IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/pra/mprapa/129065.html

Robust Estimation of Structural Equation Modeling using Mahalanobis Distance-based Trimming: An Application to Job Performance Data

Author

Listed:
  • Zulfiqar, Ammara
  • Aziz, Mahwish
  • Wahid, Abdul

Abstract

Structural Equation Modeling (SEM) is a commonly used and prevalent method to describe the relationships between latent and observed variables. If these variables contain outliers and leverage-points, the estimation by existing SEM is problematic and leads to biased and inefficient estimators. In this article, we propose the Least Mahalanobis Distance-based Trimmed (LMDT) model which uses Mahalanobis distance for the identification of outliers in SEM and trimming approach for dealing with such types of influential observations. By using this suggested technique, instead of maximum likelihood and least squares criteria, the LMDT is resistant to outliers in both measurement error and latent factors. A FAST-iterative algorithm is constructed and implemented for computing the LMDT. Both a simulation study and a real data analysis indicate that the proposed robust method has good performance in terms of bias and efficiency on contaminated and non-normal skewed data and it outperforms the two non-robust and one robust existing estimation methods.

Suggested Citation

  • Zulfiqar, Ammara & Aziz, Mahwish & Wahid, Abdul, 2026. "Robust Estimation of Structural Equation Modeling using Mahalanobis Distance-based Trimming: An Application to Job Performance Data," MPRA Paper 129065, University Library of Munich, Germany.
  • Handle: RePEc:pra:mprapa:129065
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/129065/1/MPRA_paper_129065.pdf
    File Function: original version
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. N. A. Campbell, 1980. "Robust Procedures in Multivariate Analysis I: Robust Covariance Estimation," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series C, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 29(3), pages 231-237, November.
    2. Ke-Hai Yuan & Zhiyong Zhang, 2012. "Robust Structural Equation Modeling with Missing Data and Auxiliary Variables," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 77(4), pages 803-826, October.
    3. Andrew D. Grotzinger & Mijke Rhemtulla & Ronald Vlaming & Stuart J. Ritchie & Travis T. Mallard & W. David Hill & Hill F. Ip & Riccardo E. Marioni & Andrew M. McIntosh & Ian J. Deary & Philipp D. Koel, 2019. "Genomic structural equation modelling provides insights into the multivariate genetic architecture of complex traits," Nature Human Behaviour, Nature, vol. 3(5), pages 513-525, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Gökberk Alagöz & Else Eising & Yasmina Mekki & Giacomo Bignardi & Pierre Fontanillas & Michel G. Nivard & Michelle Luciano & Nancy J. Cox & Simon E. Fisher & Reyna L. Gordon, 2025. "The shared genetic architecture and evolution of human language and musical rhythm," Nature Human Behaviour, Nature, vol. 9(2), pages 376-390, February.
    2. Pietro Demela & Nicola Pirastu & Blagoje Soskic, 2023. "Cross-disorder genetic analysis of immune diseases reveals distinct gene associations that converge on common pathways," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 14(1), pages 1-12, December.
    3. Marie C. Sadler & Alexander Apostolov & Caterina Cevallos & Chiara Auwerx & Diogo M. Ribeiro & Russ B. Altman & Zoltán Kutalik, 2025. "Leveraging large-scale biobank EHRs to enhance pharmacogenetics of cardiometabolic disease medications," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 16(1), pages 1-18, December.
    4. Wessel N. van Wieringen & Carel F. W. Peeters & Renee X. de Menezes & Mark A. van de Wiel, 2018. "Testing for pathway (in)activation by using Gaussian graphical models," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series C, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 67(5), pages 1419-1436, November.
    5. Essid, Hédi & Ouellette, Pierre & Vigeant, Stéphane, 2010. "Measuring efficiency of Tunisian schools in the presence of quasi-fixed inputs: A bootstrap data envelopment analysis approach," Economics of Education Review, Elsevier, vol. 29(4), pages 589-596, August.
    6. Wang, Chao & Zhan, Jinyan & Wang, Huihui & Yang, Zheng & Chu, Xi & Liu, Wei & Teng, Yanmin & Liu, Huizi & Wang, Yifan, 2022. "Multi-group analysis on the mechanism of residents' low-carbon behaviors in Beijing, China," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 183(C).
    7. Michael G. Levin & Noah L. Tsao & Pankhuri Singhal & Chang Liu & Ha My T. Vy & Ishan Paranjpe & Joshua D. Backman & Tiffany R. Bellomo & William P. Bone & Kiran J. Biddinger & Qin Hui & Ozan Dikilitas, 2022. "Genome-wide association and multi-trait analyses characterize the common genetic architecture of heart failure," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 13(1), pages 1-15, December.
    8. Janz, Norbert, 1997. "Robust GMM Estimation of an Euler Equation Investment Model with German Firm Level Panel Data," ZEW Discussion Papers 97-05, ZEW - Leibniz Centre for European Economic Research.
    9. Anna Gui & Anja Hollowell & Emilie M. Wigdor & Morgan J. Morgan & Laurie J. Hannigan & Elizabeth C. Corfield & Veronika Odintsova & Jouke-Jan Hottenga & Andrew Wong & René Pool & Harriet Cullen & Siân, 2025. "Genome-wide association meta-analysis of age at onset of walking in over 70,000 infants of European ancestry," Nature Human Behaviour, Nature, vol. 9(7), pages 1470-1487, July.
    10. Siquan Zhou & Yujie Xu & Jingyuan Xiong & Guo Cheng, 2025. "Cross-trait multivariate GWAS confirms health implications of pubertal timing," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 16(1), pages 1-14, December.
    11. Aleš Toman, 2014. "Robust confirmatory factor analysis based on the forward search algorithm," Statistical Papers, Springer, vol. 55(1), pages 233-252, February.
    12. Knyspel, Jacob & Plomin, Robert, 2024. "Comparing factor and network models of cognitive abilities using twin data," Intelligence, Elsevier, vol. 104(C).
    13. François Bavaud, 2011. "On the Schoenberg Transformations in Data Analysis: Theory and Illustrations," Journal of Classification, Springer;The Classification Society, vol. 28(3), pages 297-314, October.
    14. Sudhanshu Kumar MISHRA, 2008. "A New Method Of Robust Linear Regression Analysis: Some Monte Carlo Experiments," Journal of Applied Economic Sciences, Spiru Haret University, Faculty of Financial Management and Accounting Craiova, vol. 3(3(5)_Fall), pages 261-268.
    15. Lingzhi Chen & Ričardas Zitikis, 2020. "Quantifying and analyzing nonlinear relationships with a fresh look at a classical dataset of student scores," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 54(4), pages 1145-1169, August.
    16. Tabea Schoeler & Jean-Baptiste Pingault & Zoltán Kutalik, 2025. "The impact of self-report inaccuracy in the UK Biobank and its interplay with selective participation," Nature Human Behaviour, Nature, vol. 9(3), pages 584-594, March.
    17. Ke-Hai Yuan & Peter Bentler, 2000. "Robust mean and covariance structure analysis through iteratively reweighted least squares," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 65(1), pages 43-58, March.
    18. Choulakian, V., 2001. "Robust Q-mode principal component analysis in L1," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 37(2), pages 135-150, August.
    19. Ke-Hai Yuan & Wai Chan & Yubin Tian, 2016. "Expectation-robust algorithm and estimating equations for means and dispersion matrix with missing data," Annals of the Institute of Statistical Mathematics, Springer;The Institute of Statistical Mathematics, vol. 68(2), pages 329-351, April.
    20. Christopher H. Arehart & Meng Lin & Raine A. Gibson & Sridharan Raghavan & Christopher R. Gignoux & Maggie A. Stanislawski & Andrew D. Grotzinger & Luke M. Evans, 2025. "Modeling the genomic architecture of adiposity and anthropometrics across the lifespan," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 16(1), pages 1-16, December.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    JEL classification:

    • C15 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Econometric and Statistical Methods and Methodology: General - - - Statistical Simulation Methods: General
    • C51 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Econometric Modeling - - - Model Construction and Estimation
    • J28 - Labor and Demographic Economics - - Demand and Supply of Labor - - - Safety; Job Satisfaction; Related Public Policy

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:pra:mprapa:129065. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Joachim Winter (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/vfmunde.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.