IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/pra/mprapa/105525.html

Presupuesto: su aplicación en las principales empresas uruguayas exportadoras del sector lácteo
[Budget: its application in the main Uruguayan exporting companies in the dairy sector]

Author

Listed:
  • De-Leon, Marcelo
  • Fernandez, Flavia M
  • López, Fabián

Abstract

This research is about the evolution by the budgetary technique and its new perspectives, where two currents can be found: that one provides the budget with greater adaptability and flexibility or replace it with a new management system. The research is focused in analyze how the budget is prepared and used in the main exporting companies of the Uruguayan dairy sector. Consideration that 95% of the sector's exports are made by six companies, it was decided to make a census. The questionnaire used in the research was prepared in based Fernández (2012, pp. 17-19) and Smolje (2015, pp. 216-226). The principal results shows that companies consider the budget as an important tool used at management, and the interest in go on using it in future. They highlight advantages more than disadvantages. Although they don’t use the same elaboration methodology for budget elaboration, the use of the tool is similar, with focus on the use of the budget for deviations analyze.

Suggested Citation

  • De-Leon, Marcelo & Fernandez, Flavia M & López, Fabián, 2019. "Presupuesto: su aplicación en las principales empresas uruguayas exportadoras del sector lácteo [Budget: its application in the main Uruguayan exporting companies in the dairy sector]," MPRA Paper 105525, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    • Handle: RePEc:pra:mprapa:105525
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/105525/1/MPRA_paper_105525.pdf
    File Function: original version
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ittner, Christopher D. & Larcker, David F., 2001. "Assessing empirical research in managerial accounting: a value-based management perspective," Journal of Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 32(1-3), pages 349-410, December.
    2. Magdalena Bertino & Héctor Tajam, 2000. "La agroindustria láctea en el Uruguay 1911- 1943," Documentos de Trabajo (working papers) 00-04, Instituto de Economía - IECON.
    3. Mariana Radu, 2011. "The Budgetary Process – Reason for Dissatisfaction," Annals of the University of Petrosani, Economics, University of Petrosani, Romania, vol. 11(4), pages 255-262.
    4. Vaillant, Marcel, 1998. "Cluster lácteo en el Uruguay," Sede de la CEPAL en Santiago (Estudios e Investigaciones) 31107, Naciones Unidas Comisión Económica para América Latina y el Caribe (CEPAL).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Abernethy, Margaret A. & Vagnoni, Emidia, 2004. "Power, organization design and managerial behaviour," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 29(3-4), pages 207-225.
    2. Jana Fibírová, 2008. "The Competitive Advantage of Management Accounting [Konkurenční výhoda manažerského účetnictví]," Český finanční a účetní časopis, Prague University of Economics and Business, vol. 2008(2), pages 78-90.
    3. Zbysław Dobrowolski & Grzegorz Drozdowski & Mirela Panait & Arkadiusz Babczuk, 2022. "Can the Economic Value Added Be Used as the Universal Financial Metric?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(5), pages 1-14, March.
    4. Sterling Huang & Gilles Hilary, 2018. "Zombie Board: Board Tenure and Firm Performance," Journal of Accounting Research, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 56(4), pages 1285-1329, September.
    5. Joan Luft & Michael Shields, 2002. "Zimmerman's contentious conjectures: describing the present and prescribing the future of empirical management accounting research," European Accounting Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 11(4), pages 795-803.
    6. Chen, Clara Xiaoling & Lill, Jeremy B. & Lucianetti, Lorenzo, 2023. "Performance measurement system diversity and product innovation: Evidence from longitudinal survey data," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 111(C).
    7. Diana COZMIUC & Ioan PETRISOR, 2015. "The Paradox Of Investment: Constraining Strategy," Proceedings of the INTERNATIONAL MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE, Faculty of Management, Academy of Economic Studies, Bucharest, Romania, vol. 9(1), pages 81-96, November.
    8. Ülle Pärl, 2006. "Choice of measures for performance measurement models on the example of successful Estonian companies," University of Tartu - Faculty of Economics and Business Administration, in: Entrepreneurship in Estonia: policies, practices, education and research, volume 28, chapter 12, pages 228-247, Faculty of Economics and Business Administration, University of Tartu (Estonia).
    9. Leslie A. Robinson & Phillip C. Stocken, 2013. "Location of Decision Rights Within Multinational Firms," Journal of Accounting Research, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 51(5), pages 1261-1297, December.
    10. Ganna Demydyuk, 2011. "Optimal Financial Key Performance Indicators: Evidence From The Airline Industry," Accounting & Taxation, The Institute for Business and Finance Research, vol. 3(2), pages 39-51.
    11. James T. Mackey & F. Johnny Deng, 2016. "Examining the Role of Management Control Systems in the Creation of an Innovative Culture," International Journal of Innovation and Technology Management (IJITM), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 13(03), pages 1-27, June.
    12. Jan Bouwens & Laurence Van Lent, 2007. "Assessing the Performance of Business Unit Managers," Journal of Accounting Research, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 45(4), pages 667-697, September.
    13. Camelia Mihaela Oane (Marinescu) & Klaudia Smol¹g & Emanuel Stefan Marinescu & Romuald Szopa, 2015. "Value-Based Management As The Innovating Paradigm Of Contemporary Governance – A Theoretical Approach," Polish Journal of Management Studies, Czestochowa Technical University, Department of Management, vol. 12(1), pages 106-120, DEcember.
    14. Frank Hartmann & Paolo Perego & Anna Young, 2013. "Carbon Accounting: Challenges for Research in Management Control and Performance Measurement," Abacus, Accounting Foundation, University of Sydney, vol. 49(4), pages 539-563, December.
    15. Bouwens, J.F.M.G. & van Lent, L.A.G.M., 2003. "Effort and Selection Effects of Incentive Contracts," Discussion Paper 2003-130, Tilburg University, Center for Economic Research.
    16. Dimes, Ruth & de Villiers, Charl, 2024. "Hallmarks of Integrated Thinking," The British Accounting Review, Elsevier, vol. 56(1).
    17. David Emsley, 2008. "Different interpretations of a “fixed” concept," Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 21(3), pages 375-397, March.
    18. Ali Ahmad & Dababrata Chowdhury, 2022. "A Review of Effective Communication and ItsImpact on Interpersonal Relationships, Conflict Resolution,and Decision-Making," Review of Applied Socio-Economic Research, Pro Global Science Association, vol. 24(2), pages 18-23, December.
    19. Eva Labro & Mark Lang & Jim Omartian, 2019. "Predictive Analytics and Organizational Architecture: Plant-Level Evidence from Census Data," Working Papers 19-02, Center for Economic Studies, U.S. Census Bureau.
    20. Muurling, Rutger & Lehnert, Thorsten, 2004. "Option-based compensation: a survey," The International Journal of Accounting, Elsevier, vol. 39(4), pages 365-401.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    JEL classification:

    • M1 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Business Administration
    • M10 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Business Administration - - - General
    • M4 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Accounting
    • M49 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Accounting - - - Other

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:pra:mprapa:105525. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Joachim Winter (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/vfmunde.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.