A Review of Kuhnian and Lakatosian «Explanations» in Economics
In the last few decades the influence on economics of the ideas of T. Kuhn and I. Lakatos was considerable. The increasing use of terms like «paradigms» and «scientific research programmes» in almost every field of economics, is indicative of the influence of these two philosophers. Furthermore, the introduction of the ideas of Kuhn and Lakatos in economics gave the stimulus for work on the nature of growth of economic knowledge. The paper starts by presenting the main influence of T. Kuhn on theories concerned with the evolution of economic theory. It continues with a review of the main criticisms regarding the appropriateness and applicability of Kuhnian ideas for economics. The same approach is followed in the case of I. Lakatos. After a classification and discussion of the main findings, the paper attempts to offer an interpretation of the general impact of these two philosophers of science on ideas relating to the development of economic theories.
If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to look for a different version under "Related research" (further below) or search for a different version of it.
References listed on IDEAS
Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.:
- Weintraub, E. Roy, 1985. "Appraising General Equilibrium Analysis," Economics and Philosophy, Cambridge University Press, vol. 1(01), pages 23-37, April.
- Backhouse, Roger E., 1993. "Lakatosian Perspectives on General Equilibrium Analysis," Economics and Philosophy, Cambridge University Press, vol. 9(02), pages 271-282, October.
- Terrence Bensel & Bruce Elmslie, 1992. "Rethinking international trade theory: a methodological appraisal," Review of World Economics (Weltwirtschaftliches Archiv), Springer;Institut für Weltwirtschaft (Kiel Institute for the World Economy), vol. 128(2), pages 249-265, June.
- Leonard Kunin & F. Stirton Weaver, 1971. "On the Structure of Scientific Revolutions in Economics," History of Political Economy, Duke University Press, vol. 3(2), pages 391-397, Fall.
- Siobhain McGovern, 1995. "On a maze of second thoughts and on the methodology of economic methodology," Journal of Economic Methodology, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 2(2), pages 223-238.
- Bofinger, Peter & Wollmershäuser, Timo, 2003.
"Managed floating as a monetary policy strategy,"
Munich Reprints in Economics
20206, University of Munich, Department of Economics.
- John Nightingale, 1994. "Situational determinism revisited: scientific research programmes in economics twenty years on," Journal of Economic Methodology, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 1(2), pages 233-252.
- Backhouse, R.E., 1993. "The Lakatosian Legacy in Economnic Methodology," Discussion Papers 93-14, Department of Economics, University of Birmingham.
- Loasby, Brian J, 1971. "Hypothesis and Paradigm in the Theory of the Firm," Economic Journal, Royal Economic Society, vol. 81(324), pages 863-885, December.
- George J. Stigler, 1969. "Does Economics Have a Useful Past?," History of Political Economy, Duke University Press, vol. 1(2), pages 217-230, Fall.
- Hausman,Daniel M., 1992. "The Inexact and Separate Science of Economics," Cambridge Books, Cambridge University Press, number 9780521425230, December.
- John A. List, 2003.
"Neoclassical Theory Versus Prospect Theory: Evidence from the Marketplace,"
NBER Working Papers
9736, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
- John A. List, 2004. "Neoclassical Theory Versus Prospect Theory: Evidence from the Marketplace," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 72(2), pages 615-625, 03.
- John List, 2004. "Neoclassical theory versus prospect theory: Evidence from the marketplace," Framed Field Experiments 00174, The Field Experiments Website.
- Eichner, Alfred S & Kregel, J A, 1975. "An Essay on Post-Keynesian Theory: A New Paradigm in Economics," Journal of Economic Literature, American Economic Association, vol. 13(4), pages 1293-1314, December.
- Rosenberg, Alexander, 1986. "Lakatosian Consolations for Economics," Economics and Philosophy, Cambridge University Press, vol. 2(01), pages 127-139, April.
- Sheila C. Dow, 1981. "Weintraub and Wiles: The Methodological Basis of Policy Conflict," Journal of Post Keynesian Economics, M.E. Sharpe, Inc., vol. 3(3), pages 325-339, April.
- Michael Zweig, 1971. "Bourgeois and Radical Paradigms in Economics," Review of Radical Political Economics, Union for Radical Political Economics, vol. 3(2), pages 43-58, July.
- De Vroey, Michel, 2001. "Price Rigidity and Market-Clearing: A Conceptual Clarification," Cambridge Journal of Economics, Oxford University Press, vol. 25(5), pages 639-655, September.
- Salanti, Andrea, 1991. "Roy Weintraub's Studies in Appraisal: Lakatosian Consolations or Something Else?," Economics and Philosophy, Cambridge University Press, vol. 7(02), pages 221-234, October.
- Maarten C. W. Janssen, 1991. "What Is This Thing Called Microfoundations?," History of Political Economy, Duke University Press, vol. 23(4), pages 687-712, Winter.
- Cross, Rodney, 1982. "The Duhem-Quine Thesis, Lakatos and the Appraisal of Theories in Macroeconomics," Economic Journal, Royal Economic Society, vol. 92(366), pages 320-340, June.
- A. E. Fernández Jilberto, 1991. "Introduction," International Journal of Political Economy, M.E. Sharpe, Inc., vol. 21(1), pages 3-9, April.
- Mark Blaug, 1972. "Was There a Marginal Revolution?," History of Political Economy, Duke University Press, vol. 4(2), pages 269-280, Fall.
- Hoover, K.D., 1990. "Scientific Research Program Or Tribe? A Joint Appraisal Of Lakatos And The New Classical Macroeconomics," Papers 69, California Davis - Institute of Governmental Affairs.
- Backhouse, R.E., 1991. "Lakatos and Economics," Discussion Papers 91-04, Department of Economics, University of Birmingham.
- Hausman,Daniel M., 1992. "The Inexact and Separate Science of Economics," Cambridge Books, Cambridge University Press, number 9780521415019, December.
- Zouboulakis, Michel S., 2001. "Why do Evaluative Histories Matter after all?," Journal of the History of Economic Thought, Cambridge University Press, vol. 23(03), pages 369-381, September.
- Blaug, Mark, 1976. "The Empirical Status of Human Capital Theory: A Slightly Jaundiced Survey," Journal of Economic Literature, American Economic Association, vol. 14(3), pages 827-855, September.
- Andrea Salanti, 1994. "On the Lakatosian apple of discord in the history and methodology of economics," Finnish Economic Papers, Finnish Economic Association, vol. 7(1), pages 30-41, Spring.
- Louca, Francisco, 2001. "Intriguing Pendula: Founding Metaphors in the Analysis of Economic Fluctuations," Cambridge Journal of Economics, Oxford University Press, vol. 25(1), pages 25-55, January.
- G. Fulton, 1984. "Research Programmes in Economics," History of Political Economy, Duke University Press, vol. 16(2), pages 187-205, Summer.
- Rodney Maddock, 1984. "Rational Expectations Macrotheory: a Lakatosian Case Study in Program Adjustment," History of Political Economy, Duke University Press, vol. 16(2), pages 291-309, Summer.
- Arjo Klamer, 1984. "Levels of Discourse in New Classical Economics," History of Political Economy, Duke University Press, vol. 16(2), pages 263-290, Summer.
- Weintraub, E Roy, 1999. "How Should We Write the History of Twentieth-Century Economics?," Oxford Review of Economic Policy, Oxford University Press, vol. 15(4), pages 139-152, Winter.
When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hid:journl:v:13:y:2005:2:3:p:51-73. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Mario Aldo Cedrini)
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.
If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.