IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/pra/mprapa/10532.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

On Meritocratic Inequality Indices

Author

Listed:
  • Kobus, Martyna
  • Miloś, Piotr

Abstract

We establish a Theorem on Structural Inequality Indices which provides fundamental link between inequality measurement and a concept of social justice embedded in meritocracy framework by taking axiomatic approach and redefining standard properties of inequality indices in a way that incorporates meritocracy, in particular equality of opportunity concept of Roemer (1998). Taking into account recent proof Benabou(2000) that meritocracy contributes positively to growth, which break the conventional trade off between equity and efficiency, the theorem provides for their connection with the theory of inequality measurement. If an index is to be both an inequality index and meritocratic it has to be of a form given in our theorem. We then propose a two-dimensional measure of meritocratic inequality index and discuss its advantages over standard Gini index and in reflecting better the nature of inequality in a society.

Suggested Citation

  • Kobus, Martyna & Miloś, Piotr, 2008. "On Meritocratic Inequality Indices," MPRA Paper 10532, University Library of Munich, Germany.
  • Handle: RePEc:pra:mprapa:10532
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/10532/1/MPRA_paper_10532.pdf
    File Function: original version
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Dutta, Bhaskar, 2002. "Chapter 12 Inequality, poverty and welfare," Handbook of Social Choice and Welfare, in: K. J. Arrow & A. K. Sen & K. Suzumura (ed.), Handbook of Social Choice and Welfare, edition 1, volume 1, chapter 12, pages 597-633, Elsevier.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Checchi, Daniele & De Fraja, Gianni & Verzillo, Stefano, 2014. "And the Winners Are... An Axiomatic Approach to Selection from a Set," IZA Discussion Papers 8344, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
    2. Daniele Checchi & Gianni De Fraja & Stefano Verzillo, 2014. "And the Winners Are… An Axiomatic Approach to Selection from a Set," Discussion Papers 14/05, University of Nottingham, School of Economics.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Makdissi, Paul & Yazbeck, Myra, 2016. "Avoiding blindness to health status in health achievement and health inequality measurement," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 171(C), pages 39-47.
    2. Chun, Youngsub & Mitra, Manipushpak & Mutuswami, Suresh, 2019. "Egalitarianism in the queueing problem," Journal of Mathematical Economics, Elsevier, vol. 81(C), pages 48-56.
    3. Kant, Shashi & Lee, Susan, 2004. "A social choice approach to sustainable forest management: an analysis of multiple forest values in Northwestern Ontario," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 6(3-4), pages 215-227, June.
    4. Bleichrodt, Han & van Doorslaer, Eddy, 2006. "A welfare economics foundation for health inequality measurement," Journal of Health Economics, Elsevier, vol. 25(5), pages 945-957, September.
    5. Maleva, Tatyana Mikhailovna (Малева, Татьяна Михайловна) & Avraamova, Elena (Авраамова, Елена) & Kirillova, M. K. (Кириллова, М. К.) & Burdyak, Alexandra (Бурдяк, Александра) & Tyndik, Alla (Тындик, А, 2014. "Sociological Monitoring Survey of Wages, Income, Poverty and Social Inequality [Социологическое Мониторинговое Обследование Заработных Плат, Доходов, Бедности И Социального Неравенства]," Published Papers om27, Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration.
    6. Croci Angelini, Elisabetta & Michelangeli, Alessandra, 2012. "Axiomatic measurement of multidimensional well-being inequality: Some distributional questions," Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics (formerly The Journal of Socio-Economics), Elsevier, vol. 41(5), pages 548-557.
    7. Plata-Pérez, L. & Sánchez-Pérez, J. & Sánchez-Sánchez, F., 2015. "An elementary characterization of the Gini index," Mathematical Social Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 74(C), pages 79-83.
    8. Kingi Hautahi, 2017. "Welfare Analysis in an Extended Harris-Todaro Model: An Application of the Atkinson Theorem," The B.E. Journal of Theoretical Economics, De Gruyter, vol. 17(1), pages 1-9, January.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    inequality measurement; equality of opportunity; meritocracy; social welfare;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • D63 - Microeconomics - - Welfare Economics - - - Equity, Justice, Inequality, and Other Normative Criteria and Measurement
    • D71 - Microeconomics - - Analysis of Collective Decision-Making - - - Social Choice; Clubs; Committees; Associations

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:pra:mprapa:10532. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Joachim Winter (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/vfmunde.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.