & Ouyang, Yanfeng, 2010. "A continuum approximation approach to reliable facility location design under correlated probabilistic disruptions," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 44(4), pages 535-548, May.
    9. Mozart Menezes & O. Berman & D. Krass, 2007. "Facility Reliability Issues in Network p-Median Problems: Strategic Centralization and Co-location Effects," Post-Print halshs-00170396, HAL.
    10. Xie, Siyang & Li, Xiaopeng & Ouyang, Yanfeng, 2015. "Decomposition of general facility disruption correlations via augmentation of virtual supporting stations," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 80(C), pages 64-81.
    11. Cui, Tingting & Ouyang, Yanfeng & Shen, Zuo-Jun Max J, 2010. "Reliable Facility Location Design under the Risk of Disruptions," University of California Transportation Center, Working Papers qt5sh2c7pw, University of California Transportation Center.
    12. Marshall L. Fisher, 2004. "Comments on ÜThe Lagrangian Relaxation Method for Solving Integer Programming ProblemsÝ," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 50(12_supple), pages 1872-1874, December.
    13. Xiaopeng Li & Yanfeng Ouyang, 2012. "Reliable Traffic Sensor Deployment Under Probabilistic Disruptions and Generalized Surveillance Effectiveness Measures," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 60(5), pages 1183-1198, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Eva Nedeliakova & Maria Hudakova & Matej Masar & Lenka Lizbetinova & Renata Stasiak-Betlejewska & Peter Šulko, 2020. "Sustainability of Railway Undertaking Services with Lean Philosophy in Risk Management—Case Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(13), pages 1-28, June.
    2. Lu, Xiaohan & Cheng, Chun, 2021. "Locating facilities with resiliency to capacity failures and correlated demand uncertainty," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 153(C).
    3. Zhang, Yanzi & Diabat, Ali & Zhang, Zhi-Hai, 2021. "Reliable closed-loop supply chain design problem under facility-type-dependent probabilistic disruptions," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 146(C), pages 180-209.
    4. Zamani, Shokufeh & Arkat, Jamal & Niaki, Seyed Taghi Akhavan, 2022. "Service interruption and customer withdrawal in the congested facility location problem," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 165(C).
    5. Jiang, Zhoutong & Ouyang, Yanfeng, 2021. "Reliable location of first responder stations for cooperative response to disasters," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 149(C), pages 20-32.
    6. Aldrighetti, Riccardo & Battini, Daria & Ivanov, Dmitry & Zennaro, Ilenia, 2021. "Costs of resilience and disruptions in supply chain network design models: A review and future research directions," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 235(C).
    7. Xie, Siyang & An, Kun & Ouyang, Yanfeng, 2019. "Planning facility location under generally correlated facility disruptions: Use of supporting stations and quasi-probabilities," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 122(C), pages 115-139.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Xie, Siyang & An, Kun & Ouyang, Yanfeng, 2019. "Planning facility location under generally correlated facility disruptions: Use of supporting stations and quasi-probabilities," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 122(C), pages 115-139.
    2. Yu, Guodong & Zhang, Jie, 2018. "Multi-dual decomposition solution for risk-averse facility location problem," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 116(C), pages 70-89.
    3. Nader Azad & Elkafi Hassini, 2019. "A Benders Decomposition Method for Designing Reliable Supply Chain Networks Accounting for Multimitigation Strategies and Demand Losses," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 53(5), pages 1287-1312, September.
    4. Cui, Jianxun & Zhao, Meng & Li, Xiaopeng & Parsafard, Mohsen & An, Shi, 2016. "Reliable design of an integrated supply chain with expedited shipments under disruption risks," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 95(C), pages 143-163.
    5. Aldrighetti, Riccardo & Battini, Daria & Ivanov, Dmitry & Zennaro, Ilenia, 2021. "Costs of resilience and disruptions in supply chain network design models: A review and future research directions," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 235(C).
    6. Jabbarzadeh, Armin & Fahimnia, Behnam & Sheu, Jiuh-Biing & Moghadam, Hani Shahmoradi, 2016. "Designing a supply chain resilient to major disruptions and supply/demand interruptions," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 94(C), pages 121-149.
    7. An, Shi & Cui, Na & Bai, Yun & Xie, Weijun & Chen, Mingliu & Ouyang, Yanfeng, 2015. "Reliable emergency service facility location under facility disruption, en-route congestion and in-facility queuing," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 82(C), pages 199-216.
    8. Zamani, Shokufeh & Arkat, Jamal & Niaki, Seyed Taghi Akhavan, 2022. "Service interruption and customer withdrawal in the congested facility location problem," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 165(C).
    9. Azad, Nader & Hassini, Elkafi, 2019. "Recovery strategies from major supply disruptions in single and multiple sourcing networks," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 275(2), pages 481-501.
    10. An, Shi & Cui, Na & Li, Xiaopeng & Ouyang, Yanfeng, 2013. "Location planning for transit-based evacuation under the risk of service disruptions," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 54(C), pages 1-16.
    11. Wang, Zhaodong & Xie, Siyang & Ouyang, Yanfeng, 2022. "Planning reliable service facility location against disruption risks and last-mile congestion in a continuous space," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 165(C), pages 123-140.
    12. Mengshi Lu & Lun Ran & Zuo-Jun Max Shen, 2015. "Reliable Facility Location Design Under Uncertain Correlated Disruptions," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 17(4), pages 445-455, October.
    13. Nader Azad & Georgios Saharidis & Hamid Davoudpour & Hooman Malekly & Seyed Yektamaram, 2013. "Strategies for protecting supply chain networks against facility and transportation disruptions: an improved Benders decomposition approach," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 210(1), pages 125-163, November.
    14. Zarrinpoor, Naeme & Fallahnezhad, Mohammad Saber & Pishvaee, Mir Saman, 2018. "The design of a reliable and robust hierarchical health service network using an accelerated Benders decomposition algorithm," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 265(3), pages 1013-1032.
    15. Jamar Kattel, Prakash & Aros-Vera, Felipe, 2020. "Critical infrastructure location under supporting station dependencies considerations," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 70(C).
    16. Xie, Siyang & Li, Xiaopeng & Ouyang, Yanfeng, 2015. "Decomposition of general facility disruption correlations via augmentation of virtual supporting stations," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 80(C), pages 64-81.
    17. Jiang, Zhoutong & Ouyang, Yanfeng, 2021. "Reliable location of first responder stations for cooperative response to disasters," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 149(C), pages 20-32.
    18. Yu, Guodong & Haskell, William B. & Liu, Yang, 2017. "Resilient facility location against the risk of disruptions," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 104(C), pages 82-105.
    19. Weijun Xie & Yanfeng Ouyang & Sze Chun Wong, 2016. "Reliable Location-Routing Design Under Probabilistic Facility Disruptions," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 50(3), pages 1128-1138, August.
    20. An, Yu & Zhang, Yu & Zeng, Bo, 2015. "The reliable hub-and-spoke design problem: Models and algorithms," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 77(C), pages 103-122.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:transe:v:122:y:2019:i:c:p:1-13. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/600244/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.