IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/pra/mprapa/55031.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Objective Principles of Economics

Author

Listed:
  • Kakarot-Handtke, Egmont

Abstract

Economists have the habit of solving the wrong problems. They speculate circumstantially about the behavior of agents and do not come to grips with the behavior of the monetary economy. This is the consequence of the methodological imperative that all explanations must run in terms of the actions and reactions of individuals. The critical point is that no way leads from the understanding of the interaction of the individuals to the understanding of the working of the economy as a whole. The solution consists in moving from subjective-behavioral axioms to objective-structural axioms, i.e. from past to future.

Suggested Citation

  • Kakarot-Handtke, Egmont, 2014. "Objective Principles of Economics," MPRA Paper 55031, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    • Handle: RePEc:pra:mprapa:55031
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/55031/1/MPRA_paper_55031.pdf
    File Function: original version
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Mark Blaug, 1990. "Economic Theories, True or False?," Books, Edward Elgar Publishing, number 49.
    2. Mark Obrinsky, 1981. "The Profit Prophets," Journal of Post Keynesian Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 3(4), pages 491-502, July.
    3. Kakarot-Handtke, Egmont, 2011. "Primary and secondary markets," MPRA Paper 32996, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    4. Weintraub, E Roy, 1985. "Joan Robinson's Critique of Equilibrium: An Appraisal," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 75(2), pages 146-149, May.
    5. Hausman,Daniel M., 1992. "The Inexact and Separate Science of Economics," Cambridge Books, Cambridge University Press, number 9780521425230, December.
    6. Johannes J. Klant, 1994. "The Nature Of Economic Thought," Books, Edward Elgar Publishing, number 262.
    7. Philip MIROWSKI, 1989. "The Rise and Fall of the Concept of Equilibrium in Economic Analysis," Discussion Papers (REL - Recherches Economiques de Louvain) 1989046, Université catholique de Louvain, Institut de Recherches Economiques et Sociales (IRES).
    8. Kakarot-Handtke, Egmont, 2014. "Exchange in the Monetary Economy," MPRA Paper 53437, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    9. Egmont Kakarot-Handtke, 2013. "Why Post Keynesianism is Not Yet a Science," Economic Analysis and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 43(1), pages 95-108, March.
    10. Mark Blaug, 2001. "No History of Ideas, Please, We're Economists," Journal of Economic Perspectives, American Economic Association, vol. 15(1), pages 145-164, Winter.
    11. Arrow, Kenneth J, 1994. "Methodological Individualism and Social Knowledge," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 84(2), pages 1-9, May.
    12. Hausman,Daniel M., 1992. "The Inexact and Separate Science of Economics," Cambridge Books, Cambridge University Press, number 9780521415019, December.
    13. Anatol Murad, 1953. "Questions for Profit Theory," American Journal of Economics and Sociology, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 13(1), pages 1-14, October.
    14. Christian Arnsperger & Yanis Varoufakis, 2006. "What Is Neoclassical Economics? The three axioms responsible for its theoretical oeuvre, practical irrelevance and, thus, discursive power," Panoeconomicus, Savez ekonomista Vojvodine, Novi Sad, Serbia, vol. 53(1), pages 5-18, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Kakarot-Handtke, Egmont, 2014. "The Law of Supply and Demand: Here It Is Finally," MPRA Paper 58004, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    2. Kakarot-Handtke, Egmont, 2014. "The Three Fatal Mistakes of Yesterday Economics: Profit, I=S, Employment," MPRA Paper 58253, University Library of Munich, Germany.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Kakarot-Handtke, Egmont, 2014. "Onblog Economics Muddle Busting," MPRA Paper 60543, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    2. Kakarot-Handtke, Egmont, 2012. "The rhetoric of failure: a hyper-dialog about method in economics and how to get things going," MPRA Paper 43276, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    3. Kakarot-Handtke, Egmont, 2013. "Confused confusers. How to stop thinking like an economist and start thinking like a scientist," MPRA Paper 44046, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    4. Kakarot-Handtke, Egmont, 2014. "The Truly General Theory of Employment: How Keynes Could Have Succeeded," MPRA Paper 54367, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    5. Kakarot-Handtke, Egmont, 2013. "Redemption and Depression," MPRA Paper 50924, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    6. Kakarot-Handtke, Egmont, 2014. "Economics for Economists," MPRA Paper 59659, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    7. Kakarot-Handtke, Egmont, 2013. "The Ideal Economy: A Prototype," MPRA Paper 51582, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    8. John B. Davis, 2013. "Mark Blaug on the historiography of economics," Chapters, in: Marcel Boumans & Matthias Klaes (ed.), Mark Blaug: Rebel with Many Causes, chapter 12, pages 159-176, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    9. Drakopoulos, Stavros A., 2014. "Mainstream Aversion to Economic Methodology and the Scientific Ideal of Physics," MPRA Paper 57222, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    10. Kakarot-Handtke, Egmont, 2014. "The Synthesis of Economic Law, Evolution, and History," MPRA Paper 58842, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    11. Stavros A. DRAKOPOULOS, 2016. "Economic crisis, economic methodology and the scientific ideal of physics," The Journal of Philosophical Economics, Bucharest Academy of Economic Studies, The Journal of Philosophical Economics, vol. 10(1), pages 28-57, November.
    12. Stavros A. Drakopoulos & Anastassios D. Karayiannis, 2005. "A Review of Kuhnian and Lakatosian «Explanations» in Economics," History of Economic Ideas, Fabrizio Serra Editore, Pisa - Roma, vol. 13(2), pages 51-73.
    13. Kakarot-Handtke, Egmont, 2013. "The Structural Price Mechanism," MPRA Paper 50585, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    14. Suzuki, Tomo, 2003. "The accounting figuration of business statistics as a foundation for the spread of economic ideas," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 28(1), pages 65-95, January.
    15. Kevin D. Hoover, 2016. "The Crisis in Economic Theory: A Review Essay," Journal of Economic Literature, American Economic Association, vol. 54(4), pages 1350-1361, December.
    16. Itzhak Gilboa & Andrew Postlewaite & Larry Samuelson & David Schmeidler, 2011. "Economic Models as Analogies," PIER Working Paper Archive 12-001, Penn Institute for Economic Research, Department of Economics, University of Pennsylvania.
    17. Mur, Jesús & Angulo, Ana, 2009. "Model selection strategies in a spatial setting: Some additional results," Regional Science and Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 39(2), pages 200-213, March.
    18. Itzhak Gilboa & Andrew Postlewaite & Larry Samuelson & David Schmeidler, 2014. "A Model of Modeling," PIER Working Paper Archive 14-026, Penn Institute for Economic Research, Department of Economics, University of Pennsylvania.
    19. Miguel A. Duran, 2007. "Mathematical Needs and Economic Interpretations," Contributions to Political Economy, Cambridge Political Economy Society, vol. 26(1), pages 1-16.
    20. Ole Røgeberg & Morten Nordberg, 2005. "A defence of absurd theories in economics," Journal of Economic Methodology, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 12(4), pages 543-562.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    new framework of concepts; structure-centric; axiom set; methodology; complex adaptive system; profit;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • B59 - Schools of Economic Thought and Methodology - - Current Heterodox Approaches - - - Other
    • D01 - Microeconomics - - General - - - Microeconomic Behavior: Underlying Principles
    • D50 - Microeconomics - - General Equilibrium and Disequilibrium - - - General

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:pra:mprapa:55031. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Joachim Winter (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/vfmunde.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.